Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Health Management Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 10;18(1):248. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02010-9.
The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the perioperative outcomes associated with robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RARP) versus open radical prostatectomy (ORP) in the obese population diagnosed with prostate cancer. We performed a comprehensive search in key databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, encompassing studies of all languages, with a final search date of April 2024. We also omitted articles that consisted of conference abstracts and content that was not pertinent to our study. The aggregated outcomes were evaluated utilizing the metrics of weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs). A sensitivity analysis was also integrated into our assessment. The meta-analysis was facilitated by employing Stata/MP version 18 software. Additionally, the study was duly registered with PROSPERO under the identifier: CRD 42024540216. This meta-analysis, which included five trials, shows that compared to ORP, RARP is associated with a reduced estimated blood loss (EBL) (WMD -445.77, 95%CI -866.08, -25.45; p = 0.038), a decreased transfusion rate (OR 0.17, 95%CI 0.13, 0.21; p < 0.001), and a diminished overall complication rate (OR 0.71, 95%CI 0.58, 0.86; p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in operative time (OT) (WMD 1.88, 95%CI -46.53, 50.28; p = 0.939) or length of stay (LOS) (WMD -0.41, 95%CI -1.07, 0.25; p = 0.221). Among patients with obesity and prostate cancer, RARP demonstrates advantages over ORP by reducing estimated blood loss, transfusion requirements, and the incidence of complications. Notably, there were no significant differences in operative duration and hospital stay between the two surgical approaches. These findings suggest that RARP could be a preferable surgical option for obese individuals with prostate cancer.
本研究旨在对肥胖前列腺癌患者行机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RARP)与开放性根治性前列腺切除术(ORP)的围手术期结局进行对比分析。我们在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 等主要数据库中进行了全面检索,涵盖了所有语言的研究,最终检索日期为 2024 年 4 月。我们还排除了仅包含会议摘要和与我们研究内容不相关的内容的文章。使用加权均数差(WMD)和比值比(OR)评估汇总结局。我们还进行了敏感性分析。使用 Stata/MP 版本 18 软件进行了荟萃分析。此外,该研究已在 PROSPERO 下进行了适当注册,注册号为:CRD 42024540216。这项纳入了五项试验的荟萃分析表明,与 ORP 相比,RARP 与估计出血量减少(EBL)(WMD -445.77,95%CI -866.08,-25.45;p=0.038)、输血率降低(OR 0.17,95%CI 0.13,0.21;p<0.001)和总并发症发生率降低(OR 0.71,95%CI 0.58,0.86;p=0.001)相关。手术时间(OT)(WMD 1.88,95%CI -46.53,50.28;p=0.939)或住院时间(LOS)(WMD -0.41,95%CI -1.07,0.25;p=0.221)无统计学差异。对于肥胖和前列腺癌患者,RARP 通过减少估计出血量、输血需求和并发症发生率显示出优于 ORP 的优势。值得注意的是,两种手术方法在手术时间和住院时间方面没有显著差异。这些发现表明,对于肥胖的前列腺癌患者,RARP 可能是一种更优的手术选择。