Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Clinic, Ankara Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara- Türkiye.
Private Practice, Izmir- Türkiye.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Jun;30(6):382-389. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.39470.
This controlled experimental study aimed to compare ectopic replantation with other replantation techniques in a rat model of crush amputations. It also assessed the impact of different replantation methods on the viability of amputates.
Forty male Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups. Groin flaps served as the amputation model. Group 1 un-derwent guillotine-style amputation followed by orthotopic replantation, Group 2 experienced crush-type amputation and orthotopic replantation, Group 3 had crush-type amputation and orthotopic replantation with a vein graft, and Group 4 underwent crush-type amputation followed by ectopic replantation. Flap viability and perfusion rates were assessed on day 3 using an infrared perfusion as-sessment system. The ratio of viable area to total flap area and thrombus formation in the pedicle vessels were evaluated on day 7.
Infrared evaluations on day 3 post-replantation revealed flap perfusion percentages of 73.5% in Group 1, 11.1% in Group 2, 65% in Group 3, and 64.1% in Group 4. Statistical analysis indicated that Group 1 exhibited the highest perfusion rates, while Group 2 showed the lowest. No differences were observed between Groups 3 and 4. On the seventh day, the average surviving flap areas were found to be 74.6% in Group 1, 2.5% in Group 2, 64.5% in Group 3, and 64% in Group 4. Statistically, Group 1 exhibited the best outcomes, while Group 2 had the poorest, with no differences between Groups 3 and 4. Additionally, thrombus formation was observed in the vessels of two animals in Group 1, nine in Group 2, and three each in Groups 3 and 4. Significant statistical differences were noted among the groups.
The results indicate that ectopic replantation and replantation with a vein graft are equally effective. The preferred method for crush-type replantations may depend on the patient's and the amputated limb's conditions. In crush-type amputations, we recommend vein graft repair if the patient's overall condition supports replantation and if crushed segments can be debrided without excessive shortening of the amputated part. If these conditions are not met, temporary ectopic replantation is advised to preserve the amputated limb.
本对照实验研究旨在比较异位再植与挤压性断肢再植模型中其他再植技术,评估不同再植方法对断肢成活率的影响。
40 只雄性 Wistar 白化大鼠分为 4 组。股部皮瓣作为截肢模型。组 1 采用铡刀式截肢,然后原位再植;组 2 行挤压性截肢,然后原位再植;组 3 行挤压性截肢,然后行静脉移植的原位再植;组 4 行挤压性截肢,然后异位再植。第 3 天采用红外线灌注评估系统评估皮瓣存活率和灌注率。第 7 天评估吻合血管内血栓形成和皮瓣成活面积比。
再植后第 3 天的红外线评估显示,组 1 的皮瓣灌注率为 73.5%,组 2 为 11.1%,组 3 为 65%,组 4 为 64.1%。统计学分析表明,组 1 的灌注率最高,组 2 的最低。组 3 和组 4 之间无差异。第 7 天,平均存活皮瓣面积分别为组 1 的 74.6%、组 2 的 2.5%、组 3 的 64.5%和组 4 的 64%。统计学分析表明,组 1 结果最好,组 2 最差,组 3 和组 4 之间无差异。此外,组 1 中有 2 只动物的吻合血管内有血栓形成,组 2 中有 9 只,组 3 和组 4 各有 3 只。各组间差异有统计学意义。
结果表明,异位再植和静脉移植再植同样有效。挤压性再植的首选方法可能取决于患者和截肢肢体的情况。在挤压性截肢中,如果患者的整体状况支持再植,并且可以在不使截肢部分过度缩短的情况下切除挤压段,我们建议进行静脉移植修复。如果这些条件不满足,则建议进行临时异位再植以保存截肢肢体。