• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻腔微生物群是重症监护病房脓毒症的潜在诊断生物标志物。

The nasal microbiota is a potential diagnostic biomarker for sepsis in critical care units.

机构信息

Division of Infection Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):e0344123. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03441-23. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1128/spectrum.03441-23
PMID:38864649
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11218442/
Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the composition of intestinal and nasal microbiota in septic patients and identify potential microbial biomarkers for diagnosis. A total of 157 subjects, including 89 with sepsis, were enrolled from the affiliated hospital. Nasal swabs and fecal specimens were collected from septic and non-septic patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. DNA was extracted, and the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced using Illumina technology. Bioinformatics analysis, statistical processing, and machine learning techniques were employed to differentiate between septic and non-septic patients. The nasal microbiota of septic patients exhibited significantly lower community richness ( = 0.002) and distinct compositions ( = 0.001) compared to non-septic patients. , , , and were identified as enriched genera in the nasal microbiota of septic patients. The constructed machine learning model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 89.08, indicating its efficacy in differentiating septic and non-septic patients. Importantly, model validation demonstrated the effectiveness of the nasal microecological diagnosis prediction model with an AUC of 84.79, while the gut microecological diagnosis prediction model had poor predictive performance (AUC = 49.24). The nasal microbiota of ICU patients effectively distinguishes sepsis from non-septic cases and outperforms the gut microbiota. These findings have implications for the development of diagnostic strategies and advancements in critical care medicine.IMPORTANCEThe important clinical significance of this study is that it compared the intestinal and nasal microbiota of sepsis with non-sepsis patients and determined that the nasal microbiota is more effective than the intestinal microbiota in distinguishing patients with sepsis from those without sepsis, based on the difference in the lines of nasal specimens collected.

摘要

本研究旨在描述脓毒症患者肠道和鼻腔微生物群落的组成,并鉴定潜在的微生物生物标志物用于诊断。共纳入了 157 名患者,其中 89 名为脓毒症患者,均来自附属医院。采集 ICU 和呼吸与危重症医学科的脓毒症和非脓毒症患者的鼻腔拭子和粪便标本。提取 DNA,使用 Illumina 技术扩增和测序 16S rRNA 基因 V4 区。采用生物信息学分析、统计处理和机器学习技术来区分脓毒症和非脓毒症患者。与非脓毒症患者相比,脓毒症患者的鼻腔微生物群落丰富度显著降低( = 0.002),且组成明显不同( = 0.001)。在脓毒症患者的鼻腔微生物群落中, 、 、 、 和 被鉴定为富集菌属。构建的机器学习模型的 AUC 为 89.08,表明其在区分脓毒症和非脓毒症患者方面具有较好的效果。重要的是,模型验证表明,鼻腔微生态诊断预测模型的有效性良好,AUC 为 84.79,而肠道微生态诊断预测模型的预测性能较差(AUC = 49.24)。ICU 患者的鼻腔微生物群落能够有效地将脓毒症与非脓毒症病例区分开来,其性能优于肠道微生物群落。这些发现对于开发诊断策略和推动重症医学的发展具有重要意义。

重要性

本研究的重要临床意义在于,通过比较脓毒症和非脓毒症患者的肠道和鼻腔微生物群落,发现基于鼻腔标本采集线的不同,鼻腔微生物群落比肠道微生物群落更有效地将脓毒症患者与非脓毒症患者区分开来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f53/11218442/496eb5e6a468/spectrum.03441-23.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f53/11218442/cd578d1e2235/spectrum.03441-23.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f53/11218442/407b13b23432/spectrum.03441-23.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f53/11218442/79374ea276ec/spectrum.03441-23.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f53/11218442/496eb5e6a468/spectrum.03441-23.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f53/11218442/cd578d1e2235/spectrum.03441-23.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f53/11218442/407b13b23432/spectrum.03441-23.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f53/11218442/79374ea276ec/spectrum.03441-23.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f53/11218442/496eb5e6a468/spectrum.03441-23.f004.jpg

