• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 SEER 数据库的近端胃癌近端胃切除术的长期结果:倾向评分匹配分析。

The Long-Term Results of Proximal Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Based on SEER Database.

机构信息

Chongqing University FuLing Hospital, Chongqing, China.

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2024 Nov;90(11):3015-3023. doi: 10.1177/00031348241260273. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1177/00031348241260273
PMID:38867409
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of function-preserving gastrectomy (FPG). In this study, we compared the long-term results of proximal gastric cancer (PGC) patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy (TG).

METHOD

Patients diagnosed with PGC and receiving PG or TG between 2004 and 2020 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize confounding factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the PG and TG groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors affecting OS.

RESULT

A total of 3916 patients were recruited according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 2614 undergoing PG and 1302 undergoing TG. After 1:1 PSM matching, 912 pairs of data were included for analysis. Before PSM matching, PG group tended to have better OS and CSS outcomes. However, after PSM matching, both surgical approaches showed similar long-term results.

CONCLUSION

PG for PGC yields comparable long-term outcomes to TG and demonstrates safety in terms of oncologic outcomes.

摘要

背景

近端胃切除术(PG)是一种保留功能的胃切除术(FPG)。本研究比较了接受近端胃切除术和全胃切除术(TG)的近端胃癌(PGC)患者的长期结果。

方法

从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中选择 2004 年至 2020 年间诊断为 PGC 并接受 PG 或 TG 的患者。应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)以最小化混杂因素。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析和对数秩检验比较 PG 组和 TG 组的总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。采用单因素和多因素 Cox 回归分析确定影响 OS 的独立危险因素。

结果

根据纳入和排除标准共招募了 3916 例患者,其中 2614 例行 PG,1302 例行 TG。经过 1:1 PSM 匹配后,纳入 912 对数据进行分析。在 PSM 匹配前,PG 组的 OS 和 CSS 结果较好。但在 PSM 匹配后,两种手术方式的长期结果相似。

结论

PG 治疗 PGC 的长期疗效与 TG 相当,在肿瘤学结果方面具有安全性。

相似文献

1
The Long-Term Results of Proximal Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Based on SEER Database.基于 SEER 数据库的近端胃癌近端胃切除术的长期结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Am Surg. 2024 Nov;90(11):3015-3023. doi: 10.1177/00031348241260273. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
2
Proximal Gastrectomy versus Total Gastrectomy for Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Comprehensive Analysis of Data from the SEER Registry.近端胃切除术与全胃切除术治疗食管胃结合部 Siewert II 型腺癌:来自 SEER 登记处的数据综合分析。
Dis Markers. 2019 Dec 31;2019:9637972. doi: 10.1155/2019/9637972. eCollection 2019.
3
Total vs proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicenter western experience (On behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer-GIRCG).全胃切除术与近端胃切除术治疗胃上部腺癌:多中心西方经验的倾向评分匹配分析(代表意大利胃癌研究组-GIRCG)。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Sep;21(5):845-852. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0804-3. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
Palliative Gastrectomy and Survival in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Population-Based Study.姑息性胃切除术与转移性胃癌患者的生存:一项基于大人群的倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2019 May 22;10(5):1-8. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000048.
5
Outcomes of Proximal Versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Western Center Experience.近端胃癌行近端胃切除术与全胃切除术的疗效比较:西方中心经验的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Aug;27(8):1560-1567. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05686-w. Epub 2023 May 2.
6
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic therapy versus surgical resection for 2-5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A population-based comparative study.内镜治疗与手术切除 2-5cm 胃胃肠间质瘤的长期疗效比较:一项基于人群的对照研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;50(6):108262. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108262. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
7
Proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database analysis.近端胃切除术与全胃切除术治疗近端胃癌:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果计划数据库分析。
Future Oncol. 2021 Apr;17(10):1185-1195. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1071. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
8
The value of spleen-preserving lymphadenectomy in total gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinomas: A long-term retrospective propensity score match study from a high-volume institution in China.保留脾脏的淋巴结清扫术在全胃切除治疗胃及胃食管结合部腺癌中的价值:来自中国一家大容量医疗机构的长期回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
Surgery. 2021 Feb;169(2):426-435. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.07.053. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
9
The effects of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy on the surgical outcome of proximal gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched, case-control study.腹腔镜保留脾脏的脾门淋巴结清扫术对近端胃癌手术结局的影响:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1383-1392. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5126-0. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
10
Clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.局部进展期近端胃癌行近端胃切除术与全胃切除术的临床结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Apr;9(4):2769-2779. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.02.38.