Suppr超能文献

利福喷丁和其他利福霉素类药物对 的疗效。

Efficacy of rifapentine and other rifamycins against .

机构信息

Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):e0103424. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01034-24. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Since 1999, doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine have been the recommended treatment for chronic Q fever, a life-threatening disease caused by the bacterial pathogen, . Despite the duration of its use, the treatment is not ideal due to the lengthy treatment time, high mortality rate, resistant strains, and the potential for contraindicated usage. A literature search was conducted to identify studies that screened large panels of drugs against to identify novel targets with potential efficacy against . Twelve candidate antimicrobials approved for use in humans by the US Food and Drug Administration were selected and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined against the low virulence strain Nine Mile phase II. Rifabutin and rifaximin were the best performing antibiotics tested with MICs of ≤0.01 µg mL. Further screening of these top candidates was conducted alongside two drugs from the same class, rifampin, well-characterized and rifapentine, not previously reported against . These were screened against virulent strains of representing three clinically relevant genotypes. Rifapentine was the most effective in the human monocytic leukemia cell line, THP-1, with a MIC ≤0.01 µg mL. In the human kidney epithelial cell line, A-498, efficacy of rifapentine, rifampin, and rifabutin varied across strains with MICs between ≤0.001 and 0.01 µg mL. Rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine were all bactericidal against ; however, rifabutin and rifapentine demonstrated impressive bactericidal activity as low as 0.1 µg mL and should be further explored as alternative Q fever treatments given their efficacy .

IMPORTANCE

This work will help inform investigators and physicians about potential alternative antimicrobial therapies targeting the causative agent of Q fever, . Chronic Q fever is difficult to treat, and alternative antimicrobials are needed. This manuscript explores the efficacy of rifamycin antibiotics against virulent strains of representing three clinically relevant genotypes . Importantly, this study determines the susceptibility of to rifapentine, which has not been previously reported. Evaluation of the bactericidal activity of the rifamycins reveals that rifabutin and rifapentine are bactericidal at low concentrations, which is unusual for antibiotics against .

摘要

未加标签

自 1999 年以来,多西环素和羟氯喹一直是慢性 Q 热的推荐治疗方法,慢性 Q 热是一种由细菌病原体引起的危及生命的疾病。尽管已经使用了很长时间,但由于治疗时间长、死亡率高、耐药菌株以及潜在的禁忌使用,这种治疗方法并不理想。进行了文献检索,以确定筛选大量药物对抗的研究,以确定具有针对的潜在疗效的新靶标。选择了美国食品和药物管理局批准用于人类的 12 种候选抗菌药物,并确定了对低毒力菌株九英里二期的最低抑菌浓度 (MIC)。利福布汀和利福昔明是测试中表现最好的抗生素,MIC 为≤0.01μg/mL。对这些首选候选药物进行了进一步筛选,同时对同一类别的两种药物进行了筛选,利福平,特征明确,利福喷丁,以前没有报道过针对。这些药物针对代表三种临床相关基因型的毒力菌株进行了筛选。利福喷丁在人单核细胞白血病细胞系 THP-1 中最有效,MIC≤0.01μg/mL。在人肾上皮细胞系 A-498 中,利福喷丁、利福平利福布汀的疗效因菌株而异,MIC 在 0.001 至 0.01μg/mL 之间。利福平、利福布汀和利福喷丁对均具有杀菌作用;然而,利福布汀和利福喷丁的杀菌活性令人印象深刻,低至 0.1μg/mL,鉴于其疗效,应进一步探索作为慢性 Q 热的替代治疗方法。

重要性

这项工作将帮助研究人员和医生了解针对 Q 热病原体的潜在替代抗菌治疗方法。慢性 Q 热难以治疗,需要替代的抗菌药物。本文探讨了利福霉素抗生素对代表三种临床相关基因型的毒力菌株的疗效。重要的是,本研究确定了利福喷丁对的敏感性,这是以前没有报道过的。对利福霉素杀菌活性的评估表明,利福布汀和利福喷丁在低浓度下具有杀菌作用,这对于针对的抗生素来说是不寻常的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ab/11218529/fa5c7b975445/spectrum.01034-24.f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验