Hoedjes Katja M, Grath Sonja, Posnien Nico, Ritchie Michael G, Schlötterer Christian, Abbott Jessica K, Almudi Isabel, Coronado-Zamora Marta, Durmaz Mitchell Esra, Flatt Thomas, Fricke Claudia, Glaser-Schmitt Amanda, González Josefa, Holman Luke, Kankare Maaria, Lenhart Benedict, Orengo Dorcas J, Snook Rhonda R, Yılmaz Vera M, Yusuf Leeban
Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Division of Evolutionary Biology, LMU Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Mol Ecol. 2024 Jun 10:e17382. doi: 10.1111/mec.17382.
RNA sequencing (RNAseq) methodology has experienced a burst of technological developments in the last decade, which has opened up opportunities for studying the mechanisms of adaptation to environmental factors at both the organismal and cellular level. Selecting the most suitable experimental approach for specific research questions and model systems can, however, be a challenge and researchers in ecology and evolution are commonly faced with the choice of whether to study gene expression variation in whole bodies, specific tissues, and/or single cells. A wide range of sometimes polarised opinions exists over which approach is best. Here, we highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each of these approaches to provide a guide to help researchers make informed decisions and maximise the power of their study. Using illustrative examples of various ecological and evolutionary research questions, we guide the readers through the different RNAseq approaches and help them identify the most suitable design for their own projects.
在过去十年中,RNA测序(RNAseq)方法经历了一系列技术发展,这为在生物体和细胞水平上研究适应环境因素的机制提供了机会。然而,为特定研究问题和模型系统选择最合适的实验方法可能具有挑战性,生态与进化领域的研究人员通常面临着是在整个生物体、特定组织和/或单细胞中研究基因表达变异的选择。对于哪种方法最佳,存在着各种各样有时甚至两极分化的观点。在这里,我们强调每种方法的优缺点,以提供指导,帮助研究人员做出明智的决策并最大限度地提高其研究效能。通过各种生态与进化研究问题的示例,我们引导读者了解不同的RNAseq方法,并帮助他们为自己的项目确定最合适的设计。