Soong Jie Lin, Ho Pei Lin, Neo Valerie Ser Hwee, Lie Sui An
Division of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jan;30(1):19-26. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13092. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
Healthcare's carbon footprint contributes to 4.4% of global net emissions and intensive care units (ICUs) are very resource intensive. Existing studies on environmental sustainability in ICUs focused on carbon footprint generated from energy and electricity consumption, use of medical consumables and equipment, but few studies quantified carbon footprint generated from pharmaceuticals used in ICUs.
To evaluate carbon footprint arising from sedation practices in the ICUs.
A pilot, prospective observational study was conducted in two ICUs from 1 August to 22 September 2022 in Singapore General Hospital. Adult patients who were consecutively sedated, intubated and expected to be mechanically ventilated for at least 24 h were included. Total amount of analgesia and sedatives used and wasted in eligible patients were collected. Carbon emission from ICU sedation practices were then quantified using available life cycle assessment data.
A total of 31 patients were recruited. Top analgesia and sedative used in both ICUs were fentanyl and propofol, respectively. Carbon footprint from sedative usage and wastage across 7 weeks in both ICUs were 2.206 kg CO-e and 0.286 g CO-e, respectively. In total, this equates to driving 15.8 km by car. Proportion of drug wasted ranged from 5.1% to 25.0%, with the top reason for wastage being the drug was no longer clinically indicated. Recommendations to reduce carbon footprint include choosing sedatives with lower carbon emissions where possible and having effective communication among doctors and nurses regarding management plans to minimize unnecessary wastage.
Our study quantified carbon footprint arising from sedation practices, mainly drug usage and wastage in two ICUs in Singpore General Hospital.
Adopting a holistic approach to environmental sustainability in the ICU, sedation practices also contribute to generating greenhouse gases, albeit small, and can be targeted to reduce unnecessary carbon footprint.
医疗保健行业的碳足迹占全球净排放量的4.4%,重症监护病房(ICU)资源消耗极大。现有关于ICU环境可持续性的研究主要集中在能源和电力消耗、医疗耗材及设备使用所产生的碳足迹,但很少有研究对ICU使用的药品所产生的碳足迹进行量化。
评估ICU镇静治疗所产生的碳足迹。
2022年8月1日至9月22日,在新加坡总医院的两个ICU进行了一项前瞻性试点观察研究。纳入连续接受镇静、插管且预计机械通气至少24小时的成年患者。收集符合条件患者使用和浪费的镇痛和镇静药物总量。然后利用现有的生命周期评估数据对ICU镇静治疗的碳排放进行量化。
共招募31例患者。两个ICU中使用最多的镇痛和镇静药物分别是芬太尼和丙泊酚。两个ICU在7周内镇静药物使用和浪费产生的碳足迹分别为2.206千克二氧化碳当量和0.286克二氧化碳当量。总计相当于驾车行驶15.8公里。药物浪费比例在5.1%至25.0%之间,浪费的主要原因是药物不再具有临床指征。减少碳足迹的建议包括尽可能选择碳排放量较低的镇静药物,以及医生和护士就管理计划进行有效沟通,以尽量减少不必要的浪费。
我们的研究量化了新加坡总医院两个ICU镇静治疗所产生的碳足迹,主要是药物使用和浪费。
在ICU采取整体环境可持续性方法时,镇静治疗也会产生温室气体,尽管量小,但可针对性地减少不必要的碳足迹。