Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep;50(9):108469. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108469. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and surgical outcomes of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and three remote-access approaches, namely the robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA-R), endoscopic breast-chest approach (BCA-E), and robotic gasless transaxillary approach (GTAA-R) in lateral neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma, compared with conventional transcervical approach (CTA).
The literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, covering the period January 2000 to February 2024. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed to compare surgical feasibility, safety, and oncologic outcomes between approaches.
Fourteen articles on lateral neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma were included after systematic screening. The number of removed and metastatic lateral lymph nodes, the extent of lateral neck dissection, the rate of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and hypoparathyroidism, serum-stimulated thyroglobulin levels, and recurrence were not significantly different between the MIVAT and three remote-access approaches. Additionally, these were comparable to those of the CTA. However, the MIVAT and remote-access approaches took a longer operative time but provided superior cosmetic outcomes compared to the CTA.
Lateral neck dissection using the MIVAT and three remote-access approaches was feasible and comparable to CTA in the number of lymph nodes removed, complications, stimulated thyroglobulin level, and recurrence. The MIVAT and remote-access approaches lasted longer but provided significantly superior cosmetic outcomes compared to the CTA.
本研究旨在评估微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT)与三种远程入路(机器人双侧腋窝-乳房入路[BABA-R]、内镜乳房-胸部入路[BCA-E]和机器人无气经腋窝入路[GTAA-R])在甲状腺乳头状癌侧颈部清扫中的可行性和手术结果,并与传统经颈入路(CTA)进行比较。
对 2000 年 1 月至 2024 年 2 月的 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库进行文献检索,采用系统评价和网络荟萃分析比较各种方法的手术可行性、安全性和肿瘤学结果。
经过系统筛选,共纳入 14 项关于甲状腺乳头状癌侧颈部清扫的研究。MIVAT 与三种远程入路在侧颈部清扫中切除和转移性侧颈淋巴结的数量、侧颈部清扫的范围、暂时性喉返神经麻痹和甲状旁腺功能减退的发生率、血清刺激甲状腺球蛋白水平以及复发率方面均无显著差异,且与 CTA 相当。然而,MIVAT 和远程入路的手术时间较长,但与 CTA 相比,美容效果更好。
MIVAT 和三种远程入路行侧颈部清扫术在淋巴结清扫数量、并发症、刺激甲状腺球蛋白水平和复发方面与 CTA 一样可行。MIVAT 和远程入路的手术时间较长,但与 CTA 相比,美容效果显著更好。