Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7420, USA.
Biometrics. 2024 Mar 27;80(2). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae056.
In many randomized placebo-controlled trials with a biomarker defined subgroup, it is believed that this subgroup has the same or higher treatment effect compared with its complement. These subgroups are often referred to as the biomarker positive and negative subgroups. Most biomarker-stratified pivotal trials are aimed at demonstrating a significant treatment effect either in the biomarker positive subgroup or in the overall population. A major shortcoming of this approach is that the treatment can be declared effective in the overall population even though it has no effect in the biomarker negative subgroup. We use the isotonic assumption about the treatment effects in the two subgroups to construct an efficient way to test for a treatment effect in both the biomarker positive and negative subgroups. A substantial reduction in the required sample size for such a trial compared with existing methods makes evaluating the treatment effect in both the biomarker positive and negative subgroups feasible in pivotal trials especially when the prevalence of the biomarker positive subgroup is less than 0.5.
在许多具有生物标志物定义亚组的随机安慰剂对照试验中,人们认为该亚组的治疗效果与其他亚组相同或更高。这些亚组通常被称为生物标志物阳性和阴性亚组。大多数基于生物标志物的关键性试验旨在证明生物标志物阳性亚组或总体人群中存在显著的治疗效果。这种方法的一个主要缺点是,即使在生物标志物阴性亚组中没有效果,也可以宣布该治疗在总体人群中有效。我们使用关于两个亚组中治疗效果的等渗假设来构建一种有效的方法,以测试生物标志物阳性和阴性亚组中的治疗效果。与现有方法相比,这种试验所需的样本量大大减少,使得在关键性试验中评估生物标志物阳性和阴性亚组中的治疗效果变得可行,尤其是当生物标志物阳性亚组的患病率低于 0.5 时。