相似文献

1
The nasal microbiota is a potential diagnostic biomarker for sepsis in critical care units.鼻腔微生物群是重症监护病房脓毒症的潜在诊断生物标志物。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):e0344123. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03441-23. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
2
Septic patients in the intensive care unit present different nasal microbiotas.重症监护室的脓毒症患者具有不同的鼻腔微生物组。
Future Microbiol. 2019 Mar;14(5):383-395. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2018-0349. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
3
Classification of the Gut Microbiota of Patients in Intensive Care Units During Development of Sepsis and Septic Shock.重症监护病房发生脓毒症和感染性休克患者的肠道微生物群分类。
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2020 Dec;18(6):696-707. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2020.06.011. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
4
Gut microbiota profiles in critically ill patients, potential biomarkers and risk variables for sepsis.危重症患者的肠道微生物群特征、脓毒症的潜在生物标志物和风险变量。
Gut Microbes. 2020 Nov 9;12(1):1707610. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2019.1707610. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
5
Temporal instability of the post-surgical maxillary sinus microbiota.上颌窦术后微生物组的时变不稳定性。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 30;18(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3272-9.
6
Analysis of the dynamic changes in gut microbiota in patients with different severity in sepsis.分析不同严重程度脓毒症患者肠道微生物菌群的动态变化。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08608-y.
7
Critically ill patients demonstrate large interpersonal variation in intestinal microbiota dysregulation: a pilot study.危重症患者肠道微生物群失调存在较大个体差异:一项初步研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jan;43(1):59-68. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4613-z. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
8
Fecal Microbiota Signatures Are Associated with Response to Ustekinumab Therapy among Crohn's Disease Patients.粪便微生物群特征与克罗恩病患者对乌司奴单抗治疗的反应相关。
mBio. 2018 Mar 13;9(2):e02120-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02120-17.
9
GLOBAL SIGNATURES OF THE MICROBIOME AND METABOLOME DURING HOSPITALIZATION OF SEPTIC PATIENTS.脓毒症患者住院期间的微生物组和代谢组的全局特征。
Shock. 2023 May 1;59(5):716-724. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002117. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
10
Comparative gut microbiota and resistome profiling of intensive care patients receiving selective digestive tract decontamination and healthy subjects.重症监护患者接受选择性消化道去污染与健康受试者的肠道微生物群和耐药组比较分析。
Microbiome. 2017 Aug 14;5(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0309-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Bacteria and Allergic Diseases.细菌与过敏性疾病
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Sep 25;25(19):10298. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910298.

本文引用的文献

1
Burden of infectious diseases and bacterial antimicrobial resistance in China: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019.中国传染病负担与细菌耐药性:2019年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Nov 22;43:100972. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100972. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Compared to histamine-2 receptor antagonist, proton pump inhibitor induces stronger oral-to-gut microbial transmission and gut microbiome alterations: a randomised controlled trial.与组胺-2 受体拮抗剂相比,质子泵抑制剂可引起更强的口腔到肠道微生物传播和肠道微生物组改变:一项随机对照试验。
Gut. 2024 Jun 6;73(7):1087-1097. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330168.
3
Altered intestinal microbiome and metabolome correspond to the clinical outcome of sepsis.
肠道微生物组和代谢组的改变与脓毒症的临床转归相关。
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 28;27(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04412-x.
4
Passing the SNF Test: A Secondary Analysis of a Sepsis Transition Intervention Trial Among Patients Discharged to Post-Acute Care.通过SNF测试:对转入急性后期护理的脓毒症患者进行的过渡干预试验的二次分析
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 May;24(5):742-746.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
5
Remote ischemic conditioning in septic shock: the RECO-Sepsis randomized clinical trial.远程缺血预处理在感染性休克中的应用:RECO-Sepsis 随机临床试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Nov;48(11):1563-1572. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06872-1. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
6
Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Lactobacilli in Sepsis Patients with Long-Term Antibiotic Therapy.抗生素治疗的脓毒症患者中耐药乳酸菌的流行率。
Curr Microbiol. 2022 Sep 10;79(10):318. doi: 10.1007/s00284-022-03010-4.
7
Pulmonary Microbial Composition in Sepsis-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.脓毒症诱导的急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的肺部微生物组成
Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Jun 23;9:862570. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.862570. eCollection 2022.
8
Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis.2019 年全球细菌对抗菌药物耐药性的负担:系统分析。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):629-655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
9
Epidemiology and Mortality of Sepsis in Intensive Care Units in Prefecture-Level Cities in Sichuan, China: A Prospective Multicenter Study.中国四川省地级市 ICU 中脓毒症的流行病学和死亡率:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Sep 10;27:e932227. doi: 10.12659/MSM.932227.
10
A pilot study of prehospital antibiotics for severe sepsis.院前使用抗生素治疗严重脓毒症的一项初步研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;29(2):231-233. doi: 10.1111/acem.14388. Epub 2021 Sep 28.