Yang Xiaochen, Cao Wangnan, Lin Haoxiang, Zhang Lanchao, Lin Yuxin, Chen Ziyan, Chang Chun
Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China.
Institute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jun 18;56(3):479-486. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.03.015.
To assess cigarette demand among Chinese smokers through a cigarette purchase task (CPT) and to evaluate cigarette prices under different hypothetical scenarios in order to meet the goals of smoking prevalence reduction in China.
In the study, 447 participants completed a hypothetical CPT at baseline assessments of a trial, thus, cigarette demand curves were individually fitted for each participant using an exponentiated version of the exponential demand model. Typically, five demand indices were derived, intensity (consumption when free), breakpoint (first price at which consumption is suppressed to 0), maximum output (Omax), maximum price (Pmax, price at which Omax occurred), and elasticity (the ratio of the change in quantity demanded to the change in price). A one-way analysis of variance was used to explore the correlations between the cigarette purchase task indices and socio-demographic and smoking characteristics. The one-way decay model was employed to simulate the smoking cessation rates and determine optimal cigarette prices in a series of scenarios for achieving 20% smoking prevalence.
The price elasticity drawn from CPT was 0.54, indicating that a 10% price increase could reduce smoking by 5.4% in the participated smokers. Smokers with higher income were less sensitive to cigarette prices (elasticity=-2.31, =0.028). Cigarette purchase task indices varied significantly among the smokers with different prices of commonly used cigarettes, tobacco dependence, and smoking volume. The smokers who consumed cigarettes of higher prices reported higher breakpoint, Omax and Pmax, but lower intensity (=0.001). The smokers who were moderately or highly nicotine dependent reported higher intensity, breakpoint, Omax and Pmax, and they had lower intensity (=0.001). The smokers who had a higher volume of cigarettes reported higher intensity and Omax, and lower intensity ( < 0.001). To achieve the goal of reducing smoking prevalence to 20% in mainland China, we estimated the desired increase on smoking cessation rate and prices accordingly in a series of scenarios, considering the gender variance and reduced smoking initiation. In scenario (a), to achieve a smoking prevalence goal of 20%, it would be necessary for 24.81% of the current smokers to quit smoking when there were no new smokers. Our fitting model yielded a corresponding value of 59.64 yuan (95% 53.13-67.24). Given the assumption in scenario (b) that only males quitted smoking, the desired cessation rates would be 25.82%, with a higher corresponding price of 62.15 yuan (95% 55.40-70.06) to induce desired cessation rates. In the proposed scenario (c) where 40 percent of the reduction in smoking prevalence came from reduced smoking initiation, and females and males equally quitted smoking due to increased cigarette prices, the price of a pack of cigarettes would be at least 37.36 yuan (95% 32.32-42.69) (equals to $ 5.20) per pack to achieve the cessation rate of 14.89 percent. In scenario (d) where only males quitted smoking due to increased cigarette prices considering the reduced smoking initiation, the respective smoking cessation rates should be 15.49% with the desired prices of 38.60 yuan (95% 33.53-44.02). After adjusting for education levels and income levels in scenario (c), the price of cigarettes would be at least 37.37 yuan/pack (equals to $ 5.20) (95% 30.73-44.94) and 37.84 yuan/pack (equals to $ 5.26) (95% 31.94-44.53), respectively.
Cigarette purchase task indices are significantly associated with income levels and prices of commonly used cigarettes, levels of tobacco dependence, and smoking volume, which is inspiring in studying price factors that influence smoking behavior. It is suggested that higher cigarette prices, surpassing the current actual market level, is imperative in mainland China. Stronger policy stra-tegies should be taken to increase tobacco taxes and retail cigarette prices to achieve the Healthy China 2030 goal of reducing smoking prevalence to 20%.
通过卷烟购买任务(CPT)评估中国吸烟者的卷烟需求,并评估不同假设情景下的卷烟价格,以实现中国降低吸烟率的目标。
在该研究中,447名参与者在一项试验的基线评估时完成了一项假设的CPT,因此,使用指数需求模型的指数形式为每个参与者单独拟合卷烟需求曲线。通常,得出五个需求指数,即强度(免费时的消费量)、断点(消费量被抑制至0的首个价格)、最大产量(Omax)、最高价格(Pmax,出现Omax时的价格)和弹性(需求量变化与价格变化的比率)。采用单因素方差分析来探讨卷烟购买任务指数与社会人口统计学及吸烟特征之间的相关性。采用单向衰减模型来模拟戒烟率,并确定一系列情景下的最优卷烟价格,以实现20%的吸烟率目标。
从CPT得出的价格弹性为0.54,表明价格上涨10%可使参与研究的吸烟者吸烟量减少5.4%。收入较高的吸烟者对卷烟价格不太敏感(弹性=-2.31,P=0.028)。在常用卷烟价格不同、烟草依赖程度和吸烟量不同的吸烟者中,卷烟购买任务指数存在显著差异。消费较高价格卷烟的吸烟者报告的断点、Omax和Pmax较高,但强度较低(P=0.001)。中度或高度尼古丁依赖的吸烟者报告的强度、断点、Omax和Pmax较高,且强度较低(P=0.001)。吸烟量较大的吸烟者报告的强度和Omax较高,强度较低(P<0.001)。为实现中国大陆吸烟率降至20%的目标,我们在一系列情景中相应地估计了所需的戒烟率提高幅度和价格,同时考虑了性别差异和吸烟起始率降低的情况。在情景(a)中,若没有新吸烟者,要实现20%的吸烟率目标,当前吸烟者中有24.81%必须戒烟。我们的拟合模型得出相应价格为5,9.64元(95%置信区间为53.13 - 67.24元)。假设在情景(b)中只有男性戒烟,所需的戒烟率将为25.82%,相应的较高价格为62.15元(95%置信区间为55.40 - 70.06元)以诱导出所需的戒烟率。在提议的情景(c)中,吸烟率降低的40%来自吸烟起始率降低,且由于卷烟价格上涨,女性和男性同等程度地戒烟,要实现14.89%的戒烟率,每包卷烟价格至少应为37.36元(95%置信区间为32.32 - 42.6,9元)(相当于5.20美元)。在情景(d)中,考虑到吸烟起始率降低,仅男性因卷烟价格上涨而戒烟,相应的戒烟率应为15.49%,所需价格为38.60元(95%置信区间为33.53 - 44.02元)。在情景(c)中调整教育水平和收入水平后,卷烟价格分别至少为37.37元/包(相当于5.20美元)(95%置信区间为30.73 - 44.94元)和37.84元/包(相当于5.26美元)(95%置信区间为31.94 - 44.53元)。
卷烟购买任务指数与收入水平、常用卷烟价格、烟草依赖程度和吸烟量显著相关,这对于研究影响吸烟行为的价格因素具有启发意义。建议中国大陆提高卷烟价格,使其超过当前实际市场水平。应采取更强有力的政策策略提高烟草税和零售卷烟价格,以实现“健康中国2030”将吸烟率降至20%的目标。