Intermountain Medical Center Department of Pharmacy, 5121 Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA.
Intermountain Medical Center Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, 5121 Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA.
Neurol Sci. 2024 Nov;45(11):5449-5456. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07635-0. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
There is not a preferred medication for treating refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and intravenous ketamine is increasingly used. Ketamine efficacy, safety, dosage, and influence of other variables on seizure cessation while on ketamine infusions are not well studied. We aimed to characterize ketamine effect on RSE, including interictal activity on electroencephalogram (EEG) and when done by Teleneurocritical care (TNCC).
We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study from August 2017 to October 2022. Patients 18 years or older who had RSE and received ketamine were included. The primary outcome was effect of ketamine on RSE including interictal activity; secondary outcomes were effect of other variables on RSE, care by TNCC, ketamine infusion dynamics, adverse events, and discharge outcomes. Logistic regression was used.
Fifty-one patients from five hospitals met inclusion criteria; 30 patients had RSE and interictal activity on EEG. Median age was 56.8 years (IQR 18.2) and 26% had previously diagnosed epilepsy. Sixteen (31%) patients were treated virtually by TNCC. In those with RSE on EEG, ketamine was added as the fourth antiseizure medication (mean 4.4, SD 1.6). An initial bolus of ketamine was used in 24% of patients (95 mg, IQR 47.5), the median infusion rate was 30.8 mcg/kg/min (IQR 40.4), and median infusion duration was 40 h (IQR 37). Ketamine was associated with 50% cessation of RSE and interictal activity at 24 h in 84% of patients, and complete seizure cessation in 43% of patients. In linear regression, ASMs prior to ketamine were associated with seizure cessation (OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9-6.9, p = 0.05), while the inverse was seen with propofol infusions (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.001-0.43, p = 0.01). RSE management by in-person NCC versus virtual by TNCC did not affect rates of seizure cessation.
Ketamine infusions for RSE were associated with reduced seizure burden at 24 h, with 84% of patients having 50% seizure reduction. Similar efficacy and safety was observed irrespective of underlying RSE etiology or when done via TNCC vs in-person NCC.
目前尚无治疗难治性癫痫持续状态(RSE)的首选药物,而静脉注射氯胺酮的应用越来越广泛。氯胺酮的疗效、安全性、剂量以及其他变量对输注氯胺酮时癫痫发作停止的影响尚未得到很好的研究。我们旨在描述氯胺酮对 RSE 的影响,包括脑电图(EEG)上的发作间期活动以及远程神经重症监护(TNCC)下的作用。
我们进行了一项多中心、回顾性研究,时间为 2017 年 8 月至 2022 年 10 月。纳入年龄在 18 岁或以上、患有 RSE 并接受氯胺酮治疗的患者。主要结局是氯胺酮对 RSE 的影响,包括发作间期活动;次要结局是其他变量对 RSE 的影响、TNCC 护理、氯胺酮输注动力学、不良事件和出院结局。采用逻辑回归。
来自五家医院的 51 名患者符合纳入标准;其中 30 名患者的 EEG 上有 RSE 和发作间期活动。中位年龄为 56.8 岁(IQR 18.2),26%的患者此前诊断为癫痫。16 名(31%)患者接受了 TNCC 的虚拟治疗。在 EEG 上有 RSE 的患者中,氯胺酮作为第四种抗癫痫药物(平均 4.4,SD 1.6)添加。24%的患者使用了初始氯胺酮冲击剂量(95mg,IQR 47.5),中位输注率为 30.8mcg/kg/min(IQR 40.4),中位输注时间为 40 小时(IQR 37)。在 84%的患者中,氯胺酮在 24 小时内使 RSE 和发作间期活动的停止率达到 50%,在 43%的患者中完全停止癫痫发作。在线性回归中,氯胺酮前的抗癫痫药物与癫痫发作停止相关(OR 2.6,95%CI 0.9-6.9,p=0.05),而丙泊酚输注则相反(OR 0.02,95%CI 0.001-0.43,p=0.01)。由现场 NCC 进行的 RSE 管理与通过 TNCC 进行的虚拟管理相比,并不会影响癫痫发作停止率。
氯胺酮输注治疗 RSE 可在 24 小时内降低癫痫发作负担,84%的患者癫痫发作减少 50%。无论 RSE 的潜在病因如何,或者是通过 TNCC 还是现场 NCC 进行治疗,其疗效和安全性相似。