• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于哮喘患者短效β受体激动剂处方模式的横断面研究:来自哥伦比亚SABINA III队列的结果。

A Cross-Sectional Study on Prescription Patterns of Short-Acting β-Agonists in Patients with Asthma: Results from the SABINA III Colombia Cohort.

作者信息

Pedrozo-Pupo John Carlos, Pacheco Gallego Manuel Conrado, Baños Álvarez Iván de Jesús, Jaller Raad Rodolfo Antonio, Caballero Pinilla Andrea Carolina, Reynales Londoño Humberto, Bernal Villada Laura, Beekman Maarten

机构信息

PREVICARE LTDA. Programa de Medicina, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia.

División de Neumología y Endoscopia Respiratoria, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Universidad Visión de las Américas, RESPIREMOS Centro de Neumología y Endoscopia Respiratoria, Pereira, Colombia.

出版信息

J Asthma Allergy. 2022 Aug 26;15:1167-1178. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S365009. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/JAA.S365009
PMID:36051434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9427209/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Overuse of short-acting β-agonists (SABAs) for asthma is associated with a significant increase in exacerbations and healthcare resource use. However, limited data exist on the extent of SABA overuse outside of Europe and North America. As part of the multi-country SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study, we characterized SABA prescription patterns in Colombia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This observational, cross-sectional cohort study of SABINA III included patients (aged ≥12 years) with asthma recruited from seven sites in Colombia. Demographics, disease characteristics (including investigator-defined asthma severity guided by the 2017 Global Initiative for Asthma report), and asthma treatments prescribed (including SABAs and inhaled corticosteroids [ICS]) in the 12 months preceding the study were recorded using electronic case report forms during a single study visit.

RESULTS

Of 250 patients analyzed, 50.4%, 33.2%, and 16.4% were enrolled by pulmonologists, general medicine practitioners, and allergists, respectively. Most patients were female (74.0%) and had moderate-to-severe asthma (67.6%). Asthma was partly controlled or uncontrolled in 57.6% of patients, with 15.6% experiencing ≥1 severe exacerbation 12 months before the study visit. In total, 4.0% of patients were prescribed SABA monotherapy and 55.6%, SABA in addition to maintenance therapy. Overall, 39.2% of patients were prescribed ≥3 SABA canisters in the 12 months before the study visit; 25.2% were prescribed ≥10 canisters. Additionally, 17.6% of patients purchased SABAs over the counter, of whom 43.2% purchased ≥3 canisters. Maintenance medication in the form of ICS or ICS/long-acting β-agonist fixed-dose combination was prescribed to 36.0% and 66.8% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that prescription/purchase of ≥3 SABA canisters were common in Colombia, highlighting a public health concern. There is a need to improve asthma care by aligning clinical practices with the latest evidence-based treatment recommendations to improve asthma management across Colombia.

摘要

目的

哮喘患者过度使用短效β受体激动剂(SABA)与病情加重及医疗资源使用显著增加相关。然而,欧洲和北美以外地区SABA过度使用程度的数据有限。作为多国哮喘患者SABA使用情况(SABINA)III研究的一部分,我们对哥伦比亚的SABA处方模式进行了描述。

患者与方法

SABINA III的这项观察性横断面队列研究纳入了从哥伦比亚7个地点招募的年龄≥12岁的哮喘患者。在单次研究访视期间,使用电子病例报告表记录研究前12个月的人口统计学信息、疾病特征(包括依据2017年全球哮喘防治创议报告由研究者定义的哮喘严重程度)以及所开具的哮喘治疗药物(包括SABA和吸入性糖皮质激素[ICS])。

结果

在分析的250例患者中,分别有50.4%、33.2%和16.4%由肺科医生、普通内科医生和过敏症专科医生纳入研究。大多数患者为女性(74.0%),患有中度至重度哮喘(67.6%)。57.6%的患者哮喘处于部分控制或未控制状态,15.6%的患者在研究访视前12个月经历过≥1次严重加重。总计,4.0%的患者被开具SABA单药治疗,55.6%的患者在维持治疗基础上加用SABA。总体而言,39.2%的患者在研究访视前12个月被开具≥3个SABA吸入器;25.2%的患者被开具≥10个吸入器。此外,17.6%的患者非处方购买SABA,其中43.2%购买了≥3个吸入器。分别有36.0%和66.8%的患者被开具ICS或ICS/长效β受体激动剂固定剂量复方制剂形式的维持药物。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在哥伦比亚,处方/购买≥3个SABA吸入器的情况很常见,这凸显了一个公共卫生问题。有必要通过使临床实践与最新的循证治疗建议保持一致来改善哮喘护理,以提升哥伦比亚的哮喘管理水平。

