Suppr超能文献

新加坡的 SABA 处方和哮喘管理实践:来自 SABINA III 研究的一项横断面观察性研究结果。

SABA prescriptions and asthma management practices in Singapore: results from a cross-sectional, observational SABINA III study.

机构信息

National University Polyclinics, National University Health System, Singapore.

Edinburgh Clinic, Singapore.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 10;14(6):e064245. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064245.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate asthma characteristics and treatment patterns, including short-acting β-agonist (SABA) prescriptions, in primary and specialist care in the Singapore cohort of the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA III) study.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, observational study.

SETTING

Multicentre study conducted at five sites across Singapore.

METHODS

In patients with asthma (aged ≥12 years), data on demographics, disease characteristics and asthma treatment prescriptions were collected using electronic case report forms. Patients were classified by investigator-defined asthma severity (guided by 2017 Global Initiative for Asthma recommendations) and practice type (primary/specialist care).

RESULTS

Of the 205 patients analysed (mean (SD) age, 53.6 (16.8) years; female, 62%), 55.9% were enrolled by specialists and 44.1% by primary care physicians. Most study patients (80.5%) had moderate-to-severe asthma (86.0% in specialist care and 74.4% in primary care). In the 12 months before study enrolment, 18.0% of patients experienced ≥1 severe exacerbation. Asthma was well or partly controlled in 78.0% of patients. Overall, 17.1% of all patients were overprescribed SABA (≥3 SABA canisters/year) in the preceding 12 months, and overprescription was greater in specialist versus primary care (26.3% vs 5.6%). Only 2.9% of patients were prescribed SABA monotherapy, while 41.0% received SABA in addition to maintenance therapy. Among the latter, 40.5% were overprescribed SABA. Overall, a higher percentage of patients prescribed ≥3 SABA canisters (vs 0-2 SABA canisters) were assessed as having uncontrolled asthma during the study visit (42.9% vs 17.6%). Maintenance therapy in the form of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or ICS/long-acting β agonist fixed-dose combinations were prescribed to 14.1% and 84.9% of patients, respectively, in the 12 months before enrolment.

CONCLUSIONS

In this Singapore cohort, ~17% of all patients and more than 40% of patients prescribed SABA in addition to maintenance therapy were overprescribed SABA. These findings emphasise the need to align clinical practices with the latest evidence-based treatment recommendations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03857178.

摘要

目的

评估初级保健和专科护理中 SABA 使用在新加坡队列中的哮喘特征和治疗模式,包括短效 β-激动剂(SABA)处方。

设计

横断面、观察性研究。

设置

在新加坡五个地点进行的多中心研究。

方法

在哮喘患者(年龄≥12 岁)中,使用电子病例报告表收集人口统计学、疾病特征和哮喘治疗处方的数据。根据研究者定义的哮喘严重程度(根据 2017 年全球哮喘倡议建议)和实践类型(初级保健/专科护理)对患者进行分类。

结果

在分析的 205 名患者中(平均(SD)年龄 53.6(16.8)岁;女性占 62%),55.9%由专科医生招募,44.1%由初级保健医生招募。大多数研究患者(80.5%)患有中重度哮喘(专科治疗中为 86.0%,初级保健中为 74.4%)。在研究入组前 12 个月,18.0%的患者经历过≥1 次严重加重。78.0%的患者哮喘得到良好或部分控制。总体而言,在过去 12 个月中,17.1%的所有患者 SABA 处方过量(≥3 个 SABA 药罐/年),专科治疗中 SABA 处方过量的比例高于初级保健(26.3%比 5.6%)。只有 2.9%的患者接受 SABA 单药治疗,而 41.0%的患者在维持治疗的基础上接受 SABA。在后者中,40.5%的患者 SABA 处方过量。总体而言,在研究就诊期间,处方≥3 个 SABA 药罐(与 0-2 个 SABA 药罐相比)的患者中有更高比例被评估为哮喘未得到控制(42.9%比 17.6%)。在入组前 12 个月,分别有 14.1%和 84.9%的患者处方吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)或 ICS/长效β激动剂固定剂量组合作为维持治疗。

结论

在新加坡队列中,约 17%的所有患者和超过 40%的患者在接受维持治疗的基础上同时处方 SABA 的患者中,SABA 处方过量。这些发现强调需要使临床实践与最新的基于证据的治疗建议保持一致。

试验注册

NCT03857178。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54c0/11168155/09269b67e860/bmjopen-2022-064245f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验