Suppr超能文献

北欧国家肢端肥大症的管理:德尔菲共识调查。

Acromegaly management in the Nordic countries: A Delphi consensus survey.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2024 Sep;101(3):263-273. doi: 10.1111/cen.15095. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is associated with increased morbidity and mortality if left untreated. The therapeutic options include surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy. Several guidelines and recommendations on treatment algorithms and follow-up exist. However, not all recommendations are strictly evidence-based. To evaluate consensus on the treatment and follow-up of patients with acromegaly in the Nordic countries.

METHODS

A Delphi process was used to map the landscape of acromegaly management in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Iceland. An expert panel developed 37 statements on the treatment and follow-up of patients with acromegaly. Dedicated endocrinologists (n = 47) from the Nordic countries were invited to rate their extent of agreement with the statements, using a Likert-type scale (1-7). Consensus was defined as ≥80% of panelists rating their agreement as ≥5 or ≤3 on the Likert-type scale.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached in 41% (15/37) of the statements. Panelists agreed that pituitary surgery remains first line treatment. There was general agreement to recommend first-generation somatostatin analog (SSA) treatment after failed surgery and to consider repeat surgery. In addition, there was agreement to recommend combination therapy with first-generation SSA and pegvisomant as second- or third-line treatment. In more than 50% of the statements, consensus was not achieved. Considerable disagreement existed regarding pegvisomant monotherapy, and treatment with pasireotide and dopamine agonists.

CONCLUSION

This consensus exploration study on the management of patients with acromegaly in the Nordic countries revealed a relatively large degree of disagreement among experts, which mirrors the complexity of the disease and the shortage of evidence-based data.

摘要

目的

如果不进行治疗,肢端肥大症会增加发病率和死亡率。治疗选择包括手术、药物治疗和放射治疗。存在关于治疗算法和随访的几项指南和建议。然而,并非所有建议都是严格基于证据的。评估北欧国家肢端肥大症患者治疗和随访的共识。

方法

使用 Delphi 流程来绘制丹麦、瑞典、挪威、芬兰和冰岛肢端肥大症管理的景观。一个专家小组就肢端肥大症患者的治疗和随访制定了 37 项声明。来自北欧国家的专门内分泌学家(n=47)被邀请使用李克特量表(1-7)对这些声明的同意程度进行评分。共识定义为≥80%的小组成员对李克特量表的同意程度为≥5 或≤3。

结果

在 37 项声明中的 41%(15/37)达成了共识。专家组一致认为,垂体手术仍然是一线治疗方法。在手术失败后建议使用第一代生长抑素类似物(SSA)治疗,并考虑再次手术,这得到了普遍认可。此外,还一致建议将第一代 SSA 与培维索孟联合治疗作为二线或三线治疗。在超过 50%的声明中,未达成共识。对培维索孟单药治疗以及帕瑞肽和多巴胺激动剂的治疗存在相当大的分歧。

结论

这项针对北欧国家肢端肥大症患者管理的共识探索研究表明,专家之间存在相当大的分歧,这反映了该疾病的复杂性和缺乏基于证据的数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验