相似文献

1
A Cross-Sectional Study on Prescription Patterns of Short-Acting β-Agonists in Patients with Asthma: Results from the SABINA III Colombia Cohort.一项关于哮喘患者短效β受体激动剂处方模式的横断面研究:来自哥伦比亚SABINA III队列的结果。
J Asthma Allergy. 2022 Aug 26;15:1167-1178. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S365009. eCollection 2022.
2
Over-prescription of short-acting β-agonists remains a serious health concern in Kenya: results from the SABINA III study.在肯尼亚,过度开具短效β激动剂仍然是一个严重的健康问题:SABINA III 研究结果。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jul 8;24(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02030-8.
3
Short-acting β-agonist prescription patterns in patients with asthma in Turkey: results from SABINA III.土耳其哮喘患者中短效 β-激动剂处方模式:SABINA III 研究结果。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Jun 2;22(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02008-9.
4
Over-prescription of short-acting β-agonists for asthma in South Africa: Results from the SABINA III study.南非哮喘患者短效β受体激动剂的过度处方:SABINA III研究结果
Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2022 Dec 19;28(4). doi: 10.7196/AJTCCM.2022.v28i4.220. eCollection 2022.
5
Over-prescription of short-acting β-agonists is associated with poor asthma outcomes: results from the African cohort of the SABINA III study.短效β受体激动剂的过度处方与哮喘不良结局相关:SABINA III研究非洲队列的结果
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Nov;38(11):1983-1995. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2100649. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
6
Overprescription of short-acting β-agonists is associated with poor asthma symptom control: results from five Middle Eastern countries included in the SABINA International (III) study.短效β-激动剂的过度处方与哮喘症状控制不佳有关:SABINA 国际(III)研究中包括的五个中东国家的结果。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2022 Jul;16(7):833-847. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2022.2099841. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
7
Short-acting β-agonist prescription patterns in patients with asthma treated by specialists in Thailand: results from SABINA III.泰国哮喘专家治疗患者中短效 β-激动剂处方模式:SABINA III 研究结果。
J Asthma. 2023 Dec;60(12):2177-2188. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2228895. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
8
Over-prescription of short-acting β-agonists is associated with poor asthma outcomes: results from the Latin American cohort of the SABINA III study.短效β受体激动剂的过度处方与哮喘不良结局相关:SABINA III研究拉丁美洲队列的结果
J Asthma. 2023 Mar;60(3):574-587. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2082305. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
9
Over-prescription of short-acting β-agonists and asthma management in the Gulf region: a multicountry observational study.海湾地区短效β-激动剂的过度处方与哮喘管理:一项多国观察性研究。
Asthma Res Pract. 2022 Jul 7;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40733-022-00085-5.
10
SABA prescriptions and asthma management practices in Singapore: results from a cross-sectional, observational SABINA III study.新加坡的 SABA 处方和哮喘管理实践:来自 SABINA III 研究的一项横断面观察性研究结果。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 10;14(6):e064245. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064245.

引用本文的文献

1
Gaps in asthma diagnosis and treatment in low- and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家哮喘诊断与治疗方面的差距。
Front Allergy. 2023 Oct 23;4:1240259. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1240259. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluation of short-acting Beta-2-agonist prescriptions and associated clinical outcomes: Findings from the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) study in Asia.短效β2受体激动剂处方及相关临床结局评估:亚洲哮喘患者使用短效β2受体激动剂(SABINA)研究的结果
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Oct 16;16(10):100823. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100823. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Over-the-counter use of short-acting beta-2 agonists: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-acting β-agonist prescriptions are associated with poor clinical outcomes of asthma: the multi-country, cross-sectional SABINA III study.短效 β-激动剂处方与哮喘的临床预后不良相关:多国、横断面 SABINA III 研究。
Eur Respir J. 2022 May 5;59(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01402-2021. Print 2022 May.
2
Building Community Capacity in Leadership for Primary Health Care in Colombia.在哥伦比亚建设初级卫生保健领导力方面的社区能力。
MEDICC Rev. 2017 Jul;19(2-3):65. doi: 10.37757/MR2017.V19.N2-3.11. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
3
Position statement: asthma in Latin America. IS short-acting beta-2 agonist helping or compromising asthma management?
短效β-2激动剂的非处方使用:一项系统评价
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Oct 9;16(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00627-z.
立场声明:拉丁美洲的哮喘。短效β2 受体激动剂有助于改善哮喘管理还是带来负面影响?
J Asthma. 2021 Aug;58(8):991-994. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1777563. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
4
Impact of asthma control on different age groups in five Latin American countries.哮喘控制对五个拉丁美洲国家不同年龄组的影响。
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Apr 1;13(4):100113. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100113. eCollection 2020 Apr.
5
Understanding Patient Perspectives on Medication Adherence in Asthma: A Targeted Review of Qualitative Studies.了解患者对哮喘药物依从性的看法:定性研究的针对性综述。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Mar 10;14:541-551. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S234651. eCollection 2020.
6
2020 Brazilian Thoracic Association recommendations for the management of asthma.2020 年巴西胸科协会哮喘管理建议。
J Bras Pneumol. 2020 Mar 2;46(1):e20190307. doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20190307. eCollection 2020.
7
SABINA: global programme to evaluate prescriptions and clinical outcomes related to short-acting β-agonist use in asthma.萨比娜:评估哮喘患者使用短效β受体激动剂的处方及临床疗效的全球项目。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Feb 12;55(2). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01858-2019. Print 2020 Feb.
8
Asthma severity in four countries of Latin America.拉丁美洲四个国家的哮喘严重程度。
BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Jul 9;19(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0871-1.
9
Key factors associated with uncontrolled asthma - the Asthma Control in Latin America Study.与哮喘控制不佳相关的关键因素——拉丁美洲哮喘控制研究
J Asthma. 2020 Feb;57(2):113-122. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1553050. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
10
Large care gaps in primary care management of asthma: a longitudinal practice audit.初级保健中哮喘管理的巨大护理差距:一项纵向实践审计。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):e022506. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022506.