Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Health Psychology and Applied Biological Psychology, Institute of Sustainability Psychology, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.
Trials. 2024 Jun 10;25(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08214-6.
Insomnia is a highly prevalent disorder associated with numerous adverse health outcomes. Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is recommended as first-line treatment by clinical guidelines but is accessible to only a minority of patients suffering from insomnia. Internet-delivered CBT-I (iCBT-I) could contribute to the widespread dissemination of this first-line treatment. As there is insufficient evidence regarding non-inferiority, this study directly aims to compare therapist-guided internet-delivered versus face-to-face CBT-I in terms of insomnia severity post-treatment. Furthermore, a health-economic evaluation will be conducted, and potential benefits and disadvantages of therapist-guided iCBT-I will be examined.
This study protocol describes a randomised controlled two-arm parallel-group non-inferiority trial comparing therapist-guided iCBT-I with face-to-face CBT-I in routine clinical care. A total of 422 patients with insomnia disorder will be randomised and treated at 16 study centres throughout Germany. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 10 weeks after randomisation (post), and 6 months after randomisation (follow-up). The primary outcome is insomnia severity measured using the Insomnia Severity Index. Secondary outcomes include depression-related symptoms, quality of life, fatigue, physical activity, daylight exposure, adverse events related to treatment, and a health-economic evaluation. Finally, potential moderator variables and several descriptive and exploratory outcomes will be assessed (e.g. benefits and disadvantages of internet-delivered treatment).
The widespread implementation of CBT-I is a significant healthcare challenge. The non-inferiority of therapist-guided iCBT-I versus face-to-face CBT-I will be investigated in an adequately powered sample in routine clinical care, with the same therapeutic content and same level of therapist qualifications provided with both interventions. If this trial demonstrates the non-inferiority of therapist-guided iCBT-I, healthcare providers may be more confident recommending this treatment to their patients, contributing to the wider dissemination of CBT-I.
Trial registration number in the German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00028153 ( https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00028153 ). Registered on 16th May 2023.
失眠是一种高发疾病,与许多不良健康后果相关。临床指南推荐认知行为疗法治疗失眠(CBT-I)作为一线治疗方法,但只有少数失眠患者能够接受这种治疗。互联网提供的 CBT-I(iCBT-I)可能有助于这种一线治疗方法的广泛推广。由于缺乏关于非劣效性的证据,本研究直接旨在比较治疗师指导的互联网提供的 CBT-I 与面对面的 CBT-I 在治疗后失眠严重程度方面的差异。此外,还将进行健康经济学评估,并检查治疗师指导的 iCBT-I 的潜在优势和劣势。
本研究方案描述了一项随机对照两臂平行组非劣效性试验,比较了在常规临床护理中治疗师指导的 iCBT-I 与面对面的 CBT-I。共有 422 名失眠障碍患者将在德国 16 个研究中心进行随机分组和治疗。结局将在基线、随机分组后 10 周(后)和随机分组后 6 个月(随访)进行评估。主要结局是使用失眠严重程度指数(ISI)测量的失眠严重程度。次要结局包括抑郁相关症状、生活质量、疲劳、体力活动、日光暴露、与治疗相关的不良事件以及健康经济学评估。最后,将评估潜在的调节变量和几个描述性和探索性结局(例如,互联网治疗的优势和劣势)。
CBT-I 的广泛实施是一个重大的医疗保健挑战。本研究将在常规临床护理中,以足够的样本量,在相同的治疗内容和相同水平的治疗师资格下,对治疗师指导的 iCBT-I 与面对面的 CBT-I 的非劣效性进行调查。如果这项试验证明了治疗师指导的 iCBT-I 的非劣效性,医疗保健提供者可能会更有信心向他们的患者推荐这种治疗方法,从而有助于更广泛地推广 CBT-I。
德国临床试验注册中心的试验注册号:DRKS00028153(https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00028153)。注册于 2023 年 5 月 16 日。