• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用混合方法开发左心室辅助装置受者生活质量测量工具。

Development of a quality of life measure for left ventricular assist device recipients using a mixed methods approach.

机构信息

Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

National Institute for Health and Care Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;11(5):3167-3179. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14850. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1002/ehf2.14850
PMID:38873750
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11424331/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients report symptom improvement but find adjusting to life with the LVAD challenging. These challenges are unique, and existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) do not reflect their experiences. This study aimed to develop a culturally relevant quality of life PROM for use with LVAD recipients in future research, design evolutions and clinical practice.

METHODS

A three-stage mixed-methods approach was used to develop a PROM: stage 1 included group concept mapping (GCM); stage 2 semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 LVAD recipients and 10 clinicians, and a questionnaire was developed using a conceptual framework; and stage 3 used exploratory psychometric analysis of the PROM data using Rasch measurement theory. This paper presents stages 2 and 3.

RESULTS

The conceptual framework consisted of four key concepts, including general health, life with the LVAD, equipment and clothing and emotional impact. Statements from interviews and GCM were used to create items for the LVAD quality of life (LVAD-QoL). Cognitive interviews tested face validity and participant comprehension. Forty-nine participants were recruited from three UK transplant centres. PROM data were collected and analysed using Rasch analysis. Four items displayed misfit; dependency between item sets was the biggest issue (57/485 pairwise differences). After restructuring and dealing with item misfit, the LVAD-QoL conformed to the Rasch model, supporting the psychometric properties and quality of the LVAD-QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a mixed-methods approach ensured the development of a robust and psychometrically sound tool for research, design evolution and clinical practice with LVAD recipients.

摘要

背景

左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的接受者报告症状改善,但发现适应 LVAD 的生活具有挑战性。这些挑战是独特的,现有的患者报告结局测量(PROM)并不能反映他们的体验。本研究旨在开发一种与 LVAD 接受者相关的文化适应性生活质量 PROM,用于未来的研究、设计演变和临床实践。

方法

采用三阶段混合方法学方法开发 PROM:第 1 阶段包括组概念映射(GCM);第 2 阶段对 11 名 LVAD 接受者和 10 名临床医生进行半结构式定性访谈,并使用概念框架开发问卷;第 3 阶段使用探索性心理测量分析 PROM 数据,使用 Rasch 测量理论。本文介绍第 2 阶段和第 3 阶段。

结果

概念框架由四个关键概念组成,包括一般健康、使用 LVAD、设备和服装以及情绪影响。访谈和 GCM 的语句用于为 LVAD 生活质量(LVAD-QoL)创建项目。认知访谈测试了表面效度和参与者的理解。从三个英国移植中心招募了 49 名参与者。使用 Rasch 分析收集和分析 PROM 数据。四项显示不匹配;项目集之间的依赖性是最大的问题(57/485 对差异)。在重新构建和处理项目不匹配后,LVAD-QoL 符合 Rasch 模型,支持 LVAD-QoL 的心理测量特性和质量。

