Núñez-Ramos José Atilio, Duarte-Misol Dagoberto, Petro María Andrea Burgos, Pérez Keren Jemima Sarmiento, Echeverry Vanessa Paola Gutiérrez, Malagón Sergio Velasco
Health Science Division, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Emergency Department, Hospital Universidad del Norte, Soledad, Colombia.
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;19(6):1585-1592. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03639-y. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an important tool for clinical diagnosis and decision-making in critical and non-critical scenarios. Dyspnea, chest pain, and shock are conditions susceptible to evaluation with ultrasound considering diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact already proven. There is scarce evidence in diagnosis agreement using ultrasound as an extension of physical examination. We aimed to evaluate ED patients in whom POCUS was performed, to analyze agreement between clinical initial diagnosis using ultrasound images and final diagnosis. Furthermore, we analyze failed diagnosis, inconclusive POCUS exams, and discuss details. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on adults who visited the emergency department with any of these three chief complaints: dyspnea, chest pain, and shock. All were evaluated with ultrasound at admission. Agreement between initial diagnosis using POCUS and final definite diagnosis was calculated. Failed diagnosis and inconclusive exams were analyzed. A total of 209 patients were analyzed. Populations: mostly males, mean age 64 years old, hypertensive. Agreement on patients with dyspnea and suspicion of acute decompensated heart failure was 0.98; agreement on chest pain suspicion of non-ST acute coronary syndrome was 0.96; agreement on type of shock was 0.90. Among the population, 12 patients had an inconclusive POCUS exam, and 16 patients had a failed diagnosis. The use of POCUS in the emergency department shows almost perfect agreement when compared with the final diagnosis in individuals experiencing acutely decompensated heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, and shock. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this tool on mortality and prognosis when there are diagnostic errors.
床旁超声(POCUS)是在危急和非危急情况下进行临床诊断和决策的重要工具。考虑到已证实的诊断准确性和临床影响,呼吸困难、胸痛和休克是适合用超声进行评估的病症。关于将超声作为体格检查的延伸用于诊断的一致性证据很少。我们旨在评估接受POCUS检查的急诊患者,分析使用超声图像的临床初步诊断与最终诊断之间的一致性。此外,我们分析诊断失败、POCUS检查结果不确定的情况,并讨论相关细节。对因呼吸困难、胸痛和休克这三种主要症状之一前往急诊科就诊的成年人进行了一项横断面分析研究。所有患者入院时均接受了超声检查。计算了使用POCUS的初步诊断与最终明确诊断之间的一致性。分析了诊断失败和检查结果不确定的情况。共分析了209例患者。人群特征:以男性为主,平均年龄64岁,患有高血压。对怀疑急性失代偿性心力衰竭的呼吸困难患者的诊断一致性为0.98;对怀疑非ST段急性冠状动脉综合征的胸痛患者的诊断一致性为0.96;对休克类型的诊断一致性为0.90。在该人群中,12例患者的POCUS检查结果不确定,16例患者诊断失败。在急诊科使用POCUS与急性失代偿性心力衰竭、急性冠状动脉综合征和休克患者的最终诊断相比,显示出几乎完美的一致性。当存在诊断错误时,需要进行前瞻性研究来评估该工具对死亡率和预后的影响。