Suppr超能文献

验证两种评分工具预测创伤患者增强型肾脏清除率风险的能力。

Validation of Two Scoring Tools to Predict Risk of Augmented Renal Clearance in Trauma Patients.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Memphis, Tennessee.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Memphis, Tennessee.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2024 Aug;300:526-533. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.026. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is prevalent in trauma populations. Identification is underrecognized by calculated creatinine clearance or estimated glomerular filtration rate equations. Predictive scores may assist with ARC identification. The goal of this study was to evaluate validity of the ARCTIC score and ARC Predictor to predict ARC in critically ill trauma patients.

METHODS

This single center, retrospective study was performed at an academic level 1 trauma center. Critically ill adult trauma patients undergoing 24-h urine-collection were included. Patients with serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, kidney replacement therapy, suspected rhabdomyolysis, chronic kidney disease, or inaccurate urine collection were excluded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for ARCTIC Score and ARC Predictor were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were created for ARCTIC score and ARC Predictor models.

RESULTS

One-hundred and twenty-two patients with ARC and 78 patients without ARC were included. The ARCTIC score sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 89%, 54%, 75%, and 75%, respectively. The ARC Predictor demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 77%, 88%, 91%, and 71%, respectively. Regression analyses revealed both ARCTIC score ≥6 and ARC Predictor threshold >0.5 as significant risk factors for ARC in presence of traumatic brain injury, obesity, injury severity score, and negative nitrogen balance (ARCTIC ≥6: odds ratio 8.59 [95% confidence interval 3.90-18.92], P < 0.001; ARC Predictor >0.5: odds ratio 20.07 [95% confidence interval 8.53-47.19], P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings corroborate validity of two pragmatic prediction tools to identify patients at high risk of ARC. Future studies evaluating correlations between ARCTIC score, ARC Predictor, and clinical outcomes are warranted.

摘要

简介

增强的肾清除率(ARC)在创伤人群中很常见。通过计算肌酐清除率或估计肾小球滤过率方程识别时,可能会被低估。预测评分可能有助于识别 ARC。本研究的目的是评估 ARCTIC 评分和 ARC Predictor 在重症创伤患者中预测 ARC 的有效性。

方法

这是一项在学术 1 级创伤中心进行的单中心回顾性研究。纳入了接受 24 小时尿液收集的重症创伤成年患者。排除血清肌酐 >1.5mg/dL、肾脏替代治疗、疑似横纹肌溶解、慢性肾脏病或尿液收集不准确的患者。计算了 ARCTIC 评分和 ARC Predictor 的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。为 ARCTIC 评分和 ARC Predictor 模型绘制了接收者操作特征曲线。

结果

共纳入 122 例 ARC 患者和 78 例无 ARC 患者。ARCTIC 评分的灵敏度、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 89%、54%、75%和 75%。ARC Predictor 的灵敏度、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 77%、88%、91%和 71%。回归分析显示,在存在创伤性脑损伤、肥胖、损伤严重程度评分和负氮平衡的情况下,ARCTIC 评分≥6 和 ARC Predictor 阈值>0.5 均为 ARC 的显著危险因素(ARCTIC≥6:比值比 8.59 [95%置信区间 3.90-18.92],P<0.001;ARC Predictor>0.5:比值比 20.07 [95%置信区间 8.53-47.19],P<0.001)。

结论

这些发现证实了两种实用的预测工具可以识别 ARC 风险较高的患者。未来需要研究评估 ARCTIC 评分、ARC Predictor 和临床结局之间的相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验