结论

使用混合方法学方法确保了为 LVAD 接受者的研究、设计演变和临床实践开发一种强大且具有心理测量学意义的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3468/11424331/b55a4921596c/EHF2-11-3167-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3468/11424331/80ed78356353/EHF2-11-3167-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3468/11424331/b55a4921596c/EHF2-11-3167-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3468/11424331/80ed78356353/EHF2-11-3167-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3468/11424331/b55a4921596c/EHF2-11-3167-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a quality of life measure for left ventricular assist device recipients using a mixed methods approach.采用混合方法开发左心室辅助装置受者生活质量测量工具。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;11(5):3167-3179. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14850. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
Living with a left ventricular assist device: Capturing recipients experiences using group concept mapping software.使用左心室辅助装置生活:使用群体概念映射软件捕捉受者的体验。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 21;17(9):e0273108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273108. eCollection 2022.
3
A conceptual definition of quality of life with a left ventricular assist device: results from a qualitative study.带有左心室辅助装置的生活质量的概念定义:定性研究的结果。
Heart Lung. 2014 Jan-Feb;43(1):32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
4
Quality of life and emotional distress early after left ventricular assist device implant: a mixed-method study.左心室辅助装置植入术后早期的生活质量和情绪困扰:一项混合方法研究。
Artif Organs. 2015 Mar;39(3):220-7. doi: 10.1111/aor.12362. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
5
Efficient measurement of multiple ventricular assist device patient-reported outcomes: Creation of a 20-item profile from the MCS A-QOL study.多心室辅助装置患者报告结局的有效测量:根据MCS A-QOL研究创建一个包含20个条目的概况。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Aug;43(8):1308-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.04.060. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
6
Changes in disease-specific versus generic health status measures after left ventricular assist device implantation: Insights from INTERMACS.左心室辅助装置植入后疾病特异性与通用健康状况测量的变化:来自 INTERMACS 的见解。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Nov;36(11):1243-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 20.
7
Quality of Life and Influential Factors in Patients Implanted With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.植入左心室辅助装置患者的生活质量及影响因素
Circ J. 2015;79(10):2186-92. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0502. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
8
Novel Acoustic Biomarker of Quality of Life in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients.新型左心室辅助装置受者生活质量声学生物标志物。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e018588. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018588. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
9
Assessment of pre-operative psychosocial function among people receiving left ventricular assist devices: A national survey of US LVAD programs.评估接受左心室辅助装置治疗人群的术前心理社会功能:一项对美国 LVAD 项目的全国性调查。
Heart Lung. 2019 Jul-Aug;48(4):302-307. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
10
Caregivers and Left Ventricular Assist Devices as a Destination, Not a Journey.护理人员与左心室辅助装置——作为终点,而非旅程。
J Card Fail. 2015 Oct;21(10):806-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of the Rasch measurement model in rehabilitation research and practice: early developments, current practice, and future challenges.拉施测量模型在康复研究与实践中的应用:早期发展、当前实践及未来挑战。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Jul 17;4:1208670. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1208670. eCollection 2023.
2
A Mixed-Methods Study to Better Measure Patient-Reported Pain and Fatigue in Soft Tissue Sarcoma.一项采用混合方法的研究,以更好地测量软组织肉瘤患者报告的疼痛和疲劳情况。
Oncol Ther. 2023 Mar;11(1):129-143. doi: 10.1007/s40487-022-00219-y. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
3
Living with a left ventricular assist device: Capturing recipients experiences using group concept mapping software.
使用左心室辅助装置生活:使用群体概念映射软件捕捉受者的体验。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 21;17(9):e0273108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273108. eCollection 2022.
4
The value of patient-reported outcomes in early-phase clinical trials.患者报告结局在早期临床试验中的价值。
Nat Med. 2022 Jan;28(1):18-20. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01648-4.
5
Patient-reported outcome measures in cardiovascular disease.心血管疾病中患者报告的结局指标
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023 Feb 28;9(2):119-127. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab051.
6
Health-related quality of life in left ventricular assist device-supported patients.左心室辅助装置支持患者的健康相关生活质量
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;8(3):2036-2044. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13282. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
7
Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With a Left Ventricular Assist Device (QOLVAD) Questionnaire: Initial Psychometrics of a New Instrument.健康相关生活质量在左心室辅助装置(QOLVAD)患者问卷:新仪器的初步心理测量学评估。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021;36(2):172-184. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000774.
8
Anticoagulant treatment and bleeding complications in patients with left ventricular assist devices.左心室辅助装置患者的抗凝治疗与出血并发症
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 Jun;18(6):363-372. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2020.1773803. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
9
Experiences of left ventricular assist device-destination therapy recipients: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.左心室辅助装置-终末期心力衰竭治疗患者的体验:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart Lung. 2020 Sep-Oct;49(5):463-474. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.02.045. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
10
Sex-Based Differences in Left Ventricular Assist Device Utilization: Insights From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2004 to 2016.基于性别的左心室辅助装置使用差异:来自 2004 年至 2016 年全国住院患者样本的见解。
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Sep;12(9):e006082. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006082. Epub 2019 Sep 13.