• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用国家儿科早期预警评分(PEWS)和简化急性生理学评分(qSOFA)临床评分在全科医疗中评估急性病患儿:一项回顾性队列研究

Assessing children who are acutely ill in general practice using the National PEWS and LqSOFA clinical scores: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Clark Amy, Cannings-John Rebecca, Carrol Enitan D, Thomas-Jones Emma, Sefton Gerri, Hay Alastair D, Butler Christopher C, Hughes Kathryn

机构信息

Paediatrics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge.

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jan 30;75(751):e98-e104. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0638. Print 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2023.0638
PMID:38858101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11497154/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical tools are needed in general practice to help identify children who are seriously ill. The Liverpool quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (LqSOFA) was validated in an emergency department and performed well. The National Paediatric Early Warning System (PEWS) has been introduced in hospitals throughout England with hopes for implementation in general practice.

AIM

To validate the LqSOFA and National PEWS in general practice.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Secondary analysis of 6703 children aged <5 years presenting to 225 general practices in England and Wales with acute illnesses, linked to hospital data.

METHOD

Variables from the LqSOFA and National PEWS were mapped onto study data to calculate score totals. A primary outcome of admission within 2 days of GP consultation was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values (NPVs), positive predictive values (PPVs), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

A total of 104/6703 children were admitted to hospital within 2 days (pre-test probability 1.6%) of GP consultation. The sensitivity of the LqSOFA was 30.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 21.8% to 41.0%), with a specificity of 84.7% (95% CI = 83.7% to 85.6%), PPV of 3.0% (95% CI = 2.1% to 4.4%), NPV of 98.7% (95% CI = 98.4% to 99.0%), and AUC of 0.58 (95% CI = 0.53 to 0.63). The sensitivity of the National PEWS was 81.0% (95% CI = 71.0% to 88.1%), with a specificity of 32.5% (95% CI = 31.2% to 33.8%), PPV of 1.9% (95% CI = 1.5% to 2.5%), NPV of 99.1% (95% CI = 98.4% to 99.4%), and AUC of 0.66 (95% CI = 0.59 to 0.72).

CONCLUSION

Although the NPVs appear useful, owing to low pre-test probabilities rather than discriminative ability, neither tool accurately identified admissions to hospital. Unconsidered use by GPs could result in unsustainable referrals.

摘要

背景

全科医疗需要临床工具来帮助识别重症儿童。利物浦快速序贯器官衰竭评估(LqSOFA)在急诊科得到验证且表现良好。全英国的医院都引入了国家儿科早期预警系统(PEWS),并有望在全科医疗中实施。

目的

在全科医疗中验证LqSOFA和国家PEWS。

设计与背景

对6703名年龄小于5岁、因急性疾病就诊于英格兰和威尔士225家全科诊所的儿童进行二次分析,并与医院数据相联系。

方法

将LqSOFA和国家PEWS中的变量映射到研究数据上以计算总分。以全科医生会诊后2天内入院作为主要结局,计算敏感度、特异度、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)以及受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

共有104/6703名儿童在全科医生会诊后2天内入院(预检概率为1.6%)。LqSOFA的敏感度为30.6%(95%置信区间[CI]=21.8%至41.0%),特异度为84.7%(95%CI=83.7%至85.6%),PPV为3.0%(95%CI=2.1%至4.4%),NPV为98.7%(95%CI=98.4%至99.0%),AUC为0.58(95%CI=0.53至0.63)。国家PEWS的敏感度为81.0%(95%CI=71.0%至88.1%),特异度为32.5%(95%CI=31.2%至33.8%),PPV为1.9%(95%CI=1.5%至2.5%),NPV为99.1%(95%CI=98.4%至99.4%),AUC为0.66(95%CI=0.59至0.72)。

