• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过社区园艺提高生活方式的可持续性:来自JArDinS准实验研究的结果与经验教训。

Improving lifestyles sustainability through community gardening: results and lessons learnt from the JArDinS quasi-experimental study.

作者信息

Tharrey Marion, Sachs Ashby, Perignon Marlène, Simon Chantal, Mejean Caroline, Litt Jill, Darmon Nicole

机构信息

MOISA, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, CIHEAM-IAMM, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.

University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 26;20(1):1798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09836-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-09836-6
PMID:33243204
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7690132/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite an increasing number of studies highlighting the health benefits of community gardening, the literature is limited by cross-sectional designs. The "JArDinS" quasi-experimental study aimed to assess the impact of community garden participation on the adoption of more sustainable lifestyles among French adults.

METHODS

Individuals entering a community garden in Montpellier (France) in 2018 (n = 66) were compared with pairwise matched individuals with no experience in community gardening (n = 66). Nutritional quality, environmental impact and cost of monthly household food supplies, level of physical activity measured by accelerometers, as well as mental and social well-being, sensitivity to food waste, and connection with nature were evaluated at baseline (t0) and 12 months later (t1) to explore sustainability of lifestyles in social/health, environmental and economic dimensions. Linear mixed models were used to determine the independent effect of community gardening on investigated lifestyles components. In-depth interviews were conducted at t1 with 15 gardeners to better understand changes that may have occurred in gardeners' lives during the first year of gardening.

RESULTS

At t0, gardeners had lower education level, lower BMI and their household reported lower percentage of meals consumed outside of the home compared to non-gardeners (p <  0.05). Participating in the community garden had no significant impact, in spite of sufficient statistical power, on fruit and vegetables supplies (main outcome), nor on physical activity parameters, nor on others of the social/health, environmental and economic lifestyles components investigated. Qualitative interviews suggested the existence of pre-established health and environmental consciousness in some gardeners and revealed several barriers to the participation such as lack of time, lack of gardening knowledge, physical difficulty of gardening, health problems and conflicts with other gardeners.

CONCLUSIONS

The health benefits of community gardening previously reported by cross-sectional studies might be confounded by selection bias. The JArDinS study highlights the need to identify solutions to overcome barriers related to community garden participation when designing relevant public health interventions for the promotion of sustainable lifestyles.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03694782 . Date of registration: 3rd October 2018, retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

尽管越来越多的研究强调社区园艺对健康有益,但相关文献受限于横断面设计。“JArDinS”准实验研究旨在评估法国成年人参与社区园艺对采用更可持续生活方式的影响。

方法

将2018年进入法国蒙彼利埃一个社区花园的个人(n = 66)与两两匹配的无社区园艺经验的个人(n = 66)进行比较。在基线(t0)和12个月后(t1)评估家庭每月食物供应的营养质量、环境影响和成本、通过加速度计测量的身体活动水平,以及心理和社会幸福感、对食物浪费的敏感度和与自然的联系,以探讨社会/健康、环境和经济层面生活方式的可持续性。使用线性混合模型确定社区园艺对所调查生活方式组成部分的独立影响。在t1时对15名园艺参与者进行了深入访谈,以更好地了解园艺参与者在园艺第一年生活中可能发生的变化。

结果

在t0时,与非园艺参与者相比,园艺参与者的教育水平较低、体重指数较低,且其家庭报告在家外就餐的比例较低(p < 0.05)。尽管有足够的统计效力,但参与社区园艺对水果和蔬菜供应(主要结果)、身体活动参数以及所调查的社会/健康、环境和经济生活方式的其他组成部分均无显著影响。定性访谈表明,一些园艺参与者存在预先确立的健康和环境意识,并揭示了参与的几个障碍,如时间不足、缺乏园艺知识、园艺的身体困难、健康问题以及与其他园艺参与者的冲突。

结论

横断面研究先前报道的社区园艺对健康的益处可能受到选择偏倚的混淆。“JArDinS”研究强调,在设计促进可持续生活方式的相关公共卫生干预措施时,需要确定克服与社区园艺参与相关障碍的解决方案。

