Nordholt Sontje, Garrison Philipp, Aichhorn Wolfgang, Ochs Matthias, Schiepek Günter
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Department of Social Work, Fulda University of Applied Sciences, Fulda, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2024 May 28;15:1259610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1259610. eCollection 2024.
Mixed-methods approaches promise a deep understanding of psychotherapeutic processes. This study uses qualitative and quantitative data from daily diary entries and daily self-assessments during inpatient treatment. The aim of the study is to get an insight into the similarities and differences between both types of data and how they represent self-organized pattern transitions in psychotherapy. While a complete correlation of results is not expected, we anticipate observing amplifying and subsidiary patterns from both perspectives.
Daily, five MDD patients wrote diaries and completed self-assessments using the Therapy Process Questionnaire, a questionnaire for monitoring the change dynamics of psychotherapy. The data were collected using the Synergetic Navigation System, an online tool for real-time monitoring. Diary entries of the patients described their experiences in everyday life. The qualitative text analysis was conducted using Mixed Grounded Theory, which provided categories representing the patients' ongoing experiences of transformation and stagnation. The time series data was analyzed using the dynamic complexity algorithm and the pattern transition detection algorithm. Results from qualitative and quantitative analyses were combined and compared. Following the process of data triangulation, the leading perspective came from the theory of self-organization. In addition to presenting the overall results for all five patients, we delve into two specific case examples in greater detail.
Specific and highly diversified diary entries of 5 patients were classified into the categories of perceived pattern stability, noticing improvement, broadening the perspective, critical instability, and experiencing moments of Kairos. Patients reported problems not only related to their disorder (e.g., lack of energy and hopelessness) but also to phases and steps of change, which could be related to the theory of self-organization (e.g., problem attractors, critical fluctuations, pattern transitions, and Kairos). Qualitative and quantitative analysis provide important supplementary results without being redundant or identical.
Data triangulation allows for a comprehensive and multi-perspective understanding of therapeutic change dynamics. The different topics expressed in the diary entries especially help to follow micro-psychological processes, which are far from being a simple reaction to interventions. The way patients experience themselves being in stability or instability and stagnation or transformation is surprisingly close to the general features of self-organizing processes in complex systems.
混合方法有望深入理解心理治疗过程。本研究使用住院治疗期间每日日记条目和每日自我评估的定性和定量数据。该研究的目的是深入了解这两种类型数据之间的异同,以及它们如何在心理治疗中呈现自组织模式转变。虽然预计结果不会完全相关,但我们预期从两个角度观察到放大和辅助模式。
每天,5名重度抑郁症患者撰写日记,并使用治疗过程问卷完成自我评估,该问卷用于监测心理治疗的变化动态。数据通过协同导航系统收集,这是一个用于实时监测的在线工具。患者的日记条目描述了他们在日常生活中的经历。定性文本分析采用混合扎根理论进行,该理论提供了代表患者持续的转变和停滞经历的类别。时间序列数据使用动态复杂性算法和模式转变检测算法进行分析。定性和定量分析的结果进行了合并和比较。在数据三角剖分过程之后,主导观点来自自组织理论。除了展示所有5名患者的总体结果外,我们还更详细地深入研究了两个具体案例。
5名患者具体且高度多样化的日记条目被归类为感知模式稳定性、注意到改善、拓宽视野、临界不稳定性和体验契机时刻等类别。患者报告的问题不仅与他们的疾病有关(例如,缺乏精力和绝望),还与变化的阶段和步骤有关,这可能与自组织理论有关(例如,问题吸引子、临界波动、模式转变和契机)。定性和定量分析提供了重要的补充结果,既不冗余也不相同。
数据三角剖分有助于全面、多视角地理解治疗变化动态。日记条目中表达的不同主题尤其有助于追踪微观心理过程,这些过程远非对干预的简单反应。患者体验自身处于稳定或不稳定、停滞或转变状态的方式惊人地接近复杂系统中自组织过程的一般特征。