Suppr超能文献

随机分组前癫痫发作次数的评估充分考察了吡仑帕奈治疗原发性全面强直-阵挛发作的安全性和耐受性。

Time to prerandomization seizure count design sufficiently assessed the safety and tolerability of perampanel for the treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2024 Aug;65(8):2412-2422. doi: 10.1111/epi.18023. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Static assignment of participants in randomized clinical trials to placebo or ineffective treatment confers risk from continued seizures. An alternative trial design of time to exceed prerandomization monthly seizure count (T-PSC) has replicated the efficacy conclusions of traditionally designed trials, with shorter exposure to placebo and ineffective treatment. Trials aim to evaluate efficacy as well as safety and tolerability; therefore, we evaluated whether this T-PSC design also could replicate the trial's safety and tolerability conclusions.

METHODS

We retrospectively applied the T-PSC design to analyze treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from a blinded, placebo-controlled trial of perampanel for primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (NCT01393743). The safety analysis set consisted of 81 and 82 participants randomized to perampanel and placebo arms, respectively. We evaluated the incidences of TEAEs, treatment-related TEAEs, serious TEAEs, and TEAEs of special interest that occurred before T-PSC relative to those observed during the full-length trial.

RESULTS

Of the 67 and 59 participants who experienced TEAEs in the perampanel and placebo arms during full-length trial, 66 (99%) and 54 (92%) participants experienced TEAEs with onset occurring before T-PSC, respectively. When limited to treatment-related TEAEs, 55 of 56 (98%) and 32 of 37 (86%) participants reported treatment-related TEAEs that occurred before T-PSC in the perampanel and placebo arms, respectively. There were more TEAEs after T-PSC with placebo as compared to perampanel (Fisher exact odds ratio = 8.6, p = .035), which resulted in overestimation of the difference in TEAE rate. There was a numerical reduction in serious TEAEs (3/13 occurred after T-PSC, one in placebo and two in perampanel).

SIGNIFICANCE

Almost all TEAEs occurred before T-PSC. More treatment-related TEAEs occurred after T-PSC for participants randomized to placebo than perampanel, which may be due to either a shorter T-PSC or delayed time to TEAE for placebo.

摘要

目的

将随机临床试验中的参与者静态分配到安慰剂或无效治疗组会增加持续癫痫发作的风险。替代的试验设计是超过预先随机每月发作次数(T-PSC)的时间,该设计复制了传统设计试验的疗效结论,同时减少了安慰剂和无效治疗的暴露。试验旨在评估疗效以及安全性和耐受性;因此,我们评估了这种 T-PSC 设计是否也可以复制试验的安全性和耐受性结论。

方法

我们回顾性地将 T-PSC 设计应用于一项关于吡仑帕奈治疗原发性全面强直阵挛发作的盲法、安慰剂对照试验(NCT01393743)中,以分析治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAEs)。安全性分析集包括分别随机分配到吡仑帕奈和安慰剂组的 81 名和 82 名参与者。我们评估了 T-PSC 之前和整个试验期间发生的 TEAEs、与治疗相关的 TEAEs、严重 TEAEs 和特别关注的 TEAEs 的发生率。

结果

在整个试验期间,吡仑帕奈组和安慰剂组分别有 67 名和 59 名参与者出现 TEAEs,其中 66 名(99%)和 54 名(92%)参与者的 TEAEs 发生在 T-PSC 之前。当仅限于与治疗相关的 TEAEs 时,吡仑帕奈组和安慰剂组分别有 55 名(98%)和 32 名(86%)参与者报告 T-PSC 之前发生的与治疗相关的 TEAEs。与吡仑帕奈相比,安慰剂组在 T-PSC 后出现更多的 TEAEs(Fisher 确切概率比=8.6,p=0.035),这导致 TEAEs 发生率的差异被高估。严重 TEAEs 数量减少(3/13 发生在 T-PSC 后,1 例在安慰剂组,2 例在吡仑帕奈组)。

意义

几乎所有的 TEAEs 都发生在 T-PSC 之前。与吡仑帕奈相比,随机分配到安慰剂组的参与者在 T-PSC 后发生更多的与治疗相关的 TEAEs,这可能是由于 T-PSC 较短或安慰剂的 TEAEs 出现时间延迟。

相似文献

4
Treatments for seizures in catamenial (menstrual-related) epilepsy.月经性(与月经相关)癫痫发作的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 16;9(9):CD013225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013225.pub3.
10
Perampanel add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.添加氨己烯酸治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 14;4(4):CD010961. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010961.pub2.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验