Doctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
J Neurophysiol. 2024 Aug 1;132(2):362-374. doi: 10.1152/jn.00046.2024. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
Reactive inhibitory control plays an important role in phenotype of different diseases/different phases of a disease. One candidate electrophysiological marker of inhibitory control is frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA). FAA reflects the relative difference in contralateral frontal brain activity. However, the relationship between FAA and potential behavioral/brain activity indices of reactive inhibitory control is not yet clear. We assessed the relationship between resting-state FAA and indicators of reactive inhibitory control. Additionally, we investigated the effect of modulation of FAA via transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). We implemented a randomized sham-controlled design with 65 healthy humans (M = 23.93, SD = 6.08; 46 female). Before and after 2-mA anodal tDCS of the right frontal site (with the cathode at the contralateral site) for 20 min, we collected EEG data and reactive inhibitory performance in neutral and food-reward conditions, using the stop signal task (SST). There was no support for the effect of tDCS on FAA or any indices of reactive inhibitory control. Our correlation analysis revealed an association between inhibitory brain activity in the food-reward condition and (pre-tDCS) asymmetry. Higher right relative to left frontal brain activity was correlated with reduced early-onset inhibitory activity and, in contrast, linked with higher late-onset inhibitory control in the food-reward condition. Similarly, event-related potential analyses showed reduced early-onset and enhanced late-onset inhibitory brain activity over time, particularly in the food-reward condition. These results suggest that there can be a dissociation regarding the lateralization of frontal brain activity and early- and late-onset inhibitory brain activity. This research reveals dissociation between baseline frontal alpha asymmetry and the timing of reactive inhibitory brain activities in food-reward contexts. Whereas inhibitory control performance decreases over time in a stop signal task, electrophysiological indices show reduced early- and heightened late-onset inhibitory brain activity, especially in the reward condition. Additionally, greater right frontal activity correlates with reduced early-onset and increased late-onset inhibitory brain activity.
反应性抑制控制在不同疾病的表型/疾病不同阶段中起着重要作用。抑制控制的一个候选电生理标志物是额区阿尔法不对称(FAA)。FAA 反映了对侧额区大脑活动的相对差异。然而,FAA 与反应性抑制控制的潜在行为/大脑活动指标之间的关系尚不清楚。我们评估了静息态 FAA 与反应性抑制控制指标之间的关系。此外,我们还研究了经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)调节 FAA 的效果。我们实施了一项随机假刺激对照设计,共有 65 名健康人参与(M = 23.93,SD = 6.08;46 名女性)。在右侧额区(阴极置于对侧)接受 2 mA 阳极 tDCS 刺激 20 分钟前后,我们使用停止信号任务(SST)收集 EEG 数据和中性及食物奖励条件下的反应性抑制表现。tDCS 对 FAA 或任何反应性抑制控制指标均无影响。我们的相关分析表明,食物奖励条件下抑制性大脑活动与(tDCS 前)不对称之间存在关联。与左侧相比,右侧额区大脑活动较高与食物奖励条件下早期抑制活动减少有关,相反,与晚期抑制控制增加有关。同样,事件相关电位分析显示,随着时间的推移,早期和晚期抑制性大脑活动均增加,尤其是在食物奖励条件下。这些结果表明,额区大脑活动的偏侧化与早期和晚期抑制性大脑活动之间可能存在分离。本研究揭示了在食物奖励情境下,额区静息态阿尔法不对称与反应性抑制性大脑活动时间之间的分离。虽然在停止信号任务中,抑制控制表现随时间推移而下降,但电生理指标显示早期和晚期抑制性大脑活动减少,尤其是在奖励条件下。此外,更大的右侧额区活动与早期抑制活动减少和晚期抑制活动增加相关。