口腔裂相关结构和染色体缺陷的系统评价:何时需要进行产前基因分析?
A systematic review of associated structural and chromosomal defects in oral clefts: when is prenatal genetic analysis indicated?
机构信息
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
出版信息
J Med Genet. 2012 Aug;49(8):490-8. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101013.
BACKGROUND
Oral clefts-comprising cleft lip (CL), cleft lip with cleft palate (CLP), and cleft palate (CP)-are being diagnosed prenatally more frequently. Consequently, the need for accurate information on the risk of associated anomalies and chromosomal defects to aid in prenatal counselling is rising. This systematic review was conducted to investigate the prenatal and postnatal prevalence of associated anomalies and chromosomal defects related to cleft category, thereby providing a basis for prenatal counselling and prenatal invasive diagnostics.
METHODS
Online databases were searched for prenatal and postnatal studies on associated anomalies and chromosomal defects in clefts. Data from the literature were complemented with national validated data from the Dutch Oral Cleft Registry.
RESULTS
Twenty studies were included: three providing prenatal data, 13 providing postnatal data, and four providing both. Data from prenatal and postnatal studies showed that the prevalence of associated anomalies was lowest in CL (0-20.0% and 7.6-41.4%, respectively). For CLP, higher frequencies were found both prenatally (39.1-66.0%) and postnatally (21.1-61.2%). Although CP was barely detectable by ultrasound, it was the category most frequently associated with accompanying defects in postnatal studies (22.2-78.3%). Chromosomal abnormalities were most frequently seen in association with additional anomalies. In the absence of associated anomalies, chromosomal defects were found prenatally in CLP (3.9%) and postnatally in CL (1.8%, 22q11.2 deletions only), CLP (1.0%) and CP (1.6%).
CONCLUSIONS
Prenatal counselling regarding prognosis and risk of chromosomal defects should be tailored to cleft category, and more importantly to the presence/absence of associated anomalies. Irrespective of cleft category, clinicians should advise invasive genetic testing if associated anomalies are seen prenatally. In the absence of associated anomalies, prenatal conventional karyotyping is not recommended in CL, although array comparative genomic hybridisation should be considered. In presumed isolated CLP or CP, prenatal invasive testing, preferably by array based methods, is recommended.
背景
唇腭裂(包括唇裂、唇裂合并腭裂和腭裂)的产前诊断率越来越高。因此,需要准确了解相关畸形和染色体缺陷的风险,以辅助产前咨询。本系统评价旨在研究唇腭裂类型相关畸形和染色体缺陷的产前和产后患病率,为产前咨询和产前有创诊断提供依据。
方法
检索在线数据库中有关唇腭裂相关畸形和染色体缺陷的产前和产后研究。文献数据由荷兰口腔裂畸形登记处的全国验证数据补充。
结果
共纳入 20 项研究:3 项提供产前数据,13 项提供产后数据,4 项同时提供。产前和产后研究的数据显示,CL 的相关畸形患病率最低(分别为 0-20.0%和 7.6-41.4%)。CLP 的频率较高,产前为 39.1-66.0%,产后为 21.1-61.2%。尽管 CP 超声难以检测,但在产后研究中它是最常与其他缺陷相关的类型(22.2-78.3%)。染色体异常最常与其他畸形相关。在没有相关畸形的情况下,CLP 产前发现染色体缺陷(3.9%),CL 产后发现染色体缺陷(1.8%,仅 22q11.2 缺失)、CLP 产后发现染色体缺陷(1.0%)和 CP 产后发现染色体缺陷(1.6%)。
结论
针对不同类型的唇腭裂,包括是否存在相关畸形,应根据预后和染色体缺陷的风险进行产前咨询。无论唇腭裂的类型如何,如果产前发现相关畸形,临床医生都应建议进行有创性遗传检测。如果没有相关畸形,不建议对 CL 进行产前常规核型分析,但应考虑进行微阵列比较基因组杂交分析。对于疑似孤立性 CLP 或 CP,建议进行产前有创性检测,最好采用基于微阵列的方法。