French Institute of Sport (INSEP), Laboratory Sport, Expertise and Performance (EA 7370), Paris, France; University Paris Cité, Paris, France; Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada.
French Institute of Sport (INSEP), Laboratory Sport, Expertise and Performance (EA 7370), Paris, France.
J Biomech. 2024 Jun;171:112170. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112170. Epub 2024 May 24.
Fascicle force-length relationship is one major basic mechanical property of skeletal muscle, subsequently influencing movement mechanics. While force-length properties are increasingly described through ultrafast ultrasound imaging, their test-retest reliability remains unknown. Using ultrafast ultrasound, and electrically evoked contractions at various ankle angles, gastrocnemius medialis fascicle force-length relationship was assessed twice, few days apart, in sixteen participants. The test-retest reliability of the resulting fascicle force-length relationship key parameters - i.e., maximal force (F), and optimal fascicle length (L) - was evaluated considering (i) all the trials obtained at each ankle joint and (ii) the mean of the two trials obtained at each tested angle. Considering all trials, L indicated a 'high' test-retest reliability, with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.89 and F a 'moderate' reliability (ICC = 0.71), while when averaging the two trials L reliability was 'very-high' (ICC = 0.91), and F reliability 'moderate' (ICC = 0.73). All values of coefficient of variation and standard error of measurement were low, i.e., ≤7.7 % and ≤0.35 cm for L and ≤3.4 N for F, respectively. Higher absolute reliability was reported for L than F, with better reliability when averaging the two trials at each angle. All these parameters, in accordance with the limit of agreement, demonstrated that L and F test-retest reliability is acceptable, particularly when averaging multiple points obtained at a given angle. Interestingly, the shape of the fascicle force-length relationship is more variable. Therefore, L and F can be used to compare between days-effects following an intervention, while a comparison of fascicle operating lengths may require more precautions.
肌节力-长度关系是骨骼肌的主要基本力学特性之一,随后会影响运动力学。虽然力-长度特性越来越多地通过超快超声成像来描述,但它们的测试-再测试可靠性仍然未知。本研究使用超快超声,在不同踝关节角度下通过电刺激收缩,在 16 名参与者中分别在几天内两次评估内侧比目鱼肌肌节力-长度关系。考虑到 (i) 在每个踝关节获得的所有试验和 (ii) 在每个测试角度获得的两次试验的平均值,评估了肌节力-长度关系的关键参数(即最大力 (F) 和最佳肌节长度 (L))的测试-再测试可靠性。考虑到所有试验,L 显示出“高”的测试-再测试可靠性,组内相关系数 (ICC) 为 0.89,F 为“中”可靠性 (ICC = 0.71),而当平均两次试验时,L 的可靠性为“非常高”(ICC = 0.91),F 的可靠性为“中”(ICC = 0.73)。所有变异系数和测量标准误差的值均较低,即 L 为 ≤7.7%,F 为 ≤3.4N,L 为 ≤0.35cm。L 的绝对可靠性高于 F,在每个角度平均两次试验时具有更好的可靠性。所有这些参数与一致性限一致,表明 L 和 F 的测试-再测试可靠性是可以接受的,尤其是在给定角度下平均多个点时。有趣的是,肌节力-长度关系的形状更具可变性。因此,L 和 F 可用于比较干预后几天的效果,而比较肌节工作长度可能需要更多的注意。