Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center for Dentistry and Oral Health (Carolinum), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Department of Orthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Health (Carolinum), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Oct;26(5):913-921. doi: 10.1111/cid.13351. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
The determination of the maxillary occlusal plane presents a significant clinical challenge in the treatment of edentulous patients as well as it is critical for complex full-mouth reconstructions in dentate patients, including those with implant-supported rehabilitations. While the use of a Fox plane plate is standard in edentulous cases, its application in dentate patients lacks thorough documentation in existing literature.
This clinical study assessed the sagittal position of the maxillary dentition in relation to facial landmarks using a digital three-dimensional analysis and evaluated the suitability and reliability of applying a simulated Fox plane plate, also known as an occlusal plane guide, in dentate patients.
Eighty-one subjects were recruited at the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany, according to specific inclusion criteria. Intraoral and facial scans were obtained and analyzed using GOM Inspect Pro software (GOM, Braunschweig, Germany). The angles between the maxillary occlusal plane and three variations each of Camper's plane and ala-tragus line, relating to superior, middle, and inferior tragus points, were measured. These modified planes were then compared to a plane established by a simulated digital Fox plane plate, which was adapted to the maxillary anterior teeth and the lowest point of the posterior teeth in both quadrants.
A total of 81 subjects (58 female and 23 male) with a mean age of 23.9 years were evaluated in this study. No significant angular difference was found between the angles of the maxillary occlusal plane compared with superior Camper's plane, middle Camper's plane, or superior ala-tragus line (p >0.05). The smallest angle occurred between superior Camper's plane and the maxillary occlusal plane on both the right (3.443°) and left (3.535°) sides. The application of a Fox plane plate resulted in two different occlusal planes in 70% of patients, significantly deviating from the digitally determined plane (p <0.05).
Superior and middle Camper's planes, along with superior ala-tragus line, can be considered approximately parallel reference planes and are suitable for routine determining of the maxillary occlusal plane in restorative treatments. However, in contrast to digital evaluation methods, the application of a Fox plane plate in dentate patients showed high variability, indicating its low reproducibility due to its ambiguous positioning on the maxillary dentition. Clinical trial registration site: https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00030166.
在上颌无牙患者的治疗中,确定上颌咬合平面具有重要的临床意义,对于有牙患者的复杂全口重建也至关重要,包括那些接受种植体支持修复的患者。虽然在无牙病例中使用 Fox 平面板是标准的,但在有牙患者中,其应用在现有文献中缺乏详细记录。
本临床研究使用数字三维分析评估上颌牙列相对于面部标志的矢状位置,并评估在有牙患者中应用模拟 Fox 平面板(也称为咬合平面引导器)的适用性和可靠性。
根据特定的纳入标准,在德国法兰克福歌德大学修复牙科系招募了 81 名受试者。获取并使用 GOM Inspect Pro 软件(GOM,德国不伦瑞克)对口腔内和面部扫描进行分析。测量上颌咬合平面与 Camper 平面和耳屏-鼻翼线的每个变化之间的角度,涉及上、中、下耳屏点。然后将这些修改后的平面与通过模拟数字 Fox 平面板建立的平面进行比较,该平面适应上颌前牙和两个象限中后牙的最低点。
本研究共评估了 81 名受试者(58 名女性和 23 名男性),平均年龄为 23.9 岁。上颌咬合平面与上 Camper 平面、中 Camper 平面或上耳屏-鼻翼线的角度之间没有发现显著的角度差异(p>0.05)。右侧(3.443°)和左侧(3.535°)上颌咬合平面与上 Camper 平面之间的最小角度。在 70%的患者中,应用 Fox 平面板导致两个不同的咬合平面,与数字确定的平面显著偏离(p<0.05)。
上 Camper 平面、中 Camper 平面和上耳屏-鼻翼线可以被认为是近似平行的参考平面,适用于修复治疗中常规确定上颌咬合平面。然而,与数字评估方法相比,在有牙患者中应用 Fox 平面板显示出高度的可变性,表明其由于在上颌牙列上的定位不明确而具有低重现性。临床试验注册网站:https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00030166。