Begum Jasmina, Mitra Subarna
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
J Family Reprod Health. 2024 Mar;18(1):20-29. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v18i1.15435.
A cesarean delivery is regarded as a comparatively favourable and secure approach to childbirth when contrasted with vaginal delivery. Over the past decade, its frequency has risen in both industrialized and developing nations. Maternal request for cesarean delivery has been explained for the escalating rate along with other factors like anxiety, fear of childbirth, previous cesarean delivery, previous negative vaginal birth experience, maternal age, maternal education, and socioeconomic factors. Hence, this study was undertaken to assess pregnant women's tendency to have a cesarean birth and to investigate the factors associated with the inclination for cesarean delivery.
A hospital-based cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of a tertiary care hospital, a systematic sampling procedure was utilized, and 368 antenatal mothers after 36 weeks of gestation, who do not have any specific medical reasons against vaginal delivery were included in the study. Data collection was done by questionnaire. The information regarding socio-demographic factors, preexisting comorbidities, current obstetric risk factors, emotional factors, previous delivery experience, and their information preference toward the mode of delivery were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify the independent variables associated with preference for cesarean delivery.
The preference for cesarean delivery and non-preference for cesarean delivery was 114 (30.9%) and 201 (54.6%), respectively whereas 53 (14.4%) participants remained neutral. The Chi-square analysis revealed a notable connection between the inclination towards a preference for cesarean delivery and factors such as obstetric score, parity, comorbidities, and among obstetric risk factors such as pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization (IVF), with a history of abortion, and having a prior history of cesarean delivery. Nevertheless, no meaningful association was observed between the preference for cesarean delivery and the remaining variables. On multivariate logistic analysis, independent variables like preexisting anxiety or depression, pregnancy through IVF, and having a history of previous cesarean delivery have increased the odds of preferring cesarean delivery. The independent variables like increasing gestational age, graduates, and unemployed have decreased the odds of preferring a cesarean delivery.
In conclusion, the prevalence of cesarean delivery is influenced by a complex interplay of medical, cultural, socioeconomic, and healthcare system factors. While cesarean delivery is essential in cases of medical necessity, efforts should be made to avoid unnecessary cesarean delivery that does not provide clear benefits over vaginal delivery. Balancing the risks and benefits of cesarean delivery and promoting evidence-based obstetric practices are crucial for ensuring optimal maternal and infant outcomes.
与阴道分娩相比,剖宫产被视为一种相对有利且安全的分娩方式。在过去十年中,其发生率在工业化国家和发展中国家均有所上升。产妇要求剖宫产的比例不断攀升,这一现象除了其他因素外,还与焦虑、害怕分娩、既往剖宫产史、既往阴道分娩不良经历、产妇年龄、产妇教育程度以及社会经济因素等有关。因此,本研究旨在评估孕妇选择剖宫产的倾向,并调查与剖宫产倾向相关的因素。
在一家三级护理医院的妇产科进行了一项基于医院的横断面研究,采用系统抽样程序,纳入了368名妊娠36周后的产前母亲,她们没有任何反对阴道分娩的特殊医学原因。通过问卷调查收集数据。收集了有关社会人口学因素、既往合并症、当前产科危险因素、情绪因素、既往分娩经历以及她们对分娩方式的信息偏好等信息。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定与剖宫产偏好相关的独立变量。
选择剖宫产和不选择剖宫产的比例分别为114例(30.9%)和201例(54.6%),而53例(14.4%)参与者态度中立。卡方分析显示,倾向于选择剖宫产与产科评分、产次、合并症等因素以及体外受精(IVF)后妊娠、有流产史和有剖宫产史等产科危险因素之间存在显著关联。然而,在剖宫产偏好与其余变量之间未观察到有意义的关联。多因素逻辑分析显示,既往焦虑或抑郁、通过IVF妊娠以及有既往剖宫产史等独立变量增加了选择剖宫产的几率。孕周增加、毕业生和失业等独立变量降低了选择剖宫产的几率。
总之,剖宫产的发生率受到医学、文化、社会经济和医疗保健系统等多种因素复杂相互作用的影响。虽然在有医学必要的情况下剖宫产至关重要,但应努力避免那些相对于阴道分娩并无明显益处的不必要剖宫产。平衡剖宫产的风险和益处并推广基于证据的产科实践对于确保最佳母婴结局至关重要。