Muthumalage Thivanka, Noel Alexandra, Thanavala Yasmin, Alcheva Aleksandra, Rahman Irfan
School of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States.
School of Veterinary Medicine Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, United States.
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Jun 10;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/188197. eCollection 2024.
Emerging tobacco products such as electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and heated tobacco products (HTPs) have a dynamic landscape and are becoming widely popular as they claim to offer a low-risk alternative to conventional smoking. Most pre-clinical laboratories currently exploit , , and experimental models to assess toxicological outcomes as well as to develop risk-estimation models. While most laboratories have produced a wide range of cell culture and mouse model data utilizing current smoke/aerosol generators and standardized puffing profiles, much variation still exists between research studies, hindering the generation of usable data appropriate for the standardization of these tobacco products. In this review, we discuss current state-of-the-art and models and their challenges, as well as insights into risk estimation of novel products and recommendations for toxicological parameters for reporting, allowing comparability of the research studies between laboratories, resulting in usable data for regulation of these products before approval by regulatory authorities.
新兴烟草产品,如电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)和加热烟草产品(HTPs),其形势不断变化,且正变得广受欢迎,因为它们声称能提供一种比传统吸烟风险更低的选择。目前,大多数临床前实验室利用细胞培养、动物模型和暴露系统实验模型来评估毒理学结果以及开发风险评估模型。虽然大多数实验室利用当前的烟雾/气溶胶发生器和标准化抽吸模式已经产生了大量的细胞培养和小鼠模型数据,但研究之间仍存在很大差异,这阻碍了生成适用于这些烟草产品标准化的可用数据。在本综述中,我们讨论了当前最先进的细胞培养、动物模型和暴露系统模型及其面临的挑战,以及对新产品风险评估的见解和报告毒理学参数的建议,以便各实验室之间的研究具有可比性,从而在监管机构批准之前生成用于这些产品监管的可用数据。