Fell Matthew, Fitzsimons Kate J, Hamilton Mark J, Medina Jibby, Butterworth Sophie, Park Min Hae, Van der Meulen Jan, Lewis Sarah, Chong David, Russell Craig Jh
Spires Cleft Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
The Cleft Collective, Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Jun 13:10556656241261918. doi: 10.1177/10556656241261918.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between the sidedness of orofacial clefts and additional congenital malformations. DESIGN: Linkage of a national registry of cleft births to national administrative data of hospital admissions. SETTING: National Health Service, England. PARTICIPANTS: 2007 children born with cleft lip ± alveolus (CL ± A) and 2724 with cleft lip and palate (CLP) born between 2000 and 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The proportion of children with ICD-10 codes for additional congenital malformations by the sidedness (left, right or bilateral) of orofacial clefts. RESULTS: For CL ± A phenotypes, there was no evidence for a difference in the prevalence of additional anomalies between left (22%, reference), right (22%, aOR 1.02, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.28; = .90) and bilateral clefts (23%, aOR 1.09, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.57; = .66). For CLP phenotypes, there was evidence of a lower prevalence of additional malformations in left (23%, reference) compared to right (32%, aOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.91; < .001) and bilateral clefts (33%, aOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.99; < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of additional congenital malformations was similar across sidedness subtypes with CL ± A phenotypes but was different for sidedness subtypes within CLP cases. These data support the hypothesis that CL ± A has a different underlying aetiology from CLP and that within the CLP phenotype, right sided CLP may lie closer in aetiology to bilateral CLP than it does to left sided CLP.
目的:研究口面部裂隙的侧别与其他先天性畸形之间的关联。 设计:将全国性的唇腭裂出生登记册与全国医院入院管理数据相链接。 地点:英国国家医疗服务体系。 参与者:2000年至2012年间出生的2007例唇裂±牙槽突裂(CL±A)患儿以及2724例唇腭裂(CLP)患儿。 主要观察指标:根据口面部裂隙的侧别(左侧、右侧或双侧),有国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)编码记录其他先天性畸形的患儿比例。 结果:对于CL±A表型,没有证据表明左侧(22%,参照组)、右侧(22%,校正比值比1.02,95%可信区间0.80至1.28;P = 0.90)和双侧唇裂(23%,校正比值比1.09,95%可信区间0.75至1.57;P = 0.66)之间其他异常的患病率存在差异。对于CLP表型,有证据表明与右侧(32%,校正比值比1.54,95%可信区间1.25至1.91;P < 0.001)和双侧唇裂(33%,校正比值比1.64,95%可信区间1.35至1.99;P < 0.001)相比,左侧(23%,参照组)其他畸形的患病率较低。 结论:CL±A表型各侧别亚型的其他先天性畸形患病率相似,但CLP病例各侧别亚型的患病率不同。这些数据支持以下假设,即CL±A与CLP具有不同的潜在病因,并且在CLP表型中,右侧CLP在病因上可能比左侧CLP更接近双侧CLP。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024-6-13
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024-8-2
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-2-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017-9
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-4-13
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025-5
Br Dent J. 2023-6
Arch Oral Biol. 2022-9
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023-8
Genet Epidemiol. 2021-10
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018-2-9
Am J Med Genet A. 2018-2
EMBO J. 2017-10-16