Division of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University.
School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University.
Emotion. 2024 Oct;24(7):1563-1581. doi: 10.1037/emo0001373. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
Cognitive reappraisal refers to the reinterpretation of a situation to alter its emotional meaning. Theoretically, executive functions (EFs), such as inhibition, updating, and shifting, are core elements of reappraisal processes. However, empirical studies have yielded inconsistent evidence as to whether and to what extent EFs are associated with reappraisal. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of the literature in which 179 effect sizes from 59 independent samples ( = 4,703) were included. Using random-effects metaregression with robust-variance estimates and small-sample corrections, we also examined whether variation in effect sizes could be accounted for by potential moderators, such as the way reappraisal was assessed (i.e., questionnaires vs. task-based measures) and the type of stimuli used in EF tasks (i.e., affective vs. nonaffective). Overall, results indicate relatively small to typical associations between reappraisal and all three EFs (s = .13-.19). While the way reappraisal was measured did not moderate any of the relations between EF and reappraisal, we found stronger relations between inhibition and reappraisal when EF was assessed using tasks that involved affective, relative to nonaffective, stimuli. Our meta-analytic findings offer modest support for the idea that EFs are cognitive constituents of reappraisal processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
认知重评是指对情境进行重新解释,以改变其情绪意义。理论上,执行功能(EFs),如抑制、更新和转换,是重评过程的核心要素。然而,实证研究对于 EFs 是否以及在何种程度上与重评相关,得出的证据并不一致。为了解决这个问题,我们对文献进行了荟萃分析,其中包括 59 个独立样本(n = 4703)的 179 个效应量。我们还使用随机效应荟萃回归和稳健方差估计以及小样本校正,检验了潜在的调节因素(例如,重评的评估方式(即问卷与基于任务的测量)和 EF 任务中使用的刺激类型(即情感与非情感))是否可以解释效应量的变化。总体而言,结果表明,重评与所有三种 EF 之间的关联程度相对较小,为中等(s =.13-.19)。虽然重评的评估方式并没有调节 EF 与重评之间的任何关系,但当使用涉及情感而非非情感刺激的任务来评估 EF 时,我们发现抑制与重评之间的关系更强。我们的荟萃分析结果为 EF 是重评过程的认知成分这一观点提供了适度的支持。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。