Bar-Zeev Yael, Berg Carla J, Khayat Amal, Abroms Lorien C, Wang Yan, Duan Zongshuan, LoParco Cassidy R, Cui Yuxian, Elbaz Daniel, Levine Hagai
Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Hadassah Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel
Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 11. doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058509.
It is unclear how tobacco companies respond to increasing restrictions on points-of-sale (POS) (eg, advertisement ban, display ban), especially regarding newer products, such as IQOS, a heated tobacco product. This study compared POS marketing strategies for IQOS (and HEETS tobacco sticks) before and after Israel implemented a display ban and plain packaging.
Audits of stores selling IQOS (n=87) in four Israeli cities were conducted, 16-20 months post display ban and plain packaging introduction, including previously audited stores (n=60) (prior to the implementation of these measures). Descriptive analyses and matched pre-post comparisons were conducted to assess regulatory compliance and marketing strategies over time.
Almost all stores (90.8%) were non-compliant with the display ban; but most were compliant with plain packaging (81.6%) and advertisement ban (83.5%) regulations. Following the display ban, there was a significant increase in the number of IQOS/HEETS internal advertisements (21.7% vs 41.7%, p=0.023). These were mostly compliant with the advertisement ban (ie, did not mention the brand name explicitly), and appeared in the form of generic signs or flags and/or special displays. The percentage of stores featuring the IQOS device increased (1.7% to 20.0%, p=0.003), as did the percentage carrying at least four HEETS flavours (36.7% to 63.3%, p=0.006).
This sample of Israeli stores selling IQOS showed low compliance with the display ban. The increase in signs/special displays, mostly compliant with the advertisement ban, could serve as purchase cues circumventing the intent of the legislation. Regulatory efforts should consider more specific legislative language and comprehensive enforcement plans.
尚不清楚烟草公司如何应对日益严格的销售点(POS)限制措施(例如广告禁令、展示禁令),尤其是对于新型产品,如加热烟草产品IQOS。本研究比较了以色列实施展示禁令和素面包装前后IQOS(以及HEETS烟弹)的销售点营销策略。
在以色列四个城市对销售IQOS的商店(n = 87)进行审计,时间为展示禁令和素面包装实施后的16 - 20个月,其中包括之前审计过的商店(n = 60)(在这些措施实施之前)。进行描述性分析和前后匹配比较,以评估随时间推移的监管合规情况和营销策略。
几乎所有商店(90.8%)都未遵守展示禁令;但大多数商店遵守了素面包装规定(81.6%)和广告禁令规定(83.5%)。展示禁令实施后,IQOS/HEETS内部广告数量显著增加(21.7%对41.7%,p = 0.023)。这些广告大多符合广告禁令(即未明确提及品牌名称),并以通用标志或旗帜和/或特殊展示的形式出现。展示IQOS设备的商店百分比增加(1.7%至20.0%,p = 0.003),携带至少四种HEETS口味的商店百分比也增加了(36.7%至63.3%,p = 0.006)。
这家以色列IQOS销售商店样本显示对展示禁令的遵守程度较低。标志/特殊展示的增加,大多符合广告禁令,可能成为规避立法意图的购买提示。监管措施应考虑更具体的立法措辞和全面的执法计划。