Western Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2715, Australia.
Western Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2715, Australia.
Women Birth. 2024 Jul;37(4):101631. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101631. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
Obstetric violence, including unconsented interventions, coercion and disrespect, violates human rights; impacting the physical and psychosocial health of women. The perspective and experience of midwives related to obstetric violence have been explored in low and middle-income countries, with limited research into the experience of midwives in high income nations.
To explore Australian midwives' perspectives of obstetric violence.
Thematic analysis of qualitative in-depth interviews with 15 midwives experienced in supporting women during birth. Critical feminist theory underpinned each stage of the research.
Interviews with 15 Australian midwives from diverse care settings were analysed thematically. Four key themes were developed from the data: 'the operationalisation of obstetric violence', 'the impact of obstetric violence' 'the historical and situational context' and 'hope for the future'. Midwives considered entrenched patriarchal structures and gender inequity as fundamental to the occurrence of obstetric violence. This societal scaffold is intensified within health care systems where power imbalances facilitate maternal mistreatment through coercion and grooming women for compliance in the antenatal period. Fragmented care models expose women to mistreatment with continuity models being protective only to a point. Midwives experience their own trauma, as a result of what they have witnessed, and due to the lack of support they receive when advocating for women.
Obstetric violence occurs in Australian maternity systems with unconsented interventions, overmedicalisation, coercion, and disrespect observed by midwives. Care-related trauma impacts on the mental health of midwives, raising workforce concerns for policy makers, consumer advocates and professional bodies.
产科暴力,包括未经同意的干预、强制和不尊重,侵犯了人权;影响妇女的身心健康。在中低收入国家已经探讨了助产士对产科暴力的看法和经验,而对高收入国家助产士的经验研究则有限。
探讨澳大利亚助产士对产科暴力的看法。
对 15 名有丰富支持妇女分娩经验的助产士进行深入的定性访谈的主题分析。批判性女性主义理论为研究的各个阶段提供了基础。
对来自不同护理环境的 15 名澳大利亚助产士的访谈进行了主题分析。从数据中得出了四个关键主题:“产科暴力的实施”、“产科暴力的影响”、“历史和情境背景”和“对未来的希望”。助产士认为,根深蒂固的父权制结构和性别不平等是产科暴力发生的根本原因。这种社会结构在医疗保健系统中加剧,权力失衡通过强制和在产前阶段培养妇女的顺从性来促成对产妇的虐待。碎片化的护理模式使妇女面临虐待的风险,连续性护理模式只能在一定程度上起到保护作用。助产士由于目睹的事情和在为妇女辩护时缺乏支持而经历自己的创伤。
澳大利亚产科学系统中存在产科暴力,包括未经同意的干预、过度医疗化、强制和不尊重,助产士观察到这些现象。与护理相关的创伤对助产士的心理健康产生影响,这引起了政策制定者、消费者倡导者和专业机构对劳动力的关注。