Höfler Julia, Rohracher Alexandra, Kalss Gudrun, Zimmermann Georg, Dobesberger Judith, Pilz Georg, Leitinger Markus, Kuchukhidze Giorgi, Butz Kevin, Taylor Alexandra, Novak Helmut, Trinka Eugen
Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Ignaz-Harrer-Str. 79, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria.
CNS Drugs. 2016 Sep;30(9):869-76. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0371-2.
The aim was to describe the safety and efficacy of (S)-ketamine [(S)-KET] in a series of patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus (RSE and SRSE) in a specialized neurological intensive care unit (NICU).
We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with RSE and SRSE treated with (S)-KET in the NICU, Salzburg, Austria, from 2011 to 2015. Data collection included demographic features, clinical presentation, diagnosis, electroencephalogram (EEG) data, anticonvulsant treatment, timing, and duration of treatment with (S)-KET. Outcomes were seizure control and death.
A total of 42 patients (14 women) with RSE and SRSE were treated with (S)-KET. The median duration of status epilepticus (SE) was 10 days [first quartile (Q1) 5.0, Q3 21.0]; the median latency from SE onset to the first administration of (S)-KET was 3 days (Q1 2.0, Q3 6.8). Prior to (S)-KET administration, patients had received a median of two (Q1 2.0, Q3 3.0) anesthetics and three (Q1 2.0, Q3 4.0) antiepileptic drugs. Forty percent of patients (17/42) received propofol: 65 % prior to (S)-KET; 35 % at the same time with (S)-KET. Seven patients received a median bolus of (S)-KET of 200 mg (Q1 200, Q3 250) followed by a continuous infusion, while 35 started with a continuous infusion (maximum rate median 2.55 mg/kg/h; Q1 2.09, Q3 3.22). In 64 % of patients (27/42), (S)-KET was the last drug before SE cessation; in five patients, it was given with propofol at the same time. Median duration of administration was 4 days (Q1 2.0, Q3 6.8). Overall (S)-KET treatment was well tolerated, adverse effects were not observed, and overall mortality was 45.2 %.
Treatment of SRSE in adult patients with (S)-KET led to resolution of status in 64 %. No adverse events were found, indicating a favorable safety profile.
旨在描述(S)-氯胺酮[(S)-KET]在一家专业神经重症监护病房(NICU)中一系列难治性和超难治性癫痫持续状态(RSE和SRSE)患者中的安全性和有效性。
我们回顾性分析了2011年至2015年在奥地利萨尔茨堡NICU接受(S)-KET治疗的RSE和SRSE患者的数据。数据收集包括人口统计学特征、临床表现、诊断、脑电图(EEG)数据、抗惊厥治疗、(S)-KET治疗的时间和持续时间。结局指标为癫痫发作控制和死亡。
共有42例(14名女性)RSE和SRSE患者接受了(S)-KET治疗。癫痫持续状态(SE)的中位持续时间为10天[第一四分位数(Q1)5.0,Q3 21.0];从SE发作到首次给予(S)-KET的中位延迟时间为3天(Q1 2.0,Q3 6.8)。在给予(S)-KET之前,患者接受麻醉剂的中位数为两种(Q1 2.0,Q3 3.0),抗癫痫药物的中位数为三种(Q1 2.0,Q3 4.0)。40%的患者(17/42)接受了丙泊酚:65%在(S)-KET之前;35%与(S)-KET同时使用。7例患者接受(S)-KET的中位推注剂量为200mg(Q1 200,Q3 250),随后持续输注,而35例患者开始时采用持续输注(最大速率中位数为2.55mg/kg/h;Q1 2.09,Q3 3.22)。在64%的患者(27/42)中,(S)-KET是SE停止前的最后一种药物;在5例患者中,它与丙泊酚同时使用。中位给药持续时间为4天(Q1 2.0,Q3 6.8)。总体而言,(S)-KET治疗耐受性良好,未观察到不良反应,总死亡率为45.2%。
成年SRSE患者使用(S)-KET治疗使64%的患者癫痫持续状态得到缓解。未发现不良事件,表明其安全性良好。