Coringrato Eva, Alaimo Katherine, Leiferman Jenn A, Villalobos Angel, Buchenau Hannah, Decker Erin, Fahnestock Lara, Quist Pallas, Litt Jill S
Department of Environmental Studies, University of Colorado Boulder, 4001 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA.
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, G. Malcolm Trout Building, Room 208C, Michigan State University, 469 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 13;14(1):13620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63889-w.
As part of the Community Activation for Prevention (CAPS) randomized controlled trial (RCT) of community gardening, we conducted a process evaluation to assess the implementation of a community gardening intervention over nine months, as measured by reach, fidelity (delivery, receipt, enactment), and acceptability. Evaluation instruments included repeated semi-structured interviews with study participants, direct observation of community garden sites, and an exit survey of participants. Primary outcomes were diet, physical activity, and anthropometry; secondary outcomes were stress and anxiety. The CAPS trial included 291 participants (19% non-white; 34% Hispanic/Latino; 35% without a college degree; 58% with income < $50,000 per year). Intervention delivery and receipt were high for environmental supports. Garden social events were offered by 73% of gardens, although only 48% of intervention participants reported attending these events. Of the 145 participants assigned to the gardening intervention, 97 (67%) reported gardening the entire season and reported visiting the community garden a median of 90 min per week (range: 0-840). Of the participants who completed the exit survey (48%), 89% were highly satisfied with the overall garden experience. The CAPS trial was favorably received and implemented with high fidelity, supporting the validity of the trial outcomes. These findings suggest that community gardens are a viable health promotion strategy that can be successfully implemented among new gardeners from diverse backgrounds. Strategies that engage new gardeners in the social aspects of the garden environment and connect gardeners with garden "mentors" or "buddies" to ensure new gardeners achieve success in their first years of gardening are recommended.Trial registration: NCT03089177. Registered 24 March 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03089177 .
作为社区园艺预防社区激活(CAPS)随机对照试验(RCT)的一部分,我们进行了一项过程评估,以评估为期九个月的社区园艺干预措施的实施情况,评估指标包括覆盖范围、保真度(提供、接受、实施)和可接受性。评估工具包括对研究参与者进行多次半结构化访谈、对社区花园场地进行直接观察以及对参与者进行退出调查。主要结果是饮食、身体活动和人体测量;次要结果是压力和焦虑。CAPS试验包括291名参与者(19%为非白人;34%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔;35%没有大学学位;58%年收入低于5万美元)。环境支持方面的干预措施提供和接受程度较高。73%的花园举办了花园社交活动,不过只有48%的干预参与者报告参加了这些活动。在分配到园艺干预组的145名参与者中,97名(67%)报告整个季节都在园艺,且报告每周访问社区花园的时间中位数为9分钟(范围:0 - 840分钟)。在完成退出调查的参与者中(48%),89%对整体花园体验非常满意。CAPS试验受到好评并以高保真度实施,支持了试验结果的有效性。这些发现表明,社区花园是一种可行的健康促进策略,可以在来自不同背景的新园艺者中成功实施。建议采取策略让新园艺者参与花园环境的社交方面,并将园艺者与花园“导师”或“伙伴”联系起来,以确保新园艺者在园艺的头几年取得成功。试验注册:NCT03089177。于2017年3月24日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03089177 。