Department of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Psychiatry, University College Dublin, Ireland.
Brain Behav Immun. 2024 Aug;120:327-338. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2024.06.003. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
There is some evidence of an association between inflammation in the pathogenesis of mental disorders. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker of chronic inflammation, which provides a more stable index of systemic inflammation than more widely used biomarkers. This review aims to synthesise studies that measured suPAR concentrations in individuals with a psychiatric disorder, to determine if these concentrations are altered in comparison to healthy participants.
Comprehensive literature searches from inception to October 2023 were conducted of five relevant databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, APA PsychInfo). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to compare the standardised mean difference of blood suPAR levels (i.e. plasma or serum) for individuals with any psychiatric disorder relative to controls. Separate meta-analyses of suPAR levels were conducted for individuals with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder and depressive disorder. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Post-hoc sensitivity analyses included excluding studies at high risk of bias, and analyses of studies that measured suPAR concentrations either in serum or in plasma separately.
The literature search identified 149 records. Ten full-text studies were screened for eligibility and 9 studies were included for review. Primary analyses revealed no significant difference in suPAR levels between individuals with any psychiatric disorder compared to controls (k = 7, SMD = 0.42, 95 % CI [-0.20, 1.04]). However, those with depressive disorder had elevated suPAR levels relative to controls (k = 3, SMD = 0.61, 95 % CI [0.34, 0.87]). Similarly, secondary analyses showed no evidence of a significant difference in suPAR levels in individuals with any psychiatric disorder when studies at high risk of bias were excluded (k = 6, SMD = 0.54, 95 % CI [-0.14, 1.22]), but elevated suPAR concentrations for those with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder were found (k = 3, SMD = 0.98, 95 % CI [0.39, 1.58]). Furthermore, studies that analysed plasma suPAR concentrations found elevated plasma suPAR levels in individuals with any psychiatric disorder relative to controls (k = 5, SMD = 0.84, 95 % CI [0.38, 1.29]), while studies measuring serum suPAR levels in any psychiatric disorder did not find a difference (k = 2, SMD = -0.61, 95 % CI [-1.27, 0.04]). For plasma, elevated suPAR concentrations were also identified for those with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder (k = 3, SMD = 0.98, 95 % CI [0.39, 1.58]).
When studies measuring either only serum or only plasma suPAR were considered, no significant difference in suPAR levels were observed between psychiatric disorder groups, although significantly elevated suPAR levels were detected in those with moderate to severe depressive disorder. However, plasma suPAR levels were significantly elevated in those with any psychiatric disorder relative to controls, while no difference in serum samples was found. A similar finding was reported for schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder. The plasma findings suggest that chronic inflammatory dysregulation may contribute to the pathology of schizophrenia and depressive disorder. Future longitudinal studies are required to fully elucidate the role of this marker in the psychopathology of these disorders.
精神障碍的发病机制中存在炎症的关联证据。可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(suPAR)是慢性炎症的生物标志物,与更广泛使用的标志物相比,它提供了更稳定的全身炎症指数。本综述旨在综合评估测量精神障碍个体中 suPAR 浓度的研究,以确定其浓度是否与健康参与者不同。
从开始到 2023 年 10 月,对五个相关数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus、APA PsychInfo)进行了全面的文献检索。对有任何精神障碍的个体与对照组相比,血液 suPAR 水平(即血浆或血清)的标准化均数差进行了随机效应荟萃分析。对精神分裂症或其他精神病性障碍和抑郁障碍患者的 suPAR 水平分别进行了荟萃分析。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。事后敏感性分析包括排除高偏倚风险的研究,以及分别分析血清或血浆中 suPAR 浓度的研究。
文献检索确定了 149 条记录。对 10 篇全文进行了筛选,以确定其是否符合纳入标准,最终有 9 篇研究纳入了综述。主要分析显示,任何精神障碍患者与对照组相比,suPAR 水平无显著差异(k=7,SMD=0.42,95%CI[-0.20,1.04])。然而,与对照组相比,患有抑郁障碍的患者 suPAR 水平升高(k=3,SMD=0.61,95%CI[0.34,0.87])。同样,二次分析显示,当排除高偏倚风险的研究时,任何精神障碍患者的 suPAR 水平无显著差异(k=6,SMD=0.54,95%CI[-0.14,1.22]),但发现精神分裂症或其他精神病性障碍患者的 suPAR 浓度升高(k=3,SMD=0.98,95%CI[0.39,1.58])。此外,分析血浆 suPAR 浓度的研究发现,与对照组相比,任何精神障碍患者的血浆 suPAR 水平升高(k=5,SMD=0.84,95%CI[0.38,1.29]),而分析血清 suPAR 水平的研究则未发现差异(k=2,SMD=-0.61,95%CI[-1.27,0.04])。对于血浆,也发现精神分裂症或其他精神病性障碍患者的 suPAR 浓度升高(k=3,SMD=0.98,95%CI[0.39,1.58])。
当仅考虑测量血清或血浆 suPAR 的研究时,精神障碍组之间的 suPAR 水平无显著差异,尽管中度至重度抑郁障碍患者的 suPAR 水平明显升高。然而,与对照组相比,任何精神障碍患者的血浆 suPAR 水平均显著升高,而血清样本则无差异。在精神分裂症或其他精神病性障碍患者中也发现了类似的发现。血浆发现表明,慢性炎症失调可能导致精神分裂症和抑郁障碍的发病机制。未来的纵向研究需要充分阐明该标志物在这些疾病的精神病理学中的作用。