MacPhail Aleece, Dendle Claire, Slavin Monica, Weinkove Robert, Bailey Michael, Pilcher David, McQuilten Zoe
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 May 19;11(6):ofae289. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae289. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Neutropenic sepsis frequently requires admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Differences between subgroups of patients with neutropenic sepsis are not well characterized.
To investigate clinical outcomes among patients with neutropenic sepsis and hematological malignancy, metastatic solid cancer, or no cancer diagnosis.
Retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to ICU in Australia or New Zealand between January 2000 and December 2022 with a primary admission diagnosis of sepsis and total white cell count <1.0 × 10 cells/L.
We identified 8617 ICU admissions with neutropenic sepsis (hematological malignancy n = 4660; metastatic solid cancer n = 1034; no cancer n = 2800). Patients with hematological malignancy were younger (median, 61.5 years) with low rates of chronic comorbidities (4.7%) and were usually admitted to ICU from the ward (67.4%). Mechanical ventilation rates were 20.2% and in-hospital mortality was 30.6%. Patients with metastatic solid cancers were older (median, 66.3 years), with higher rates of chronic comorbidities (9.9%), and were usually admitted to the ICU from the emergency department (50.8%). Mechanical ventilation rates were 16.9% and in-hospital mortality was 42.4%. Patients with no documented cancer had highest rates of mechanical ventilation (41.7%) and mortality (46.3%). Neutropenia was independently associated with mortality among patients with solid cancers or no cancer but did not confer increased risk among patients with hematological malignancy (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, .90-1.06; = .60).
Patients with neutropenic sepsis and hematological malignancy, metastatic solid cancer, or no cancer diagnosis constitute 3 distinct clinical groups. Management approaches should be tailored accordingly.
中性粒细胞减少性脓毒症患者常需入住重症监护病房(ICU)。中性粒细胞减少性脓毒症患者亚组之间的差异尚未得到充分描述。
研究中性粒细胞减少性脓毒症合并血液系统恶性肿瘤、转移性实体癌或无癌症诊断患者的临床结局。
对2000年1月至2022年12月期间在澳大利亚或新西兰入住ICU且初次入院诊断为脓毒症且白细胞总数<1.0×10⁹/L的所有患者进行回顾性队列研究。
我们确定了8617例因中性粒细胞减少性脓毒症入住ICU的患者(血液系统恶性肿瘤患者4660例;转移性实体癌患者1034例;无癌症患者2800例)。血液系统恶性肿瘤患者较年轻(中位年龄61.5岁),慢性合并症发生率较低(4.7%),通常从病房转入ICU(67.4%)。机械通气率为20.2%,院内死亡率为30.6%。转移性实体癌患者年龄较大(中位年龄66.3岁),慢性合并症发生率较高(9.9%),通常从急诊科转入ICU(50.8%)。机械通气率为16.9%,院内死亡率为42.4%。无癌症记录的患者机械通气率(41.7%)和死亡率(46.3%)最高。中性粒细胞减少与实体癌或无癌症患者的死亡率独立相关,但在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中并未增加风险(比值比,0.98;95%置信区间,0.90 - 1.06;P = 0.60)。
中性粒细胞减少性脓毒症合并血液系统恶性肿瘤、转移性实体癌或无癌症诊断的患者构成3个不同的临床组。管理方法应相应调整。