From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (P.H.K., H.M.Y., C.W.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea (J.Y.H., Y.H.C.); and Department of Radiology, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, College of Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Republic of Korea (J.Y.H.).
Radiology. 2024 Jun;311(3):e232462. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232462.
Background Despite a proven role in the characterization of liver lesions, use of the gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) gadoxetate disodium at MRI is limited in children due to a lack of comparative safety data. Purpose To evaluate the safety of the GBCA gadoxetate disodium (a linear ionic hepatobiliary contrast agent [HBA]) in children and adolescents, compared with extracellular contrast agents (ECA). Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted in children and adolescents aged 18 years or younger who underwent HBA-enhanced MRI at one of three tertiary hospitals from January 2010 to December 2022. The incidence of GBCA-associated acute adverse events was compared between MRI examinations with a HBA and those with ECA. Severity was categorized according to American College of Radiology guidelines (mild, moderate, or severe). Propensity score matching using multivariable logistic regression models and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis based on nine covariates (age, sex, asthma, allergic rhinitis, chronic urticaria or atopy, food allergy, drug allergy, premedication, and history of GBCA-associated adverse events) were used for confounder adjustment. Results A total of 1629 MRI examinations (ECA, = 1256; HBA, = 373) in 1079 patients were included (mean age, 8.6 years ± 6.5; 566 girls). The per-examination incidence of GBCA-associated acute adverse events showed no evidence of a difference, with rates of 0.9% (11 of 1256 examinations) for ECA and 1.3% (five of 373 examinations) for HBA (odds ratio [OR], 1.55 [95% CI: 0.54, 4.46]; = .42). Acute adverse events were all mild with ECA, whereas with HBA, they were mild for four patients and moderate for one patient. There was no evidence of a difference in the incidence of acute adverse events, even in propensity score matching (OR, 1.33 [95% CI: 0.30, 5.96]; = .71) and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis (OR, 0.84 [95% CI: 0.25, 2.86]; = .78). Conclusion Gadoxetate disodium showed no difference in acute adverse events compared with ECA in children and adolescents, with further large-scale pediatric studies required to confirm its safety. © RSNA, 2024 . See also the editorial by Otero in this issue.
背景 尽管钆基对比剂(GBCA)钆塞酸二钠在肝脏病变的特征描述中具有可靠作用,但由于缺乏比较安全性数据,其在儿童中的应用受到限制。目的 评估线性离子肝胆对比剂(HBA)钆塞酸二钠(GBCA)在儿童和青少年中的安全性,与细胞外对比剂(ECA)进行比较。材料与方法 对 2010 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在三家三级医院进行 HBA 增强 MRI 的年龄在 18 岁或以下的儿童和青少年进行了回顾性分析。比较 HBA 与 ECA 检查的 GBCA 相关急性不良事件的发生率。根据美国放射学院指南(轻度、中度或重度)对严重程度进行分类。采用多变量逻辑回归模型进行倾向评分匹配,并基于 9 个协变量(年龄、性别、哮喘、过敏性鼻炎、慢性荨麻疹或特应性、食物过敏、药物过敏、预处理和 GBCA 相关不良事件史)进行逆概率治疗加权分析,以调整混杂因素。结果 共纳入 1079 例患者的 1629 次 MRI 检查(ECA, = 1256;HBA, = 373)(平均年龄 8.6 岁 ± 6.5 岁;566 名女性)。ECA 和 HBA 检查的 GBCA 相关急性不良事件发生率均无差异,分别为 0.9%(11/1256 次检查)和 1.3%(5/373 次检查)(比值比 [OR],1.55 [95%CI:0.54,4.46]; =.42)。急性不良事件在 ECA 中均为轻度,而在 HBA 中,4 例为轻度,1 例为中度。即使在倾向评分匹配(OR,1.33 [95%CI:0.30,5.96]; =.71)和逆概率治疗加权分析(OR,0.84 [95%CI:0.25,2.86]; =.78)中,也未发现急性不良事件发生率存在差异。结论 与 ECA 相比,儿童和青少年使用钆塞酸二钠无差异急性不良事件,需要进一步进行大规模儿科研究以确认其安全性。© 2024RSNA。 请参阅本期杂志中 Otero 的社论。