Suppr超能文献

坦桑尼亚农村地区夫妻双方在花钱方面“共同”决策感知的性别差异。

Gender differences in perceptions of "joint" decision-making about spending money among couples in rural Tanzania.

机构信息

Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.

IMA World Health, Mwanza, Tanzania.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 12;19(6):e0302071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302071. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Family and cultural contexts can constrain the effectiveness of evidence-based interventions designed to improve the health and wellbeing of women and their children. Unequal power relationships within the household may underlie the failure of many programs targeting women to achieve their intended impact. To reduce these unequal power dynamics within the households, many programs or interventions aim to both assess and improve the gender dynamics between husbands and wives within the household. Decision-making is one important facet of these dynamics and has been linked to health outcomes for women and children. However, household decision-making is rarely observed and often difficult to capture. This study aimed to use qualitative research to further understand one aspect of decision-making, namely on how to spend money. In two regions of Tanzania, we used surveys and interviews to explore different perspectives on spending and allocation of resources among 58 couples in rural farming households. While many men and women initially reported that they made decisions jointly, most women stated they would often concede if there was a disagreement or argument around spending. These results highlight the different perceptions of joint decision-making between men and women. We compared these results to survey responses on decision-making and found differences within and between couples across interview and survey responses. Based on the differences in qualitative and survey responses within couples and how they reported dealing with disagreement, our study found households were on a spectrum from no cooperation in decision-making to full cooperation. Our results highlight challenges for assessing decision-making on spending and ultimately improving these decision-making dynamics within the household. These challenges are especially important for maternal and child behavioral change and provide insights on why many interventions aimed at improving women's decision- making power on money may not reach their full potential.

摘要

家庭和文化背景会限制旨在改善妇女及其子女健康和福祉的循证干预措施的效果。家庭内部权力不平等可能是许多针对妇女的项目未能实现预期影响的原因。为了减少家庭内部的这种不平等权力动态,许多项目或干预措施旨在评估和改善家庭内部夫妻之间的性别动态。决策是这些动态的一个重要方面,并且与妇女和儿童的健康结果有关。然而,家庭决策很少被观察到,而且往往难以捕捉。本研究旨在使用定性研究进一步了解决策的一个方面,即如何花钱。在坦桑尼亚的两个地区,我们使用调查和访谈来探索农村农业家庭中的 58 对夫妇在支出和资源分配方面的不同观点。虽然许多男性和女性最初报告说他们共同做出决定,但大多数女性表示,如果在支出方面存在分歧或争论,她们通常会让步。这些结果突出了男性和女性对共同决策的不同看法。我们将这些结果与关于决策的调查答复进行了比较,并发现了访谈和调查答复中夫妇之间的差异。基于夫妇内部定性和调查答复之间的差异以及他们报告如何处理分歧的方式,我们的研究发现,家庭在决策方面存在从没有合作到完全合作的不同程度。我们的研究结果强调了评估支出决策的挑战,并最终改善家庭内部的这些决策动态。这些挑战对于评估母婴行为改变特别重要,并提供了一些见解,说明为什么许多旨在提高妇女在金钱方面的决策权的干预措施可能无法发挥其全部潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73c/11168642/5ee0c57483b4/pone.0302071.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验