试验注册

该研究在clinicaltrials.gov上注册为NCT03694782。注册日期:2018年10月3日,追溯注册。

相似文献

1
Improving lifestyles sustainability through community gardening: results and lessons learnt from the JArDinS quasi-experimental study.通过社区园艺提高生活方式的可持续性:来自JArDinS准实验研究的结果与经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 26;20(1):1798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09836-6.
2
Does participating in community gardens promote sustainable lifestyles in urban settings? Design and protocol of the JArDinS study.参与社区花园是否能促进城市环境中的可持续生活方式?JArDinS 研究的设计与方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 17;19(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6815-0.
3
Community gardening in poor neighborhoods in France: A way to re-think food practices?法国贫困社区的社区园艺:重新思考食物实践的一种方式?
Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:589-598. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 17.
4
Evidence on the contribution of community gardens to promote physical and mental health and well-being of non-institutionalized individuals: A systematic review.社区花园对促进非机构化个体身心健康和幸福感的贡献的证据:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 6;16(8):e0255621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255621. eCollection 2021.
5
A process evaluation of a randomized-controlled trial of community gardening to improve health behaviors and reduce stress and anxiety.一项关于社区园艺改善健康行为、减轻压力和焦虑的随机对照试验的过程评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 13;14(1):13620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63889-w.
6
[Relationship between fruit and vegetable gardening and health-related factors: male community gardeners aged 50-74 years living in a suburban area of Japan].果蔬园艺与健康相关因素之间的关系:居住在日本郊区的50 - 74岁男性社区园艺者
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2017;64(11):684-694. doi: 10.11236/jph.64.11_684.
7
"You feel like you're part of something bigger": exploring motivations for community garden participation in Melbourne, Australia.“你会觉得自己是更宏大事物的一部分”:探究澳大利亚墨尔本社区花园参与动机。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):745. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7108-3.
8
Rationale and design for the community activation for prevention study (CAPs): A randomized controlled trial of community gardening.社区激活预防研究(CAPs)的原理与设计:一项社区园艺随机对照试验
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 May;68:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
9
Urban community gardeners' knowledge and perceptions of soil contaminant risks.城市社区园丁对土壤污染物风险的认知与看法。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 6;9(2):e87913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087913. eCollection 2014.
10
"We need our own food, to grow our own veggies…" Remote Aboriginal food gardens in the Top End of Australia's Northern Territory.“我们需要自己的食物,自己种植蔬菜……”澳大利亚北部地区北领地偏远的原住民食物花园。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2013 Oct;37(5):434-41. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12103. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants and relationships of climate change, climate change hazards, mental health, and well-being: a systematic review.气候变化、气候变化危害、心理健康与幸福的决定因素及关系:一项系统综述
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 19;16:1601871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1601871. eCollection 2025.
2
Does Home and Wild Food Procurement Enhance Food Security in High-Income Countries?在高收入国家,家庭和野生食物采购能增强粮食安全吗?
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2025 Aug 26;12(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s40572-025-00495-6.
3
Greenspaces and Health: Scoping Review of studies in Europe.

本文引用的文献

1
School Gardening Activities Aimed at Obesity Prevention Improve Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference Parameters in School-Aged Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.学校园艺活动旨在预防肥胖,改善学龄儿童的体重指数和腰围参数:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Child Obes. 2020 Apr;16(3):154-173. doi: 10.1089/chi.2019.0253. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
2
Effectiveness of horticultural therapy in people with dementia: A quantitative systematic review.园艺疗法对痴呆症患者的疗效:一项定量系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jul;31(13-14):1983-1997. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15204. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
3
Adult Health Status Among Native American Families Participating in the Growing Resilience Home Garden Study.
绿地与健康:欧洲研究的范围综述
Public Health Rev. 2024 May 20;45:1606863. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1606863. eCollection 2024.
4
"Eco-caring together" pro-ecological group-based community interventions and mental wellbeing: a systematic scoping review.“共同关爱生态”基于生态关怀团体的社区干预与心理健康:一项系统综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 24;15:1288791. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1288791. eCollection 2024.
5
Interactions with Nature, Good for the Mind and Body: A Narrative Review.与大自然互动,有益身心健康:叙事性综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 12;21(3):329. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030329.
6
Parental Perspectives of the Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Food-Related Behaviors: Systematic Review.父母对新冠疫情封锁对与食物相关行为影响的看法:系统综述
Foods. 2022 Sep 15;11(18):2851. doi: 10.3390/foods11182851.
7
Seeds and the city: a review of municipal home food gardening programs in Canada in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.种子与城市:加拿大应对新冠疫情的城市家庭园艺项目综述
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):273. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01301-6. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
8
Community gardens and their effects on diet, health, psychosocial and community outcomes: a systematic review.社区花园及其对饮食、健康、心理社会和社区结果的影响:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;22(1):1247. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13591-1.
9
Enough to Feed Ourselves!-Food Plants in Bulgarian Rural Home Gardens.足以自给!——保加利亚乡村家庭菜园中的食用植物
Plants (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;10(11):2520. doi: 10.3390/plants10112520.
10
Community Garden Initiatives Addressing Health and Well-Being Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Infodemiology Aspects, Outcomes, and Target Populations.社区花园计划对健康和幸福感的影响:信息流行病学方面、结果和目标人群的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 17;18(4):1943. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041943.
参与“增强韧性家庭花园研究”的美国原住民家庭的成年健康状况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Aug 22;16:E113. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190021.
4
Community gardens and wellbeing amongst vulnerable populations: a thematic review.社区花园与弱势群体的幸福感:主题述评。
Health Promot Int. 2020 Aug 1;35(4):790-803. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz067.
5
Therapeutic gardens as a design approach for optimising the healing environment of patients with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: A narrative review.治疗花园作为一种设计方法,用于优化患有老年痴呆症和其他痴呆症的患者的康复环境:叙述性综述。
Explore (NY). 2019 Sep-Oct;15(5):352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 28.
6
Does participating in community gardens promote sustainable lifestyles in urban settings? Design and protocol of the JArDinS study.参与社区花园是否能促进城市环境中的可持续生活方式?JArDinS 研究的设计与方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 17;19(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6815-0.
7
Relationship between Community or Home Gardening and Health of the Elderly: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey in Japan.社区或家庭园艺与老年人健康的关系:日本基于网络的横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 17;16(8):1389. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081389.
8
Development of the Healthy Purchase Index (HPI): a scoring system to assess the nutritional quality of household food purchases.健康购买指数(HPI)的制定:一个用于评估家庭食物购买的营养质量的评分系统。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Apr;22(5):765-775. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003154. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
9
Gardening for Health: Patterns of Gardening and Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Among the Navajo.园艺与健康:纳瓦霍人的园艺模式与果蔬摄入
J Community Health. 2018 Dec;43(6):1053-1060. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0521-1.
10
Rationale and design for the community activation for prevention study (CAPs): A randomized controlled trial of community gardening.社区激活预防研究(CAPs)的原理与设计:一项社区园艺随机对照试验
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 May;68:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 18.