• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产瘢痕处胎盘部位超常:误诊为妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤:一例报告

Exaggerated placental site in a cesarean scar: Misdiagnosed as gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A case report.

作者信息

Chen Zongbin, Wang Minghua, Yang Ping, Yao Bo, Shuai Hanlin, Li Ping

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jinan University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, P.R. China.

Department of Pathology, Jinan University School of Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, P.R. China.

出版信息

Exp Ther Med. 2024 May 23;28(1):298. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12587. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.3892/etm.2024.12587
PMID:38868614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11168028/
Abstract

The present study reports a rare case of an exaggerated placental site (EPS) in a caesarean scar that was misdiagnosed as gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) by imaging, resulting in unnecessary surgical treatment. A 38-year-old woman underwent hysteroscopic resection of a cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). The patient's serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) level was elevated (76,196 mIU/ml) at the 24-day postoperative follow-up visit. On postoperative day 51, the patient experienced vaginal bleeding for three days and β-hCG levels were 2,799 mIU/ml. Ultrasonography and MRI revealed a heterogeneous mass and hypervascularity. The patient was diagnosed with a GTN in a cesarean scar and treated with methotrexate (MTX). β-hCG levels decreased after 3 MTX doses, but the mass did not change in size and was still hypervascular on imaging. Total hysterectomy was performed due to the serious side effects of chemotherapy and the lack of desire to preserve fertility. The histological findings supported the diagnosis of an EPS reaction. The present case is unique because of the rare intrauterine mass and possibility of retained trophoblastic changes causing EPS. EPS differs from GTN both clinically and pathologically and should be considered a possible diagnosis in any woman who has irregular bleeding following CSP resection.

