Suppr超能文献

一项关于社区园艺改善健康行为、减轻压力和焦虑的随机对照试验的过程评估。

A process evaluation of a randomized-controlled trial of community gardening to improve health behaviors and reduce stress and anxiety.

作者信息

Coringrato Eva, Alaimo Katherine, Leiferman Jenn A, Villalobos Angel, Buchenau Hannah, Decker Erin, Fahnestock Lara, Quist Pallas, Litt Jill S

机构信息

Department of Environmental Studies, University of Colorado Boulder, 4001 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA.

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, G. Malcolm Trout Building, Room 208C, Michigan State University, 469 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 13;14(1):13620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63889-w.

Abstract

As part of the Community Activation for Prevention (CAPS) randomized controlled trial (RCT) of community gardening, we conducted a process evaluation to assess the implementation of a community gardening intervention over nine months, as measured by reach, fidelity (delivery, receipt, enactment), and acceptability. Evaluation instruments included repeated semi-structured interviews with study participants, direct observation of community garden sites, and an exit survey of participants. Primary outcomes were diet, physical activity, and anthropometry; secondary outcomes were stress and anxiety. The CAPS trial included 291 participants (19% non-white; 34% Hispanic/Latino; 35% without a college degree; 58% with income < $50,000 per year). Intervention delivery and receipt were high for environmental supports. Garden social events were offered by 73% of gardens, although only 48% of intervention participants reported attending these events. Of the 145 participants assigned to the gardening intervention, 97 (67%) reported gardening the entire season and reported visiting the community garden a median of 90 min per week (range: 0-840). Of the participants who completed the exit survey (48%), 89% were highly satisfied with the overall garden experience. The CAPS trial was favorably received and implemented with high fidelity, supporting the validity of the trial outcomes. These findings suggest that community gardens are a viable health promotion strategy that can be successfully implemented among new gardeners from diverse backgrounds. Strategies that engage new gardeners in the social aspects of the garden environment and connect gardeners with garden "mentors" or "buddies" to ensure new gardeners achieve success in their first years of gardening are recommended.Trial registration: NCT03089177. Registered 24 March 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03089177 .

摘要

作为社区园艺预防社区激活(CAPS)随机对照试验(RCT)的一部分,我们进行了一项过程评估,以评估为期九个月的社区园艺干预措施的实施情况,评估指标包括覆盖范围、保真度(提供、接受、实施)和可接受性。评估工具包括对研究参与者进行多次半结构化访谈、对社区花园场地进行直接观察以及对参与者进行退出调查。主要结果是饮食、身体活动和人体测量;次要结果是压力和焦虑。CAPS试验包括291名参与者(19%为非白人;34%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔;35%没有大学学位;58%年收入低于5万美元)。环境支持方面的干预措施提供和接受程度较高。73%的花园举办了花园社交活动,不过只有48%的干预参与者报告参加了这些活动。在分配到园艺干预组的145名参与者中,97名(67%)报告整个季节都在园艺,且报告每周访问社区花园的时间中位数为9分钟(范围:0 - 840分钟)。在完成退出调查的参与者中(48%),89%对整体花园体验非常满意。CAPS试验受到好评并以高保真度实施,支持了试验结果的有效性。这些发现表明,社区花园是一种可行的健康促进策略,可以在来自不同背景的新园艺者中成功实施。建议采取策略让新园艺者参与花园环境的社交方面,并将园艺者与花园“导师”或“伙伴”联系起来,以确保新园艺者在园艺的头几年取得成功。试验注册:NCT03089177。于2017年3月24日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03089177

相似文献

3
Rationale and design for the community activation for prevention study (CAPs): A randomized controlled trial of community gardening.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 May;68:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
9
Growing Healthy Hearts: Gardening Program Feasibility in a Hospital-Based Community Garden.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Oct;52(10):958-963. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.07.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of gardening activities on domains of health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 22;25(1):1102. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22263-9.

本文引用的文献

2
Community gardens and their effects on diet, health, psychosocial and community outcomes: a systematic review.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;22(1):1247. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13591-1.
4
Measuring Nature Contact: A Narrative Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 13;18(8):4092. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084092.
5
Growing Healthy Hearts: Gardening Program Feasibility in a Hospital-Based Community Garden.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Oct;52(10):958-963. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.07.006.
7
Medical Research Council framework for development and evaluation of complex interventions: A comprehensive guidance.
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Apr 28;9:88. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_649_19. eCollection 2020.
8
CAPS on the move: Crafting an approach to recruitment for a randomized controlled trial of community gardening.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Nov 8;16:100482. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100482. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
Cultivating healthy trajectories: An experimental study of community gardening and health.
J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov-Dec;25(13-14):2418-2427. doi: 10.1177/1359105318800784. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
Rationale and design for the community activation for prevention study (CAPs): A randomized controlled trial of community gardening.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 May;68:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验