Ranadive Sushant M, Weiner Cynthia M, Eagan Lauren E, Addison Odessa, Landers-Ramos Rian Q, Prior Steven J
Department of Kinesiology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Exp Physiol. 2024 Aug;109(8):1385-1394. doi: 10.1113/EP091680. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
This study was performed to determine whether prolonged endurance running results in acute endothelial dysfunction and wave-reflection, as endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness are cardiovascular risk factors. Vascular function (conduit artery/macrovascular and resistance artery/microvascular) was assessed in 11 experienced runners (8 males, 3 females) before, during and after a 50 km ultramarathon. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), wave reflection, augmentation index (AIx) and AIx corrected for HR (AIx75) were taken at all time points-Baseline (BL), following 10, 20, 30 and 40 km, 1 h post-completion (1HP) and 24 h post-completion (24HP). Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and inflammatory biomarkers were examined at BL, 1HP and 24HP. Reactive hyperaemia area under the curve (AUC) and shear rate AUC to peak dilatation were lower (∼75%) at 1HP compared with BL (P < 0.001 for both) and reactive hyperaemia was higher at 24HP (∼27%) compared with BL (P = 0.018). Compared to BL, both mean central systolic BP and mean central diastolic BP were 7% and 10% higher, respectively, following 10 km and 6% and 9% higher, respectively, following 20 km, and then decreased by 5% and 8%, respectively, at 24HP (P < 0.05 for all). AIx (%) decreased following 20 km and following 40 km compared with BL (P < 0.05 for both) but increased following 40 km when corrected for HR (AIx75) compared with BL (P = 0.02). Forward wave amplitude significantly increased at 10 km (15%) compared with BL (P = 0.049), whereas backward wave reflection and reflected magnitude were similar at all time points. FMD and baseline diameter remained similar. These data indicate preservation of macrovascular (endothelial) function, but not microvascular function resulting from the 50 km ultramarathon.
本研究旨在确定长时间耐力跑是否会导致急性内皮功能障碍和波反射,因为内皮功能障碍和动脉僵硬度是心血管危险因素。在11名经验丰富的跑步者(8名男性,3名女性)参加50公里超级马拉松比赛之前、期间和之后,评估其血管功能(输送动脉/大血管和阻力动脉/微血管)。在所有时间点——基线(BL)、跑完10、20、30和40公里后、完成后1小时(1HP)和完成后24小时(24HP)——测量血压(BP)、心率(HR)、波反射、增强指数(AIx)以及校正心率后的AIx(AIx75)。在BL、1HP和24HP时检测血流介导的舒张功能(FMD)和炎症生物标志物。与BL相比,1HP时反应性充血曲线下面积(AUC)和达到最大舒张时的剪切速率AUC降低(约75%)(两者P<0.001),24HP时反应性充血比BL时升高(约27%)(P=0.018)。与BL相比,跑完10公里后平均中心收缩压和平均中心舒张压分别升高7%和10%,跑完20公里后分别升高6%和9%,然后在24HP时分别下降5%和8%(所有P<0.05)。与BL相比,跑完20公里和40公里后AIx(%)降低(两者P<0.05),但校正心率后(AIx75),跑完40公里后与BL相比升高(P=0.02)。与BL相比,10公里时正向波振幅显著增加(15%)(P=0.049),而在所有时间点反向波反射和反射幅度相似。FMD和基线直径保持相似。这些数据表明50公里超级马拉松导致大血管(内皮)功能得以保留,但微血管功能未保留。