Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
JAMA. 2024 Jul 9;332(2):124-132. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.8378.
Increasing access to naloxone (an opioid antagonist that can reverse overdose) could slow the US opioid epidemic. Prior studies suggest cost sharing may be a barrier to dispensing of naloxone prescriptions, but these studies were limited by their cross-sectional designs and use of databases that do not capture prescriptions that are not filled (abandoned).
To evaluate the association between cost sharing and naloxone prescription abandonment (nondispensing of naloxone prescriptions).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional, regression discontinuity analysis exploited the fact that deductibles typically reset at the beginning of the year in commercial and Medicare plans. The included data were derived from the 2020-2021 IQVIA Formulary Impact Analyzer (a pharmacy transactions database that represents 63% of prescriptions at US pharmacies). The analysis included claims for naloxone nasal spray among commercially insured patients and Medicare patients that occurred during the 60 days before January 1, 2021, through 59 days after January 1, 2021.
Cost sharing, which is defined as the amount patients would have to pay to fill prescriptions.
Local linear regression models were used to assess for abrupt changes in cost sharing and the probability of prescription abandonment on January 1, 2021. To estimate the association between cost sharing and prescription abandonment, a fuzzy regression discontinuity analysis was conducted.
These analyses included naloxone claims for 71 306 commercially insured patients and 101 706 Medicare patients (40 019 [56.1%] and 61 410 [60.4%], respectively, were female). The commercially insured patients and Medicare patients accounted for 73 311 and 106 076 naloxone claims, respectively. On January 1, 2021, the mean cost sharing per claim increased by $15.0 (95% CI, $13.8-$16.2) for commercially insured patients and increased by $12.3 (95% CI, $10.9-$13.6) for Medicare patients and the probability of abandonment increased by 4.7 (95% CI, 3.2-6.2) percentage points and 2.8 (95% CI, 1.6-4.1) percentage points, respectively. The results from the fuzzy regression discontinuity analysis suggest a decision by commercial and Medicare plans to increase naloxone cost sharing by $10 would be associated with percentage-point increases of 3.1 (95% CI, 2.2-4.1) and 2.3 (95% CI, 1.4-3.2), respectively, in the probability of abandonment.
The elimination of cost sharing might be associated with increased naloxone dispensing to commercially insured and Medicare patients.
增加纳洛酮(一种可以逆转过量的阿片类拮抗剂)的获取渠道可能会减缓美国阿片类药物泛滥的速度。先前的研究表明,费用分担可能是开具纳洛酮处方的障碍,但这些研究受到其横断面设计和使用的数据库的限制,这些数据库无法捕捉未填写的处方(即废弃的处方)。
评估费用分担与纳洛酮处方放弃(未开具纳洛酮处方)之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:本横断面、回归不连续分析利用了商业和医疗保险计划通常在年初重置免赔额的事实。所包括的数据来自 2020-2021 年 IQVIA 处方影响分析器(一个药房交易数据库,代表美国药房 63%的处方)。分析包括在 2021 年 1 月 1 日前的 60 天内和 2021 年 1 月 1 日后的 59 天内,商业保险患者和医疗保险患者的纳洛酮鼻喷雾剂的索赔。
费用分担,定义为患者需要支付的处方费用。
使用局部线性回归模型来评估 2021 年 1 月 1 日费用分担和处方放弃的概率是否突然发生变化。为了估计费用分担与处方放弃之间的关联,进行了模糊回归不连续分析。
这些分析包括 71306 名商业保险患者和 101706 名医疗保险患者的纳洛酮索赔(分别有 40019 名[56.1%]和 61410 名[60.4%]为女性)。商业保险患者和医疗保险患者分别有 73311 份和 106076 份纳洛酮索赔。2021 年 1 月 1 日,商业保险患者的每份索赔的平均费用分担增加了 15.0 美元(95%CI,13.8-16.2),医疗保险患者增加了 12.3 美元(95%CI,10.9-13.6),放弃的概率分别增加了 4.7(95%CI,3.2-6.2)个百分点和 2.8(95%CI,1.6-4.1)个百分点。模糊回归不连续分析的结果表明,商业和医疗保险计划决定将纳洛酮的费用分担增加 10 美元,可能会分别导致放弃的概率增加 3.1(95%CI,2.2-4.1)和 2.3(95%CI,1.4-3.2)。
消除费用分担可能与商业保险和医疗保险患者纳洛酮的配药增加有关。