• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CHOP vs MEV for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of unfavourable histopathology: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Hagberg H, Björkholm M, Glimelius B, Lindemalm C, Mellstedt H, Killander A

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1985 Feb;21(2):175-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(85)90169-5.

DOI:10.1016/0277-5379(85)90169-5
PMID:3886392
Abstract

The Swedish Lymphoma Study Group has compared the results of treatment with a CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisone) with those of treatment with a MEV regimen (methotrexate, cyclophosphamide and vincristine) in patients suffering from generalized non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) of unfavourable histopathology in a prospective randomized trial. The complete remission rate for 67 evaluable patients receiving CHOP was higher (61%) than for 74 patients receiving MEV (24%) (P less than 0.001). The relapse rate was 18/41 (44%) in the CHOP group and 11/18 (61%) in the MEV group (difference not significant). At follow-up the number of patients alive in a first complete remission was thus 23/67 in the CHOP group but only 7/74 (9%) in the MEV group. This difference is highly significant (P less than 0.001). However, there is still no significant difference in overall survival between the two treatment groups. This is probably due to the more efficient rescue treatment (mainly CHOP) found in the patients who primarily received MEV than in those who primarily received CHOP. It is concluded that the CHOP regimen is superior to the MEV regimen in NHL patients with unfavourable histopathology.

摘要

相似文献

1
CHOP vs MEV for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of unfavourable histopathology: a randomized clinical trial.
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1985 Feb;21(2):175-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(85)90169-5.
2
Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.标准方案(CHOP)与三种强化化疗方案治疗晚期非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):1002-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281404.
3
Effects of Mega-COMLA (cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, vincristine, and methotrexate followed by leucovorin and prednisone) plus CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in the treatment of lymphoid neoplasms with very poor prognosis.大剂量COMLA(环磷酰胺、阿糖胞苷、长春新碱和甲氨蝶呤,随后使用亚叶酸钙和泼尼松)联合CHOP(环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松)治疗预后极差的淋巴瘤的疗效
Cancer Treat Rep. 1986 Aug;70(8):953-8.
4
[Induction of remission in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphomas with high degree of malignancy - preliminary comparison of 2 chemotherapy programs: CHOP-B (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, encorton, bleomycin) and MEV-A (methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and adriamycin)].[高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者缓解诱导——两种化疗方案的初步比较:CHOP - B(环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱、恩考芬、博来霉素)和MEV - A(甲氨蝶呤、环磷酰胺、长春新碱和阿霉素)]
Nowotwory. 1983 Jul-Sep;33(3):259-65.
5
[Clinical randomized comparative trial of ProMACE-CytaBOM regimen and CHOP regimen in treating non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].普罗梅塞-赛塔博姆方案与CHOP方案治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤的临床随机对照试验
Ai Zheng. 2005 Apr;24(4):461-4.
6
A pilot study of cyclical chemotherapy with high-dose methotrexate and CHOP (MTX-CHOP) in poor-prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).一项针对预后不良的非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)采用大剂量甲氨蝶呤与CHOP方案(MTX-CHOP)进行周期性化疗的初步研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1983;11(3):153-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00254195.
7
Treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue.复发侵袭性淋巴瘤的治疗:含与不含高剂量治疗及干细胞救援的方案
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2002 May;49 Suppl 1:S13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00280-002-0447-1. Epub 2002 Apr 12.
8
Advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Analysis of prognostic factors by the international index and by lactic dehydrogenase in an intergroup study.晚期弥漫性非霍奇金淋巴瘤。在一项多组研究中通过国际预后指数和乳酸脱氢酶分析预后因素。
Cancer. 1995 Feb 1;75(3):865-73. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950201)75:3<865::aid-cncr2820750319>3.0.co;2-z.
9
Phase III trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) versus cisplatin, etoposide, bleomycin and prednisone (CisEBP) for the treatment of advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of high grade malignancy. The Danish Lymphoma Study Group.环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松(CHOP方案)对比顺铂、依托泊苷、博来霉素和泼尼松(CisEBP方案)治疗晚期高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的III期试验。丹麦淋巴瘤研究组。
Acta Oncol. 1990;29(8):995-9. doi: 10.3109/02841869009091789.
10
[A comparative study of mitoxantrone and adriamycin in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a preliminary result].米托蒽醌与阿霉素治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤的对比研究:初步结果
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1986 Sep;13(9):2813-9.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized controlled trial investigating the survival benefit of dose-intensified multidrug combination chemotherapy (LSG9) for intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9002.一项关于剂量强化多药联合化疗(LSG9)对中或高度非霍奇金淋巴瘤生存获益的随机对照试验:日本临床肿瘤学组研究9002。
Int J Hematol. 2004 Nov;80(4):341-50. doi: 10.1532/ijh97.04085.
2
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in immunocompromised patients.免疫功能低下患者的抗菌预防
Drugs. 1987;34 Suppl 1:131-3. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198700341-00028.
3
Response-oriented therapy with CHOP and VIM-Bleo in high-grade malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.
CHOP方案与VIM-Bleo方案用于高级别恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的反应导向治疗。
Blut. 1988 Jun;56(6):269-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00320288.