Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany; Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padova, Italy.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Oct;246:105979. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105979. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
The current study examined predictions from embodied cognition for effects of finger counting on number processing. Although finger counting is spontaneous and nearly universal, counting habits reflect learning and culture. European cultures use a sub-base-five system, requiring a full hand plus additional fingers to express numbers exceeding 5. Chinese culture requires only one hand to express such numbers. We investigated the differential impact of early-acquired finger-based number representations on adult symbolic number processing. In total, 53 European and 56 Chinese adults performed two versions of the magnitude classification task, where numbers were presented either as Arabic symbols or as finger configurations consistent with respective cultural finger-counting habits. Participants classified numbers as smaller/larger than 5 with horizontally aligned buttons. Finger-based size and distance effects were larger in Chinese compared with Europeans. These differences did not, however, induce reliably different symbol processing signatures. This dissociation challenges the idea that sensory and motor habits shape our conceptual representations and implies notation-specific processing patterns.
当前的研究检验了具身认知对手指计数对数字处理影响的预测。虽然手指计数是自发的,几乎是普遍的,但计数习惯反映了学习和文化。欧洲文化使用一个基于五的子系统,需要一只手加上额外的手指来表示超过 5 的数字。而中国文化只需要一只手就能表示这样的数字。我们研究了早期获得的基于手指的数字表示对成人符号数字处理的不同影响。共有 53 名欧洲人和 56 名中国人完成了两个版本的大小分类任务,其中数字以阿拉伯符号或与各自文化的手指计数习惯一致的手指配置呈现。参与者用水平对齐的按钮将数字分类为小于/大于 5。与欧洲人相比,中国人的基于手指的大小和距离效应更大。然而,这些差异并没有可靠地诱导出不同的符号处理特征。这种分离挑战了感觉和运动习惯塑造我们的概念表示的观点,并暗示了特定于符号的处理模式。