摘要

本研究报告了一例罕见的剖宫产瘢痕处胎盘部位超常反应(EPS)病例,该病例经影像学检查被误诊为妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN),从而导致了不必要的手术治疗。一名38岁女性接受了剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的宫腔镜切除术。术后24天随访时,患者血清β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-hCG)水平升高(76196 mIU/ml)。术后第51天,患者出现阴道出血3天,β-hCG水平为2799 mIU/ml。超声检查和磁共振成像(MRI)显示有一个不均匀肿块且血运丰富。该患者被诊断为剖宫产瘢痕处GTN,并接受了甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗。3次MTX给药后β-hCG水平下降,但肿块大小未改变,影像学检查仍显示血运丰富。由于化疗的严重副作用以及患者无保留生育功能的意愿,遂行全子宫切除术。组织学检查结果支持EPS反应的诊断。本病例独特之处在于子宫内肿块罕见,且存在滋养细胞残留变化导致EPS的可能性。EPS在临床和病理上均与GTN不同,对于任何在CSP切除术后出现不规则出血的女性,都应考虑EPS这一可能的诊断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/540a/11168028/5635b6bfe773/etm-28-01-12587-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/540a/11168028/0a3742e0393b/etm-28-01-12587-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/540a/11168028/43a75541689a/etm-28-01-12587-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/540a/11168028/5635b6bfe773/etm-28-01-12587-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/540a/11168028/0a3742e0393b/etm-28-01-12587-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/540a/11168028/43a75541689a/etm-28-01-12587-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/540a/11168028/5635b6bfe773/etm-28-01-12587-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
Exaggerated placental site in a cesarean scar: Misdiagnosed as gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A case report.剖宫产瘢痕处胎盘部位超常:误诊为妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤:一例报告
Exp Ther Med. 2024 May 23;28(1):298. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12587. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Epithelioid trophoblastic tumor presenting as a Caesarean scar defect: A case report.表现为剖宫产瘢痕缺损的上皮样滋养细胞肿瘤:一例报告。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2021 Jan 30;36:100715. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100715. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Placenta Site Trophoblastic Tumor and Choriocarcinoma from Previous Cesarean Section Scar: Case Reports.既往剖宫产瘢痕处胎盘部位滋养细胞肿瘤及绒毛膜癌:病例报告
Iran J Med Sci. 2018 Jul;43(4):426-431.
4
Case report: Two rare uterine cesarean scar mass cases.病例报告:两例罕见的子宫剖宫产瘢痕部位肿块病例。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Mar 24;102(12):e33015. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033015.
5
Long-term outcome of ultrasound-guided focused ultrasound ablation for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in the cesarean scar: a case report.超声引导聚焦超声消融治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的长期疗效:1 例报告。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Dec 15;22(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02114-0.
6
Identification and treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia located in the cesarean scar.剖宫产术后瘢痕部位妊娠性滋养细胞肿瘤的识别与治疗。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 May;141(2):222-227. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12417. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
7
Efficacy of Oral Vitamin A in Reducing β-hCG Levels in Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Patients.口服维生素 A 在降低低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者β-hCG 水平中的疗效。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Nov 1;21(11):3325-3329. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.11.3325.
8
Conservative cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: local methotrexate injection followed by hysteroscopic removal with hysteroscopic tissue removal system.保守性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗:局部注射甲氨蝶呤后行宫腔镜下妊娠组织清除术。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Nov;116(5):1417-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.034. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
9
[Value of laparoscopic surgery in the diagnosis of suspected gestational trophoblastic neoplasia cases with uterine mass].[腹腔镜手术在诊断子宫肿块疑似妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤病例中的价值]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):910-4.
10
[Clinical study on 39 cases with caesarean scar pregnancy with sonographic mass].[39例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠伴超声肿块的临床研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;49(1):10-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosing and Managing Trophoblastic Lesions in Cesarean Scars: A Systematic Review.剖宫产瘢痕处滋养细胞病变的诊断与管理:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Jun 24;17(6):e86647. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86647. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
A Pathologist's Dilemma: Placental Site Tumor and Its Differential Diagnosis.病理学家的困境:胎盘部位肿瘤及其鉴别诊断
Cureus. 2025 Feb 24;17(2):e79599. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79599. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Sonographic Findings of Vascular Signals for Retained Products of Conception in Women Following First-Trimester Termination of Pregnancy.经超声检查发现,有部分女性在孕早期行人工流产术后仍有妊娠组织残留。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024 Mar;46(3):102266. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102266. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
2
Extravillous trophoblast invasion and decidualization in cesarean scar pregnancies.剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠中绒毛外滋养细胞浸润和蜕膜化。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Oct;101(10):1120-1128. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14435. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
3
Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy masquerading as gestational trophoblastic disease.
剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠误诊为妊娠滋养细胞疾病。
J Postgrad Med. 2022 Jan-Mar;68(1):35-37. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_461_21.
4
Early prediction of post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and resistance to methotrexate, based on a single serum human chorionic gonadotropin measurement.基于单次血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素测量值预测绒癌及耐药。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Dec;163(3):531-537. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.016. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
Pathology of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD).妊娠滋养细胞疾病(GTD)的病理学。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jul;74:3-28. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
6
Epithelioid trophoblastic tumor coexisting with choriocarcinoma around an abdominal wall cesarean scar: a case report and review of the literature.腹壁剖宫产瘢痕周围同时存在上皮样滋养细胞肿瘤与绒毛膜癌:1例报告并文献复习
J Med Case Rep. 2020 Oct 5;14(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13256-020-02485-8.
7
Identifying possible risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy based on a retrospective study of 291 cases.基于对291例病例的回顾性研究确定剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的潜在危险因素。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Feb;46(2):272-278. doi: 10.1111/jog.14163. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
8
Identification and treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia located in the cesarean scar.剖宫产术后瘢痕部位妊娠性滋养细胞肿瘤的识别与治疗。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 May;141(2):222-227. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12417. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
9
Management of persistent caesarean scar pregnancy after curettage treatment failure.刮宫治疗失败后持续性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的管理
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 1;17(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1395-4.
10
Placenta Increta Presenting as Exaggerated Placental Site Reaction.表现为胎盘部位反应过度的胎盘植入
Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2017 Mar-Apr;20(2):152-157. doi: 10.1177/1093526616681939. Epub 2017 Jan 25.