Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 大流行前后的气管切开术。

Tracheostomy before and during COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Therapy, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Radiol Oncol. 2024 Jun 12;58(4):556-564. doi: 10.2478/raon-2024-0034. eCollection 2024 Dec 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to provide insight into the influence of the COVID-19 on the frequency and characteristics of urgent and emergent tracheostomies (TS), comparing data collected both before and during the pandemic. Our two hypotheses were that and that .

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The research was retrospective. The study period included the two years before and after the COVID-19 outbreak in Slovenia. Forty-one patients in each period met the inclusion criteria. Their medical charts were reviewed. The anamnestic, clinical, surgical and anaesthesiological data were collected. The two groups of patients from corresponding time periods were statistically compared.

RESULTS

Predominantly men required the surgical resolution of acute upper airway obstruction (76% of patients). The causes for acute respiratory distress included head and neck cancer (62%), infections (20%), vocal cord paralysis (16%), and stenosis (2%). There were no statistically significant differences either in the (emergent/urgent) setting of TS or in the type of anaesthesia used. Both hypotheses were rejected. A statistically significant rise in use of the C-MAC laryngoscope during COVID-19 (from 3% to 15%) was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The outbreak of COVID-19 did not have a statistically significant effect on the frequency of performing emergent and urgent tracheostomies nor on the use of general or local anaesthesia. It did, however, require a change of intubation technique. Consequently, a significant rise in the use of the C-MAC laryngoscope was noted.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在深入了解 COVID-19 对紧急和急症气管切开术(TS)频率和特征的影响,并比较大流行前后收集的数据。我们有两个假设,即 和 。

患者和方法

本研究为回顾性研究。研究期间包括 COVID-19 在斯洛文尼亚爆发前后的两年。每个时期有 41 名符合纳入标准的患者。回顾他们的病历。收集了病史、临床、手术和麻醉学数据。对来自相应时间段的两组患者进行了统计学比较。

结果

主要是男性需要手术解决急性上呼吸道梗阻(76%的患者)。急性呼吸窘迫的原因包括头颈部癌症(62%)、感染(20%)、声带麻痹(16%)和狭窄(2%)。TS 的紧急/紧急设置或使用的麻醉类型均无统计学差异。两个假设均被拒绝。报告 COVID-19 期间 C-MAC 喉镜的使用显著增加(从 3%增加到 15%)。

结论

COVID-19 的爆发对紧急和急症气管切开术的频率以及全身或局部麻醉的使用均无统计学显著影响。然而,它确实需要改变插管技术。因此,注意到 C-MAC 喉镜的使用显著增加。

相似文献

1
Tracheostomy before and during COVID-19 pandemic.
Radiol Oncol. 2024 Jun 12;58(4):556-564. doi: 10.2478/raon-2024-0034. eCollection 2024 Dec 1.
2
Discordant SARS-CoV-2 Detection in the Nasopharynx Versus Trachea for Patients With Tracheostomies.
Laryngoscope. 2021 Oct;131(10):E2634-E2638. doi: 10.1002/lary.29617. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
Emergent tracheostomy during the pandemic of COVID-19: Slovenian National Recommendations.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jul;278(7):2209-2217. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06318-8. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
4
Emergent Awake tracheostomy--The five-year experience at an urban tertiary care center.
Laryngoscope. 2015 Nov;125(11):2476-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.25348. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
5
Tracheostomy in the COVID-19 pandemic.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jul;277(7):2133-2135. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05982-0. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
6
Tracheostomy during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Recommendations from the New York Head and Neck Society.
Head Neck. 2020 Jun;42(6):1282-1290. doi: 10.1002/hed.26166. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
7
Awake vs Sedated Tracheostomies: A Review and Comparison at a Single Institution.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Nov;159(5):830-834. doi: 10.1177/0194599818789079. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
8
A Prospective Study of Voice, Swallow, and Airway Outcomes Following Tracheostomy for COVID-19.
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jun;131(6):E1918-E1925. doi: 10.1002/lary.29346. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway.
Anesthesiology. 2022 Jan 1;136(1):31-81. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002.
2
Elective open "Shield Tracheostomy" in patients with COVID-19.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Feb;279(2):891-897. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06820-7. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
3
Emergent tracheostomy during the pandemic of COVID-19: Slovenian National Recommendations.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jul;278(7):2209-2217. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06318-8. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
4
Videolaryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in patients with COVID-19.
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Sep;125(3):e284-e286. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
6
Patient and surgery factors associated with the incidence of failed and difficult intubation.
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jun;75(6):756-766. doi: 10.1111/anae.14997. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
8
Learning fiberoptic intubation for awake nasotracheal intubation.
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Dec;17(4):297-305. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.4.297. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
10
The emergent surgical airway: cricothyrotomy vs. tracheotomy.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Feb;42(2):204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.10.021. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验