• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性对剖宫产的偏好:发生率及相关因素。

Women's preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors.

作者信息

Gamble J A, Creedy D K

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing and Health, Griffith University, Logan Campus, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland 4131, Australia.

出版信息

Birth. 2001 Jun;28(2):101-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00101.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00101.x
PMID:11380381
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined women's preferences for birth. The object of this study was to determine the incidence of women's preferred type of birth, and the reasons and factors associated with their preference.

METHODS

Three hundred and ten women between 36 and 40 weeks' gestation were recruited from the antenatal clinic of a major metropolitan teaching hospital and the consulting rooms of six private obstetricians in Brisbane, Australia. Participants completed a questionnaire asking about their preferred type of birth, reasons for their preference, preparation for childbirth, level of anxiety and concerns, and the influence of the primary caregiver.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety women (93.5%) preferred a spontaneous vaginal birth; 20 women (6.4%) preferred a cesarean section. Of the latter group, most had a current obstetric complication or experienced a previously complicated delivery (p <0.001); 1 woman (0.3%) preferred a cesarean section in the absence of any known current or previous obstetric complication. Women who preferred a cesarean section were more anxious, were generally poorly informed of the risks of this procedure, and/or overestimated the safety of the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who preferred a cesarean section were more likely to have experienced this type of birth previously and to have negative feelings about it. To decrease women's preference for a cesarean section, practitioners should reduce the primary cesarean delivery rate and improve the quality of emotional care for women who require a cesarean section. Caregivers should engage in a sensitive discussion of the risks and benefits of various birth options, including a vaginal birth after cesarean, with women who have previously experienced a cesarean birth before they make decisions about mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy.

摘要

背景

很少有研究探讨女性对分娩方式的偏好。本研究的目的是确定女性偏好的分娩方式的发生率,以及与其偏好相关的原因和因素。

方法

从澳大利亚布里斯班一家大型都市教学医院的产前诊所和六位私人产科医生的诊室招募了310名妊娠36至40周的女性。参与者完成了一份问卷,询问她们偏好的分娩方式、偏好的原因、分娩准备、焦虑和担忧程度以及主要照顾者的影响。

结果

290名女性(93.5%)偏好自然阴道分娩;20名女性(6.4%)偏好剖宫产。在后一组中,大多数人目前有产科并发症或曾经历过复杂分娩(p<0.001);1名女性(0.3%)在没有任何已知的当前或既往产科并发症的情况下偏好剖宫产。偏好剖宫产的女性更焦虑,对该手术风险的了解普遍不足,和/或高估了该手术的安全性。

结论

偏好剖宫产的女性更有可能此前经历过这种分娩方式并对其有负面感受。为了降低女性对剖宫产的偏好,从业者应降低初次剖宫产率,并提高对需要剖宫产的女性的情感护理质量。在有剖宫产史的女性决定后续妊娠的分娩方式之前,护理人员应与她们就包括剖宫产术后阴道分娩在内的各种分娩选择的风险和益处进行敏感的讨论。

相似文献

1
Women's preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors.女性对剖宫产的偏好:发生率及相关因素。
Birth. 2001 Jun;28(2):101-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00101.x.
2
Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.首次分娩对女性分娩方式偏好变化的影响:一项纵向观察性研究的随访
Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):121-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00225.x.
3
Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.既往剖宫产术后分娩方式的选择——一项调查瑞士西部女性偏好的在线调查
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
4
Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean.剖宫产术后知情分娩决策辅助工具的随机对照试验:为分娩做出选择
Birth. 2005 Dec;32(4):252-61. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00383.x.
5
Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.背后的真相——在不存在医学或产科因素的情况下,很少有女性选择剖宫产。
Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):620-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
6
Information for women after CS: are they getting enough?剖宫产术后女性的信息:她们获取的信息足够吗?
RCM Midwives. 2004 Nov;7(11):472-5.
7
Pregnant women's preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth - a six-country cohort study.孕妇对剖宫产及后续分娩方式的偏好——一项六国队列研究。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Sep;37(3):75-83. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2016.1181055.
8
Maternal request for cesarean section due to fear of birth: can it be changed through crisis-oriented counseling?因害怕分娩而提出剖宫产的产妇:能否通过以危机为导向的咨询来改变?
Birth. 2006 Sep;33(3):221-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00107.x.
9
The opinion of Brazilian women regarding vaginal labor and cesarean section.巴西女性对顺产和剖宫产的看法。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Nov;75 Suppl 1:S59-66.
10
Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?智利女性对分娩方式的偏好:她们更喜欢哪种方式以及原因是什么?
BJOG. 2006 Nov;113(11):1253-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01069.x. Epub 2006 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Geographically weighted regression analysis of cesarean delivery using the Ethiopian Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2019.利用2019年埃塞俄比亚微型人口与健康调查对剖宫产进行地理加权回归分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 13;15(1):5338. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87962-0.
2
Preferred mode of childbirth among women attending antenatal clinic at a tertiary hospital in Ghana: a cross-sectional study.加纳一家三级医院产前保健门诊孕妇的首选分娩方式:一项横断面研究。
Afr Health Sci. 2022 Jun;22(2):480-488. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v22i2.56.
3
Spatial and hierarchical Bayesian analysis to identify factors associated with caesarean delivery use in Ethiopia: Evidence from national population and health facility data.
空间和层次贝叶斯分析在识别与埃塞俄比亚剖宫产使用相关因素中的应用:来自国家人口和卫生设施数据的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 17;17(11):e0277885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277885. eCollection 2022.
4
Multilevel analysis to identify the factors associated with caesarean section in Bangladesh: evidence from a nationally representative survey.多水平分析确定与孟加拉国剖宫产相关的因素:来自全国代表性调查的证据。
Int Health. 2023 Jan 3;15(1):30-36. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihac006.
5
Giving birth: A hermeneutic study of the expectations and experiences of healthy primigravid women in Switzerland.分娩:瑞士健康初产妇期望与体验的阐释学研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0261902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261902. eCollection 2022.
6
Indications and Determinants of Cesarean Section: A Cross-Sectional Study.剖宫产的指征与决定因素:一项横断面研究
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;10(4):280-285. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_3_20. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
7
Experience of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Phenomenological Study.剖宫产术后阴道分娩的经历:一项现象学研究。
J Perinat Educ. 2019 Jul 1;28(3):131-141. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.28.3.131.
8
Evidence of overuse? Patterns of obstetric interventions during labour and birth among Australian mothers.过度使用的证据?澳大利亚母亲分娩期间产科干预的模式。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2369-5.
9
Secular changes in body height predict global rates of caesarean section.人体身高的长期变化可预测全球剖宫产率。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Feb 13;286(1896):20182425. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2425.
10
How is women's demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review.如何衡量女性对剖宫产的需求?系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 6;14(3):e0213352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213352. eCollection 2019.