Walsh Timothy S, Kydonaki Kalliopi, Antonelli Jean, Stephen Jacqueline, Lee Robert J, Everingham Kirsty, Hanley Janet, Uutelo Kimmo, Peltola Petra, Weir Christopher J
Anaesthetics, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 4;6(3):e010148. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010148.
To describe the rationale, design and methodology for a trial of three novel interventions developed to improve sedation-analgesia quality in adult intensive care units (ICUs).
8 clusters, each a Scottish ICU. All mechanically ventilated sedated patients were potentially eligible for inclusion in data analysis.
Cluster randomised design in 8 ICUs, with ICUs randomised after 45 weeks baseline data collection to implement one of four intervention combinations: a web-based educational programme (2 ICUs); education plus regular sedation quality feedback using process control charts (2 ICUs); education plus a novel sedation monitoring technology (2 ICUs); or all three interventions. ICUs measured sedation-analgesia quality, relevant drug use and clinical outcomes, during a 45-week preintervention and 45-week postintervention period separated by an 8-week implementation period. The intended sample size was >100 patients per site per study period.
The primary outcome was the proportion of 12 h care periods with optimum sedation-analgesia, defined as the absence of agitation, unnecessary deep sedation, poor relaxation and poor ventilator synchronisation. Secondary outcomes were proportions of care periods with each of these four components of optimum sedation and rates of sedation-related adverse events. Sedative and analgesic drug use, and ICU and hospital outcomes were also measured.
Multilevel generalised linear regression mixed models will explore the effects of each intervention taking clustering into account, and adjusting for age, gender and APACHE II score. Sedation-analgesia quality outcomes will be explored at ICU level and individual patient level. A process evaluation using mixed methods including quantitative description of intervention implementation, focus groups and direct observation will provide explanatory information regarding any effects observed.
The DESIST study uses a novel design to provide system-level evaluation of three contrasting complex interventions on sedation-analgesia quality. Recruitment is complete and analysis ongoing.
NCT01634451.
描述一项针对三种旨在改善成人重症监护病房(ICU)镇静镇痛质量的新型干预措施的试验的基本原理、设计和方法。
8个群组,每个群组为一家苏格兰ICU。所有接受机械通气的镇静患者均有可能纳入数据分析。
在8个ICU中采用群组随机设计,在收集45周基线数据后,将ICU随机分配以实施四种干预组合之一:基于网络的教育计划(2个ICU);教育加使用过程控制图的定期镇静质量反馈(2个ICU);教育加一种新型镇静监测技术(2个ICU);或所有三种干预措施。ICU在为期45周的干预前和为期45周的干预后期间(中间间隔8周的实施期)测量镇静镇痛质量、相关药物使用情况和临床结局。每个研究期间每个地点的预期样本量为>100名患者。
主要结局是12小时护理期间达到最佳镇静镇痛的比例,最佳镇静镇痛定义为无躁动、无不必要的深度镇静、良好的松弛状态和良好的呼吸机同步性。次要结局是护理期间达到最佳镇静这四个组成部分中每一部分的比例以及镇静相关不良事件的发生率。还测量了镇静和镇痛药物的使用情况以及ICU和医院的结局。
多水平广义线性回归混合模型将考虑聚类因素,并对年龄、性别和急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分进行调整,以探讨每种干预措施的效果。将在ICU层面和个体患者层面探讨镇静镇痛质量结局。使用包括干预实施定量描述、焦点小组和直接观察在内的混合方法进行过程评估,将提供有关所观察到的任何效果的解释性信息。
“DESIST研究”采用了一种新颖的设计,对三种不同的复杂干预措施对镇静镇痛质量进行系统层面的评估。招募工作已完成,分析正在进行中。
NCT01634451。