Departments of Burn and Plastic Surgery and Wound Repair, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining, China.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2415310. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15310.
Peceleganan spray is a novel topical antimicrobial agent targeted for the treatment of skin wound infections. However, its efficacy and safety remain unclear.
To assess the safety and efficacy of peceleganan spray for the treatment of wound infections.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial recruited and followed up 570 adult patients diagnosed with secondary open wound infections from 37 hospitals in China from August 23, 2021, to July 16, 2022.
Patients were randomized to 2 groups with a 2:1 allocation. One group received treatment with 2% peceleganan spray (n = 381) and the other with 1% silver sulfadiazine (SSD) cream (n = 189).
The primary efficacy outcome was the clinical efficacy rate (the number of patients fulfilling the criteria for efficacy of the number of patients receiving the treatment) on the first day following the end of treatment (day 8). The secondary outcomes included the clinical efficacy rate on day 5 and the bacterial clearance rate (cases achieving negative bacteria cultures after treatment of all cases with positive bacteria cultures before treatment) on days 5 and 8. The safety outcomes included patients' vital signs, physical examination results, electrocardiographic findings, blood test results, and adverse reactions.
Among the 570 patients randomized to 1 of the 2 groups, 375 (98.4%) in the 2% peceleganan treatment group and 183 (96.8%) in the 1% SSD control group completed the trial (n = 558). Of these, 361 (64.7%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 48.6 (15.3) years. The demographic characteristics were similar between groups. On day 8, clinical efficacy was achieved by 339 patients (90.4%) in the treatment group and 144 (78.7%) in the control group (P < .001). On day 5, clinical efficacy was achieved by 222 patients (59.2%) in the treatment group and 90 (49.2%) in the control group (P = .03). On day 8, bacterial clearance was achieved by 80 of 334 patients (24.0%) in the treatment group and in 75 of 163 (46.0%) in the control group (P < .001). On day 5, bacterial clearance was achieved by 55 of 334 patients (16.5%) in the treatment group and 50 of 163 (30.7%) in the control group (P < .001). The adverse events related to the application of peceleganan spray and SSD cream were similar.
This randomized clinical trial found that peceleganan spray is a safe topical antimicrobial agent with a satisfactory clinical efficacy rate for the treatment of skin wound infections, while the effectiveness of bacterial clearance remains uncertain.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2100047202.
Peceleganan 喷雾是一种新型局部抗菌剂,针对皮肤伤口感染的治疗。然而,其疗效和安全性仍不清楚。
评估 Peceleganan 喷雾治疗伤口感染的安全性和疗效。
设计、地点和参与者:这项多中心、开放标签、3 期随机临床试验招募并随访了来自中国 37 家医院的 570 名诊断为继发性开放性伤口感染的成年患者,时间为 2021 年 8 月 23 日至 2022 年 7 月 16 日。
患者随机分为两组,2:1 分配。一组接受 2% Peceleganan 喷雾治疗(n=381),另一组接受 1%磺胺嘧啶银乳膏(SSD)治疗(n=189)。
主要疗效终点为治疗结束后第 1 天(第 8 天)的临床疗效率(符合疗效标准的患者数/接受治疗的患者数)。次要结局包括第 5 天和第 8 天的临床疗效率和细菌清除率(所有阳性细菌培养病例经治疗后转为阴性细菌培养的病例数/所有阳性细菌培养病例数)。安全性结局包括患者的生命体征、体格检查结果、心电图发现、血液检查结果和不良反应。
在随机分为两组的 570 名患者中,2% Peceleganan 治疗组有 375 名(98.4%)和 1% SSD 对照组有 183 名(96.8%)完成了试验(n=558)。其中,361 名(64.7%)为男性,平均(SD)年龄为 48.6(15.3)岁。两组的人口统计学特征相似。第 8 天,治疗组有 339 名(90.4%)患者达到临床疗效,对照组有 144 名(78.7%)患者达到(P<.001)。第 5 天,治疗组有 222 名(59.2%)患者达到临床疗效,对照组有 90 名(49.2%)患者达到(P=.03)。第 8 天,治疗组有 80 名(24.0%)患者细菌清除,对照组有 75 名(46.0%)患者细菌清除(P<.001)。第 5 天,治疗组有 55 名(16.5%)患者细菌清除,对照组有 50 名(30.7%)患者细菌清除(P<.001)。与 Peceleganan 喷雾和 SSD 乳膏应用相关的不良反应相似。
这项随机临床试验发现,Peceleganan 喷雾是一种安全的局部抗菌剂,对皮肤伤口感染的临床疗效率令人满意,而细菌清除的有效性仍不确定。
中国临床试验注册中心标识符:ChiCTR2100047202。