Department of Pancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (APHP), CRMR PaRaDis Pancreatic Rare Diseases, Université Paris Cité, Clichy, France.
Centre of Research on Inflammation, INSERM, Paris, France.
Eur Radiol. 2024 Dec;34(12):7650-7658. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10823-3. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
Imaging features of pancreatic acinar cystic transformation (ACT) have been published. We aimed to describe the clinical and radiological characteristics of patients with a presumed pancreatic ACT diagnosis, reappraising the value of these published imaging criteria.
Single-center retrospective study (2003-2021) of consecutive patients with a presumed diagnosis of ACT as suggested by the local expert multidisciplinary case review board. Patients without available imaging (CT or MRI) for review were excluded. Patients were classified into "certain" ACT (if ≥ 2 imaging criteria and no differential diagnosis) or "uncertain" ACT (if ≥ 1 imaging criteria and suggested differential diagnoses).
Sixty-four patients (35 males, [55%]) were included. ACT was considered "certain" for 34 patients (53%) and "uncertain" for 30 patients (47%). The number of ACT criteria did not differ between groups, with 91.2% of patients with ≥ 3 ACT imaging criteria in the "certain" group vs 93.3% in the "uncertain" group (p = 0.88). In the "uncertain" group, the main suggested differentials were branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (18/30 patients, 60%), calcifying chronic pancreatitis (8/30 patients, 27%), both (three patients, 10%) and serous cystadenoma (one patient, 3%). Calcifications were significantly more frequent in the "uncertain" group (89% vs 63% in the "certain" group, p = 0.02).
Published ACT imaging criteria are frequently associated with features suggesting differential diagnoses. They appear insufficient to reach a final diagnosis in a subset of patients.
ACT displays a heterogeneous morphological imaging presentation challenging the non-invasive diagnostic work-up. Physicians' and radiologists' awareness of this entity is important to better understand its natural history and improve non-invasive diagnostic criteria.
The criteria to help diagnose ACT are frequently associated with features suggestive of differentials. The main alternatives suggested when ACT diagnosis was "uncertain" were branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and calcifying chronic pancreatitis. Published ACT diagnostic imaging criteria can be insufficient for a definite non-invasive diagnosis.
胰腺腺泡囊性转化(ACT)的影像学特征已被报道。我们旨在描述经当地专家多学科病例审查委员会初步诊断为胰腺 ACT 患者的临床和影像学特征,重新评估这些已发表的影像学标准的价值。
这是一项 2003 年至 2021 年期间在单中心进行的回顾性研究,连续纳入经当地专家多学科病例审查委员会初步诊断为 ACT 的患者。未提供影像学(CT 或 MRI)供审查的患者被排除在外。患者分为“确定”ACT(如果有≥2 项影像学标准且无鉴别诊断)或“不确定”ACT(如果有≥1 项影像学标准且提示鉴别诊断)。
共纳入 64 例患者(男性 35 例,占 55%)。34 例(53%)患者被认为“确定”为 ACT,30 例(47%)患者为“不确定”。两组的 ACT 标准数量无差异,“确定”组≥3 项 ACT 影像学标准的患者占 91.2%,“不确定”组为 93.3%(p=0.88)。在“不确定”组中,主要的鉴别诊断包括分支胰管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(18/30 例,60%)、钙化性慢性胰腺炎(8/30 例,27%)、两者均有(3 例,10%)和浆液性囊腺瘤(1 例,3%)。“不确定”组中钙化更为常见(89% vs “确定”组的 63%,p=0.02)。
已发表的 ACT 影像学标准常与提示鉴别诊断的特征相关。它们似乎不足以对部分患者做出最终诊断。
ACT 表现出异质性的形态学影像学表现,使非侵入性诊断变得具有挑战性。医生和放射科医生对该疾病的认识非常重要,这有助于了解其自然病史并改进非侵入性诊断标准。
帮助诊断 ACT 的标准常与提示鉴别诊断的特征相关。当 ACT 诊断不确定时,主要的鉴别诊断是分支胰管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤和钙化性慢性胰腺炎。已发表的 ACT 诊断影像学标准可能不足以做出明确的非侵入性诊断。