Toivonen Leevi A, Laurén Jenna L C, Kautiainen Hannu, Häkkinen Arja H, Neva Marko H
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jan 1;50(1):46-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005065. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
Cohort study.
To evaluate heterogeneity (fluctuation) in minimal important change (MIC) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) through 10 years after lumbar fusion.
PROMs have become key determinants in spine surgery outcomes studies. MIC and PASS were established to aid PROM interpretations. However, their long-term stability has not yet been reported.
A consecutive series of elective lumbar fusions were followed up using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. Improvement was rated by a 4-point Likert scale into "improved" or "nonimproved." Satisfaction-to-treatment was rated by the patients' willingness to undergo surgery again. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis estimated MIC (95% confidence interval, CI) as the PROM change that best predicted improvement at distinct time-points. PASS (CI) was estimated as the lowest PROM score at which the patients were still satisfied. Heterogeneity across thresholds was evaluated using the DeLong algorithm.
MIC for ODI represented heterogeneity across 10 years, ranging from -21 (-24 to -16) at two years to -8 (-7 to -4) at five years, P<0.001. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) (0.79 to 0.85) indicated acceptable to excellent discrimination. Heterogeneity was not significant in the MICs for the pain scores. At one year, MIC for back pain was -24 (-38 to -15), AUC 0.77, and for leg pain, it was -26 (-44 to -8), AUC 0.78. No significant heterogeneity was observed in 10-year PASS scores. At 1-year, PASS for ODI was 22 (15 to 29), AUC 0.85. Similarly, the one-year PASS for back pain was 38 (20 to 56), AUC 0.81, and for leg pain, it was 49 (26 to 72), AUC 0.81.
MIC for ODI fluctuated over 10 years after lumbar fusions. PASS values for all PROMs seemed most stable over time. Caution is needed when generic MIC values are used in long-term studies.
Level III.
队列研究。
评估腰椎融合术后10年患者报告结局(PROMs)中最小重要变化(MIC)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)的异质性(波动情况)。
PROMs已成为脊柱手术结局研究的关键决定因素。MIC和PASS的设立是为了辅助对PROMs的解读。然而,它们的长期稳定性尚未见报道。
对一系列连续的择期腰椎融合手术患者进行随访,使用Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)和视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛情况。改善程度用4级李克特量表评定为“改善”或“未改善”。治疗满意度通过患者是否愿意再次接受手术来评定。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析估计MIC(95%置信区间,CI),即能在不同时间点最佳预测改善情况的PROM变化值。PASS(CI)被估计为患者仍感到满意的最低PROM分数。使用DeLong算法评估不同阈值间的异质性。
ODI的MIC在10年中表现出异质性,从术后2年的-21(-24至-16)到5年的-8(-7至-4),P<0.001。ROC曲线下面积(AUCs)(0.79至0.85)表明区分度可接受至优秀。疼痛评分的MICs中异质性不显著。术后1年,背痛的MIC为-24(-38至-15),AUC为0.77,腿痛的MIC为-26(-44至-8),AUC为0.78。10年的PASS评分未观察到显著异质性。术后1年,ODI的PASS为22(15至29),AUC为0.85。同样,背痛的1年PASS为38(20至56),AUC为0.81,腿痛的为49(26至72),AUC为0.81。
腰椎融合术后10年ODI的MIC存在波动。所有PROMs的PASS值随时间似乎最为稳定。在长期研究中使用通用的MIC值时需谨慎。
三级。