结论

尽管NPV看起来有用,但由于预检概率低而非判别能力,这两种工具都不能准确识别入院情况。全科医生未经考虑的使用可能导致不可持续的转诊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d403/11789809/b741acafa083/bjgpfeb-2025-75-751-e98-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d403/11789809/4089a1264d8d/bjgpfeb-2025-75-751-e98-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d403/11789809/b741acafa083/bjgpfeb-2025-75-751-e98-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d403/11789809/4089a1264d8d/bjgpfeb-2025-75-751-e98-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d403/11789809/b741acafa083/bjgpfeb-2025-75-751-e98-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing children who are acutely ill in general practice using the National PEWS and LqSOFA clinical scores: a retrospective cohort study.使用国家儿科早期预警评分(PEWS)和简化急性生理学评分(qSOFA)临床评分在全科医疗中评估急性病患儿:一项回顾性队列研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jan 30;75(751):e98-e104. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0638. Print 2025 Feb.
2
Accuracy of a Modified qSOFA Score for Predicting Critical Care Admission in Febrile Children.改良 qSOFA 评分对预测发热儿童入住重症监护病房的准确性。
Pediatrics. 2020 Oct;146(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0782.
3
Can paediatric early warning scores (PEWS) be used to guide the need for hospital admission and predict significant illness in children presenting to the emergency department? An assessment of PEWS diagnostic accuracy using sensitivity and specificity.儿科早期预警评分(PEWS)能否用于指导住院需求并预测急诊科就诊儿童的严重疾病?使用敏感性和特异性对PEWS诊断准确性进行评估。
Emerg Med J. 2016 May;33(5):329-37. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204355. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
4
Performance of seven different paediatric early warning scores to predict critical care admission in febrile children presenting to the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.七种不同儿科早期预警评分对急诊科发热儿童转入重症监护病房的预测效能:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 4;11(5):e044091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044091.
5
Validation of pediatric early warning score in pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊室中儿童早期预警评分的验证
Pediatr Int. 2015 Aug;57(4):694-8. doi: 10.1111/ped.12595. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
6
Development of a New Screening Tool for Pediatric Septic Shock.开发一种新的儿科脓毒性休克筛查工具。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Dec;84(6):642-650. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.06.026. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
7
The utility of initial lactate for the quick sequential organ failure assessment (LqSOFA) for emergency septic patients.初始乳酸水平在急诊脓毒症患者快速序贯器官衰竭评估(LqSOFA)中的应用价值。
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 May;91:118-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.02.042. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
8
Paediatric early warning scores are predictors of adverse outcome in the pre-hospital setting: A national cohort study.儿科早期预警评分可预测院前环境下的不良结局:一项全国性队列研究。
Resuscitation. 2018 Dec;133:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
9
Cohort study to test the predictability of the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement Paediatric Early Warning System.队列研究以测试英国国家医疗服务体系创新与改进研究所儿科早期预警系统的可预测性。
Arch Dis Child. 2016 Jun;101(6):552-555. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308465. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
10
Validity of different pediatric early warning scores in the emergency department.不同儿科早期预警评分在急诊科的有效性。
Pediatrics. 2013 Oct;132(4):e841-50. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3594. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Acutely ill children, safety netting, and NHS printers.急症患儿、安全保障及国民保健服务体系打印机。
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jan 30;75(751):51. doi: 10.3399/bjgp25X740517. Print 2025 Feb.
2
Safety netting in primary care: managing the low incidence, high uncertainty of severe illness.基层医疗中的安全网:应对严重疾病的低发病率和高不确定性。
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jan 30;75(751):52-54. doi: 10.3399/bjgp25X740529. Print 2025 Feb.
3
Advances and Challenges in Pediatric Sepsis Diagnosis: Integrating Early Warning Scores and Biomarkers for Improved Prognosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of the NICE traffic light system in children presenting to general practice: a retrospective cohort study.NICE 交通灯系统在普通科诊所就诊儿童中的准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 May 26;72(719):e398-e404. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0633. Print 2022 Jun.
2
Is the NICE traffic light system fit-for-purpose for children presenting with undifferentiated acute illness in primary care?英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)的交通信号灯系统是否适用于基层医疗中出现未分化急性疾病的儿童?
Arch Dis Child. 2022 May;107(5):444-449. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-322768. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
3
Performance of seven different paediatric early warning scores to predict critical care admission in febrile children presenting to the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.
儿童脓毒症诊断的进展与挑战:整合早期预警评分和生物标志物以改善预后
Biomolecules. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):123. doi: 10.3390/biom15010123.
七种不同儿科早期预警评分对急诊科发热儿童转入重症监护病房的预测效能:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 4;11(5):e044091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044091.
4
Accuracy of a Modified qSOFA Score for Predicting Critical Care Admission in Febrile Children.改良 qSOFA 评分对预测发热儿童入住重症监护病房的准确性。
Pediatrics. 2020 Oct;146(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0782.
5
Trends in healthcare use in children aged less than 15 years: a population-based cohort study in England from 2007 to 2017.2007 年至 2017 年英格兰基于人群的队列研究:儿童(年龄小于 15 岁)医疗保健使用趋势。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 5;10(5):e033761. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033761.
6
Long-term outcomes of urinary tract infection (UTI) in Childhood (LUCI): protocol for an electronic record-linked cohort study.儿童尿路感染(UTI)长期结局(LUCI):一项电子病历关联队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e024210. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024210.
7
Why are acute admissions to hospital of children under 5 years of age increasing in the UK?在英国,5岁以下儿童的急性住院人数为何在增加?
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Oct;103(10):917-919. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313958. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
8
Improving the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection in Young Children in Primary Care: Results from the DUTY Prospective Diagnostic Cohort Study.改善初级保健中幼儿尿路感染的诊断和治疗:DUTY前瞻性诊断队列研究结果
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Jul;14(4):325-36. doi: 10.1370/afm.1954.
9
Validating a decision tree for serious infection: diagnostic accuracy in acutely ill children in ambulatory care.验证用于严重感染的决策树:门诊急性病患儿的诊断准确性
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 7;5(8):e008657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008657.
10
Trends in bacterial, mycobacterial, and fungal meningitis in England and Wales 2004-11: an observational study.2004-2011 年英格兰和威尔士细菌、分枝杆菌和真菌性脑膜炎的趋势:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;14(4):301-7. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70332-3. Epub 2014 Feb 7.