Wang Junyi, Zhang Yan, Zheng Xiangqian, Tae Kyung
Department of Thyroid and Neck Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gland Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(3):543-562. doi: 10.21037/gs-2024-535. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
Remote-access endoscopic and robotic thyroid surgery has progressively evolved over the decades to minimize visible neck scarring. Various approaches, including axillary, anterior chest, breast, postauricular, and transoral routes, have been developed, extending their application to lateral neck dissection (LND) in thyroid cancer. This study aims to comprehensively review and synthesize recent literature on remote-access endoscopic and robotic techniques for LND, with a focus on outcomes, advantages, and limitations.
A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. Search terms included "lateral neck dissection", "thyroid cancer", "remote-access", "robotic", "endoscopic", and "video-assisted". Eligible studies were analyzed to provide an in-depth overview of current techniques, addressing the following aspects: (I) incision location; (II) surgical procedures; (III) complications and surgical outcomes; and (IV) advantages and limitations of each approach.
Various remote-access techniques for LND were identified, including gasless infraclavicular, breast-chest, gasless transaxillary, bilateral axillo-breast, gasless retroauricular, transoral, and combined approaches. Outcomes, including the number of removed lateral lymph nodes, complication rates, and recurrence rates, were comparable across remote-access approaches. The extent of dissection achieved with these techniques was equivalent to conventional approaches for levels IIa, III, IV, and V, except for the transoral approach, which was generally limited to levels III and IV. Postoperative cosmetic outcomes were significantly superior with remote-access techniques.
Remote-access approaches for thyroidectomy combined with LND are both feasible and safe, achieving complete resection of targeted neck levels with excellent surgical and cosmetic outcomes. The unique advantages and limitations of each method underscore the importance of careful patient selection to optimize clinical benefits.
在过去几十年中,远程接入式内镜和机器人甲状腺手术不断发展,以尽量减少颈部可见瘢痕。已开发出多种入路,包括腋窝、前胸、乳房、耳后和经口途径,并将其应用扩展到甲状腺癌的侧颈淋巴结清扫术(LND)。本研究旨在全面回顾和综合近期关于远程接入式内镜和机器人技术用于LND的文献,重点关注手术结果、优势和局限性。
使用PubMed和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行系统的文献综述。检索词包括“侧颈淋巴结清扫术”“甲状腺癌”“远程接入”“机器人”“内镜”和“视频辅助”。对符合条件的研究进行分析,以深入概述当前技术,涉及以下方面:(I)切口位置;(II)手术步骤;(III)并发症和手术结果;以及(IV)每种入路的优势和局限性。
确定了多种用于LND的远程接入技术,包括无气锁骨下、乳房 - 胸部、无气经腋窝、双侧腋窝 - 乳房、无气耳后、经口和联合入路。各种远程接入入路在切除的侧方淋巴结数量、并发症发生率和复发率等手术结果方面相当。除经口入路通常限于III级和IV级外,这些技术实现的清扫范围与IIa、III、IV和V级的传统入路相当。远程接入技术的术后美容效果明显更佳。
甲状腺切除术联合LND的远程接入入路既可行又安全,能够完全切除目标颈部水平的组织,手术和美容效果极佳。每种方法独特的优势和局限性凸显了仔细选择患者以优化临床益处的重要性。